Brigadier General James Monroe Williams

The Army of the Mughal Empire was the force by which the Mughal emperors established their empire in the 16th century and expanded it to its greatest extent at the beginning of the 18th century. Although its origins, like the Mughals themselves, were in the cavalry-based armies of central Asia, its essential form and structure was established by the empire's third emperor, Akbar. The regular forces mainly recruited and fielded by Mansabdar officers.

During the 17th century, the Mughal empire possessed largest military on earth,[5] which could reached 911,400-4,039,097 infantry and 342,696 cavalry.[2] Alternatively, according to the census by Abul Fazl, it is roughly about flat 4.4 million army with less than half million of them trained as cavalry.[6]: 89–90  [3] While modern India historians put far bigger number in 26 million personnels.[4]

Employing their superior engineering to military affairs and logistic mastery, historians has compared Mughal army brute force with a Roman Empire or United States Armed Forces.[7]: 276 [6]: 158  At their height of Mughal military domination in India region, opponents of the Mughal rarely dared to confront them in frontal pitch battles, such as when the Marathas, Ahmadnagar Sultanates,[3]: 38  or the Rajput kingdoms as they are powerless against Mughal provisioned cities or artillery defended camps.[8] and usually resorted to guerilla, Fabian strategy instead to oppose the technologically more advanced Mughal military machine,[6]: 56  Stephen Morillo also noted about western scholarship generally overlooked on how destructive is was Asian empires such as the Mughal in their conquest, not unlike the Roman empire.[9] British historian Jeremy Black asserted the Mughal military struggles until its decline during Nader Shah's invasion of India were the central theme of Asiatic military development in the 17th century, contrary to the common misconception that though the European colonial powers Military Revolution as major factor in Asia.[10] Pradeep P. Barua also noted the successful takeover of rule of India region governance by British Raj, was not stemmed from advance military organization, technology, or fighting skill in the region, but instead that because the British can become major guarantor in social and political stability after the decline of Mughal.[3]: 119 

Other expert such as Irfan Habib noted that Mughal cavalry are invincible in Indian subcontinent.[11] The superiority of their heavy cavalry discipline and shock charge were a staple of Mughal cavalry.[12][13] The Empire also maintain a fleet of warships and transport ships.[14] Mughal artillery consisted of heavy cannons, light artillery, grenadiers and rockets.[6]: 48 [15]: 133 [16] Heavy cannons were very expensive and heavy for transportation, and had to be dragged by elephants and oxen into the battlefield. Pradeep Barua also noted the Mughal technology for sapping and mining warfare also saw small improvements from the Delhi sultanates which ruled India before them.[17]

History

List of conflicts involving the Mughals:

The Mughals originated in Central Asia. Like many Central Asian armies, the mughal army of Babur was horse-oriented. The ranks and pay of the officers were based on the horses they retained. Babur's army was small and inherited the Timurid military traditions of central Asia.[18] It would be wrong to assume that Babur introduced a gunpowder warfare system, because mounted archery remained the vital part of his army.[19] Babur's empire did not last long and the mughal empire collapsed with the expulsion of Humayun, and the mughal empire founded by Akbar in 1556 proved more stable and enduring.[20]

Babur to Humayun era

Babur nevertheless laying his foundation of the empire military from First Battle of Panipat, where he employ the tactic of Tulugma, encircling Ibrahim Lodi's army and forcing it to face artillery fire directly, as well as frightening its war elephants,[21] until his final subjugation of Rajputs in the battle of Chanderi.[22][23] The reign of his successor, Humayun were characterized with the conflict against Sur Empire] under Sher Shah Suri when after securing his throne, Humayun neutralized threat from Ahmed Shah had to be met. Humayun was victorious annexing Gujarat, Malwa, Champaner and the great fort of Mandu.[24] Sher Shah, who at first remained in Agra and observed Mughal military organization, as well as their administration, once recorded about how the Mughal empire military.[25][26] While conversing with a friend, Sher Shah remarked:

If luck and fortune favor me I will very shortly expel the Mughals from Hind, for the Mughals are not superior to the Afghans in battle or single combat, but the Afghans have let the Empire of Hindo slip from their hands on account of their internal dissensions. Since I have been amongst the Mughals, and know their conduct in action, I see that they have no order or discipline and that their kings from pride of birth and station do not personally superintend the government and leave all the affair and business of the state to their nobles and ministers, in whose sayings and doings they put perfect confidence. These grandees act on corrupt motives in every case whether it be of a soldier or a cultivator, or of a rebellious zamindar.[27]

Map of the Sur Empire at its greatest extent under Sher Shah Suri (1538/1540–1545)[28]

In 1535 Humayun was made aware that the Sultan of Gujarat was planning an assault on the Mughal territories in Bayana with Portuguese aid. Humayun gathered an army and marched on Bahadur.[29]: 107  However, instead of pressing his attack, Humayun ceased the campaign and consolidated his newly conquered territory, as Sultan Bahadur escaped and took up refuge with the Portuguese.[30] Shortly after Humayun had marched on Gujarat, Sher Shah Suri saw an opportunity to wrest control of Agra from the Mughals.[29]: 107  Humayun, faced with the rising threat of the Afghans in the east led by Mahmud Lodi,[31] defeated a force of them at Dadrah in 1532, and besieged Chunar following this in September 1532, which was under the control of Sher Shah. The siege continued for over four months to no avail. As a result, Sher Shah offered his loyalty to the Mughals on the condition that he remained in control of Chunar, also sending one of his sons as hostage. Humayun accepted and lifted the siege in December 1532, returning to Agra due to the rising threat of Bahadur Shah, the ruler of the Gujarat Sultanate. Humayun did not wish to split up his forces under the command of a noble to continue the siege, as this would split his strength.[32][33][34] The hostility of Sher Shah towards Bengal Sultanate prompted its ruler to request aid from Humayun, who in turn mobilized a Mughal army in July 1537, and advanced to Chunar. Humayun reached the fort in November 1537 and laid siege to it. The siege would last over six months until the fort finally fell despite the attempts from Rumi Khan to make quick work of the city. Sher Shah then led a second invasion into Bengal, seizing Rohtasgarh in March 1538, which he used to situate Afghan families and loot he obtained during the war. Sher Shah followed his victory at Rohtasgarh by besieging Gauda, which fell to the Afghan forces in April 1538.[35][31][36] With these victories, Sher Shah held his first coronation.[37][38] However, Humayun did not wish to leave Bengal in the hands of a hostile state.[39][40] Following this, Humayun began his march to Bengal against Sher Shah, however the march of the Mughal army would be overwhelmed from poor weather conditions, with rains causing the loss of his baggage between Patna and Monghyr.[41] Humayun eventually reached Gauda and seized it without any opposition on 8 September 1538.[31] Humayun remained at Gaur for months, stuck there due to the weather as he restored order into the city, while at the same time Sher Shah drove deep into his territory, seizing Bihar and Varanasi, while also recovering control over Chunar, and laying siege to Jaunpur, with other detachments of the Afghan army extending as far as Kannauj.[40] Humayun crossed the Karmanasa River, where he could easily be attacked by the Afghans. Sher Shah, seeing the fragile state of the Mughal army, attacked the Mughal army led by Humayun at the Battle of Chausa. The Afghans descended on the Mughals and caught them off guard, and resulted in the complete rout of the Mughals. Humayun barely escaped with his life, and the Mughals suffered over 7,000 dead, with many prominent noblemen killed.[42][43][44] Following his defeat, Humayun returned to Agra, and restored order after disturbances from his brother, Hindal Mirza. Humayun mobilized a large force, and advanced with an army of 40,000, while Sher Shah amassed 15,000. Humayun met Sher Shah at Kannauj, with both armies mirroring each other across the Ganges river. Humayun crossed the river and began skirmishing with Sher Shah's army. Amidst the fighting, Humayun's army saw many nobles hiding their insignia to prevent them from being recognized by the Afghans, with many nobles also fleeing from the battle. The Mughal army was defeated, which led to Humayun fleeing to Sindh. Following this victory, Sher Shah was crowned a second time on 17 May 1540 as Sher Shah, being declared as Emperor of Northern India.[45][46][47]

After Sher Shah Suri successor Islam Shah, died in 1554, Humayun gathered a vast army with the help Safavid role in Humayun's army, which its vast majority of the army of the Shi'a faith, as one Shaikh Ahmad described to Humayun, "My king, I see the whole of your army are Rafizi...Everywhere the names of your soldiers are of this kind. I find they are all Yar Ali or Kashfi Ali or Haider Ali and I have, not found a single man bearing the names of the other Companions."[48] Humayun placed the army under the leadership of Bairam Khan,who led the army through the Punjab virtually unopposed, with The only major battle faced by Humayun's armies was against Sikandar Shah Suri in Sirhind, where Bairam Khan employed a tactic whereby he engaged his enemy in open battle but then retreated quickly in apparent fear. When the enemy followed after them, they were surprised by entrenched defensive positions and were easily annihilated.[49] At the Battle of Sirhind on 22 June 1555, the armies of Sikandar Shah Suri were decisively defeated and the Mughal Empire was reestablished.[50] After Sirhind, most towns and villages chose to welcome the invading army as it made its way to the capital. On 23 July 1555, Humayun once again sat on Babur's throne in Delhi.[51]

Akbar era

During the last stage of the conflict against Sur Empire, Akbar faced Hemu, a minister and general of one of the Sur rulers, who had proclaimed himself Hindu emperor and expelled the Mughals from the Indo-Gangetic Plains.[52] Urged by Bairam Khan, who re-marshalled the Mughal army before Hemu could consolidate his position, Akbar marched on Delhi to reclaim it.[53] His army, led by Bairam Khan, defeated Hemu and the Sur army on 5 November 1556 at the Second Battle of Panipat, 50 miles (80 km) north of Delhi.[54] Soon after the battle, Mughal forces occupied Delhi and then Agra. Akbar made a triumphant entry into Delhi, where he stayed for a month. Then, he and Bairam Khan returned to Punjab to deal with Sikandar Shah Suri, who had become active again.[55] In the next six months, the Mughals won another major battle against Sikander, who fled east to Bengal. Akbar and his forces occupied Lahore and then seized Multan in the Punjab. In 1558, Akbar took possession of Ajmer, the aperture to Rajputana, after the defeat and flight of its Muslim ruler.[55] The Mughals also besieged and defeated the Sur forces in control of Gwalior Fort, a stronghold north of the Narmada river.[55]

By 1559, the Mughals launched a drive into Rajputana and Malwa Sultanate.[56] However, Akbar's disputes with his regent, Bairam Khan, temporarily put an end to the expansion.[56] Akbar dismissed Bairam Khan following a dispute at court in the spring of 1560 and ordered him to leave on Hajj to Mecca.[57]He was defeated by the Mughal army in the Punjab and forced to submit. Akbar forgave him and gave him the option of either continuing in his court or resuming his pilgrimage; Bairam chose the latter.[58] In 1560, Akbar resumed military operations.[56] A Mughal army under the command of his foster brother, Adham Khan, and a Mughal commander, Pir Muhammad Khan, began the Mughal conquest of Malwa. The Afghan ruler, Baz Bahadur, was defeated at the Battle of Sarangpur and fled to Khandesh for refuge, leaving behind his harem, treasure, and war elephants.[56] Despite initial success, Akbar was ultimately displeased with the aftermath of the campaign; his foster brother retained all of the spoils and followed through with the Central Asian practice of slaughtering the surrendered garrison, their wives and children, and many Muslim theologians and Sayyids, who were descendants of Muhammad.[56] Later in 1564, Mughal forces began the conquest of Garha, a thinly populated, hilly area in central India that was of interest to the Mughals because of its herd of wild elephants.[59] Akbar did not personally lead the campaign because he was preoccupied with the Uzbek rebellion, leaving the expedition in the hands of Asaf Khan, the Mughal governor of Kara.[60] Durgavati committed suicide after her defeat at the Battle of Damoh, while Raja Vir Narayan was slain at the Fall of Chauragarh, the mountain fortress of the Gonds.[60] The Mughals seized immense wealth, including an uncalculated amount of gold and silver, jewels, and 1,000 elephants. Kamala Devi, a younger sister of Durgavati, was sent to the Mughal harem.[60] From the year of 1578[61] until 1597, the Mughal empire has engaged series of conflicts against local Bengal warlord named Isa Khan.[62] Isa Khan was previously an ally of Mughal enemy, the Karrani dynasty, which helped Isa Khan in his expedition to Chittagong against Udai Manikya, the Maharaja of Tripura.[61] Later on, Isa Khan submitted to emperor Akbar, who then assigned 22 Parganas or administrative units under the ruling of Isa.[63]

In 1570, a deviant Sufism movement which preaching Wahdat al-Wujud grow in Peshawar, which founded by their charismatic leader Pir Roshan.[64][65] The Roshani movement played an important part in politically in resisting the increasing influence of Mughals in Afghan region as they gained popular supports from the Afghanis.[65] Pir Roshan spent his life in conflict with the Mughals until his death in 1572.[65] His successors continued his struggle against the Mughals, and even captured Ghazni city at one point, prompting emperor Jahangir to deal with the rebellion more seriously, which after constant battles against the sect, the movement eventually weakened and ended.[65]

In 1572, the Mughal Empire annexed Gujarat and acquired its first access to the sea, but local officials informed Akbar that the Portuguese had begun to exert control in the Indian Ocean. Akbar obtained a cartaz (permit) from the Portuguese to sail in the Persian Gulf region.[66] At the initial meeting of the Mughals and the Portuguese during the Siege of Surat in 1572, the Portuguese, recognising the superior strength of the Mughal army, chose to adopt diplomacy instead of war. The Portuguese Governor, upon the request of Akbar, sent him an ambassador to establish friendly relations.[67][68] Next year at the close of 1573, Akbar sent an armed forces under Abdul Rahim Khan-I-Khana to pacify the rebellion in Gujarat. The rebels under viceroy Muzaffar soundly defeated and fled to Cambay (Khambhat), as Abdúr-Rahím Khán had been joined by Naurang Khán and other nobles with the Mughal army from Málwa, Thus prompting Muzaffar to fled to Rajpipla.[69][70] As the conquest of Gujarát was completed in 1573, Akbar returned to Agra with the last Gujarat Sultán Muzaffar Shah III as a captive.[71]

In the end of 1577, as Wazír Khán's management was not successful, the post of viceroy was conferred upon Shaháb-ud-dín Áhmed Khán, the governor of Malwa. Shaháb-ud-dín's first step was to create new military posts and strengthen the old ones.[72] Later in 1591, Akbar faced another rebellion in Gujarat, where this time he faced the alliance of Gujarat Sultanate, Nawanagar State, Cutch State, and .[73][74][75]Muli State.[73][74][75] Akbar then sent Mirza Aziz Koka to engage them in the Battle of Bhuchar Mori.[73][76][74][77][78] The Mughal forces soundly defeated the allied force, and Mirza Aziz plundered Nawanangar.[79]

In the year 1594, Jahangir was dispatched by his father, the Emperor Akbar, alongside Asaf Khan, also known as Mirza Jafar Beg and Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak, to defeat the renegade Raja Vir Singh Deo Bundela and to capture the city of Orchha, which was considered the centre of the revolt.[80] Jahangir arrived with a force of 12,000 after many ferocious encounters and finally subdued the Bundela and ordered Vir Singh Deo to surrender. After tremendous casualties and the start of negotiations between the two, Vir Singh Deo handed over 5000 Bundela infantry and 1000 cavalry, but he feared Mughal retaliation and remained a fugitive until his death.[81] The victorious Jahangir, at 26 years of age, ordered the completion of the Jahangir Mahal a famous Mughal citadel in Orchha to commemorate and honour his victory.[82]

Jahangir to Shah Jahan era

Man Singh I Imperial court guards of Shah Jahan

In 1608, Jahangir posted Islam Khan I to subdue the rebellious son of Isa Khan, Musa Khan, the Masnad-e-Ala[83] of the Baro-Bhuyan confederacy in Bengal,[61] who was able to imprison him.[84][85]

Later, in 1612 At the time of the Mughal invasion of the Greater Sylhet region, Bayazid Karrani II, a member of the Karrani dynasty of Bengal,[86] was among the most powerful leaders of the Eastern Afghani Confederates, independently ruling its eastern half with his capital in Pratapgarh.[87][88] continuing the struggle against Mughal expansion of the previous generation under Isa Khan.[89] Bayazid was among those who had been granted lands as part of the maintenance of this alliance by the latter's son, Musa Khan.[90] Bayazid formed alliance with Khwaja Usman from Usmangarh (and Taraf) and Anwar Khan of Baniachong.[91] It was in light of this close alliance that Islam Khan I, the Mughal governor of Bengal, dispatched an imperial force against Bayazid so as to prevent the latter from providing aid.[92][93] Ghiyas Khan was appointed to lead the expedition, though due to his diffidence, command was later entrusted to Shaikh Kamal. He was assisted by officers such as Mubariz Khan, Tuqmaq Khan, Mirak Bahadur Jalair and Mir Abdur Razzaq Shirazi. Mir Ali Beg was made the bakhshi (paymaster) of this Mughal command.[94] The host consisted of four thousand matchlock-men, one thousand picked cavalry of Islam Khan I, one hundred imperial war elephants and the fleet of Musa Khan and his confederates, who had surrendered to the Mughals the previous year.[95][96] Bayazid's side consisted of the forces sworn to him and his brother Yaqub, as well as several hill-tribe chieftains (likely Kukis).[97] The host consisted of four thousand matchlock-men, one thousand picked cavalry of Islam Khan I, one hundred imperial war elephants and the fleet of Musa Khan and his confederates, who had surrendered to the Mughals the previous year.[95][96] The intense conflict rages between the alliance with the Mughal force, [98][99] until Khwaja Usman slain in one of clashes.[100] The death of Khwaja Usman greatly demoralized the Afghan, prompting Bayazid to surrender.[101] Soon after, Anwar Khan also submitted,[102] thus bringing Sylhet for the first time under the control of the Mughal empire.[88]

The Mughal Army under the command of prince Aurangzeb has recaptured Orchha in October 1635.

In 1613, Jahangir issued a sanguinary order for the extirpation of the race of the Kolis who were notorious robbers and plunders living in the most inaccessible parts of the province of Gujarat. A large number of the Koli chiefs were slaughtered and the rest hunted to their mountains and deserts. 169 heads of such Koli chiefs killed in battle by Nur-ul-llah Ibrahim, commander of 'Bollodo'.[103][104] In the same year after the Portuguese seized the Mughal ship Rahimi, which had set out from Surat on its way with a large cargo of 100,000 rupees and Pilgrims, who were on their way to Mecca and Medina to attend the annual Hajj.[105] When the Portuguese officially refused to return the ship and the passengers, the outcry at the Mughal court was unusually severe, with Jahangir himself was outraged and ordered the seizure of the Portuguese town Daman. He ordered the apprehension of all Portuguese within the Mughal Empire; he further confiscated churches that belonged to the Jesuits.[105]

In 1615, after a year of a harsh war of attrition, Rana Amar Singh I surrendered conditionally to the Mughal forces and became a vassal state of the Mughal Empire as a result of Mughal expedition of Mewar.[106] In 1615, Khurram presented Kunwar Karan Singh, Amar Singh's heir to Jahangir. Khurram was sent to pay homage to his mother and stepmothers and was later awarded by Jahangir.[107] The same year, his mansab was increased from 12000/6000 to 15000/7000, to equal that his brother Parvez's and was further increased to 20000/10000 in 1616.[108][109]

During the conquest of Kangra under Jahangir, that at the presence of Mughal scholar Ahmad Sirhindi who directly observing the campaign, the Mughal forces had the Idols broken, a cow slaughtered, Khutbah sermon read, and other Islamic rituals performed.[110] Further mark of Jahangir departure from Akbar secular policy were recorded Terry, a traveller, who came and observed India region between 1616-1619, where he found the mosques full of worshippers, the exaltation of Quran and Hadith practical teaching, and the complete observance of Fasting during Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr celebrations.[110] Aurangzeb, son of Shah Jahan, has let the Mughal empire engaging various military campaign, including the pacification of the Bundela Rajputs in Siege of Orchha in year of 1635.[29][111]

Aurangzeb era

Aurangzeb leads the Mughal Army during the battle of Satara.

In 1657, emperor Aurangzeb and his army advanced towards Bijapur and besieged Bidar.[112] Thus, wealthy city of Bidar has annexed by Mughal.[113]

In 1659, Aurangzeb sent his general Raja Jai Singh to besiege the fort of Purandar and fought off all attempts to relieve it. Foreseeing defeat, Shivaji agreed to terms.[114] Jai Singh persuaded Shivaji to visit Aurangzeb at Agra, giving him a personal guarantee of safety. Their meeting at the Mughal court did not go well, however. Shivaji felt slighted at the way he was received, and insulted Aurangzeb by refusing imperial service. For this affront he was detained, but managed to effect a daring escape.[115] Shivaji returned to the Deccan, and crowned himself Chhatrapati or the ruler of the Maratha Kingdom in 1674.[116] Shivaji continues defying the Mughal until his death in 1680. and succeeded by his son, Sambhaji.[117] Then, Aurangzeb's third son Akbar left the Mughal court along with a few Muslim Mansabdar supporters and joined Muslim rebels in the Deccan. Aurangzeb in response moved his court to Aurangabad and took over command of the Deccan campaign. The rebels were defeated and Akbar fled south to seek refuge with Sambhaji, Shivaji's successor. More battles ensued, and Akbar fled to Persia and never returned.[118]

During Aurangzeb rule, the Mughal empire manage to subdue the Ahom kingdom under the leadership of Mir Jumla II in 1662, who conquered its capital, Garhgaon, and capture 100 elephants, 300000 coins, 8000 shields, 1000 ships, and 173 massive rice stores.[119]

In 1669, Hindu Jats began to organise a rebellion led by Gokula, a rebel landholder from Tilpat. By the year 1670 20,000 Jat rebels were quelled and the Mughal Army took control of Tilpat, Gokula's personal fortune amounted to 93,000 gold coins and hundreds of thousands of silver coins.[120] In the end, Gokula was caught and executed. But the Jats once again attempted rebellion. Raja Ram Jat, in order to avenge his father Gokula's death, plundered Akbar's tomb of its gold, silver and fine carpets, opened Akbar's grave and dragged his bones and burned them in retaliation.[121][122][123][124][125] Jats also shot off the tops of the minarets on the gateway to Akbar's Tomb and melted down two silver doors from the Taj Mahal.[126][127][128][129] Aurangzeb appointed Mohammad Bidar Bakht as commander to crush the Jat rebellion. On 4 July 1688, Raja Ram Jat was captured and beheaded, then his head was sent to Aurangzeb as proof.[130]

The legendary "Malik-i-Maidan" cannon is stated to be the largest piece of cast bronze ordnance in the world.[131]

In 1683, a Maratha warlord Sambhaji launched conquest of Goa, which almost eliminated the Portuguese presence in that region.[132] However, suddenly Mughal forces appeared and prevented the annihilation of Portuguese in Goa from the Maratha army.[132]

In 1685, the Mughal besieged Bijapur Fort, hwhich was well-defended by 30,000 men led by Sikandar Adil Shah and his commander Sarza Khan. at first, the bombards by Mughal cannon batteries were repulsed by the large and heavy Bijapur guns,[133] such as the famous "Malik-i-Maidan", which fired cannonballs 69 cm in diameter. Instead of capturing territories on open ground, the Mughals dug long trenches and carefully placed their artillery but made no further advancements. The Mughals could not cross through the deep 10-ft moat surrounding Bijapur Fort. Moreover, the 50-ft high 25-ft wide fine granite and lime mortar walls were almost impossible to breach. The situation for the Mughals worsened when Maratha forces led by Melgiri Pandit under Maratha Emperor Sambhaji had severed food, gunpowder and weapon supplies arriving from the Mughal garrison at Solapur.[134] The Mughals were now struggling on both fronts and became overburdened by the ongoing siege against Adil Shahi and the roving Maratha forces. Things worsened when a Bijapuri cannonball struck a Mughal gunpowder position causing a massive explosion into the trenches that killed 500 infantrymen.[135] After 18 months, In 1686, the Mughal managed to annexed Bijapur, after Siege of Bijapur, after Aurangzeb paying every soldiers with gold coins for each bucket of muds thrown into the moat, filling it with even corpses of men and animals, allowing the Mughal forces to storm the fortress.[136] to celebrate this victory, Aurangzeb spread his coins, mounting the throne of Adil Shahi sultan, and also carving the great cannon Malik-e-Maidan.[136] This event caused the commercial treaty between the Purtuguese with Sultanate of Bijapur on October 22, 1576 being annulled.[137]

in January 1687, Mughal empire besieging the Golconda Fort , which containing of the Kollur Mine, for 8 months.[138] At the end of the siege, Aurangzeb and the Mughals entered Golconda victorious, resulted in the Qutb Shahis of Golconda and the ruler Abul Hasan Qutb Shah surrendering peacefully and handing over the Nur-Ul-Ain Diamond, Great Stone Diamond, Kara Diamond, Darya-e-Nur, the Hope Diamond, the Wittelsbach Diamond and the Regent Diamond.[citation needed] The Golconda Sultanate was incorporated as a subah, or province of the Mughal Empire, called Hyderabad Subah.[139]

In 1689, Aurangzeb's forces captured and executed successor of Shivaji, Sambhaji, then His successor Rajaram, later Rajaram's widow Tarabai and their Maratha forces fought individual battles against the forces of the Mughal Empire. Territory changed hands repeatedly during the years (1689–1707) of interminable warfare. As there was no central authority among the Marathas, Aurangzeb was forced to contest every inch of territory, at great cost in lives and money. Even as Aurangzeb drove west, deep into Maratha territory – notably conquering Satara – the Marathas expanded eastwards into Mughal lands – Malwa and Hyderabad. The Marathas also expanded further South into Southern India defeating the independent local rulers there capturing Jinji in Tamil Nadu. In 1690, the Mughal general Zulfiqar Khan Nusrat Jung cooperating with Madurai Nayak dynasty undergoing the Siege of Jinji in conflict against Maratha, where after 8 years, they finally conquered the fort.[140][141]

Aurangzeb also subsequently facing the rebellion of the Sikh in 1701.[142] At first, the Sikh were incited by Guru Gobind Singh to form khalsa groups of militant movements which faced rejection by local hill chiefs.[142] Then as the Sikh Khalsas fought and defeat those hill chiefs in the Battle of Anandpur (1700), they immediately appealed to Aurangzeb for assistance from Aurangzeb, which responded by sending instructions to the Mughal officials in Punjab to take action against the Sikh.[142] Wazir Khan, the governor of Sirhind, immediately sent his forces, where they subdued the Sikh in the second battle of Anandpur in 1703-1704.[142] Another battle were fought in Chamkaur Sahib where two more sons of Guru Gobind were slain.[142] Then in 1706, another military operation undergoes in Khidrana or Muktsar in effort to further suppress the rebellion, which followed with Guru Gobind move to Talwandi Sabo or Dam Dama.[142]

Aurangzeb waged continuous war in the Deccan for more than two decades with no resolution.[143][page range too broad] He thus lost about a fifth of his army fighting rebellions led by the Marathas in Deccan India. He travelled a long distance to the Deccan to conquer the Marathas and eventually died of natural cause at the age of 88, while still fighting the Marathas.[144]

Navy history

The Ganj-i-Sawai, one of the largest trade ships in the 17th century.

About 20 years after the Siege of Hooghly, the Mughals in Bengal came into a conflict against the English East India, company under admiral Nicholson, who had been granted permission by the emperor to sail about 10 warships,[145] The objectives of the company was to seize Chittagong and consolidate its interests.[146] However, The English were defeated as the Mughal counterattack under Shaista Khan towards Hooghly proved too much.[146][147] In 1572, Akbar unsuccessfully tried to obtain compact artillery pieces from Purtuguese, hence became the reason why the Mughal could not establish their naval forces along Gujarat coast.[68]

Empress Mariam-uz-Zamani maintained large fleets of trade ships including the Rahīmī and Ganj-i-Sawai.[148][149] The Rahimi was the largest of the Indian ships trading in the Red Sea.[150] It had a sail vast areas that it was identifiable to sailors from miles away and was known to Europeans as, the great pilgrimage ship. [151] After being sacked by pirates, this ship was replaced by the Ganj-i-Sawa. This ship was eventully scaked by English Pirate Henry Every.[152]

One of the best-documented naval campaign of the Mughal empire were provided during the conflict against kingdom of Arakan, where in December 1665, Aurangzeb dispatched Shaista Khan, his governor of Bengal to command 288 vessels and more than 20,000 men to pacify the pirate activities within Arakan territory and to capture Chittagong,[153][154] while also assisted by about 40 Portuguese vessels.[155]: 230  Ibn Hussain, Shaista Khan's admiral, was asked to lead the navy, while the subahdar himself took up the responsibility of supplying provisions for the campaign. He also ordered Farhad Khan and Mir Murtaza to take the land route, while the overall command was given to Buzurg Ummed Khan, a son of Shaista Khan.[155]: 230  The Mughals and the Portuguese held sway in the following naval battle. The conquered territory to the western bank of Kashyapnadi (Kaladan river) was placed under direct imperial administration. The name of Chittagong was changed to Islamabad and it became the headquarters of a Mughal faujdar.[155]: 230  This ensuing conflict in Chittagong were documented as largest Early Modern galley battles fought which nvolved more than 500 ships. and the number of were more than 40,000 bodies.[153] After the Mughals took Chittagong, the Portuguese moved to the Ferengi Bazaar in Dhaka. Descendants of the Portuguese still reside in these places.[156]

Murud-Janjira, a semi independent island forts which allied to the Mughals.[157]

It is said in the Ahkam 'Alamgiri record that the commander of British navy, Sir John Child, has concluded peace with the Mughal empire in 1689 due to his fear towards the "Mughal navy" force of Janjira which let by Siddi Yaqub.[158] According to Grant Duff, until 1670 the imperial navy under the leadership of Khan Jahan with the Janjira mariners has clashed frequently against Maratha Navy under Shivaji, where the Janjira and Mughal naval forces always comes victorious.[159] English letters In 1672 has recorded that Aurangzeb has sent 30 small frigates to assist the Siddis in Danda-Rajapuri.[160]: 196  The resulting battle has caused Shivaji naval forces to be burned and lost 50 ships.[160]: 196  Meanwhile, Khafi Khan has recorded that previously, once the fleet of Mughal during the era of Shah Jahan once inflicted heavy losses to the Maratha naval forces and causing 200 being captured while 100 casualties, an event which fuelled the rivalry of the Siddis with the Maratha in the sea.[160]: 196 

During the era Aurangzeb, the chronicle of Ahkam 'Alamgiri, reveals how the Mughal empire has struggled to establish strong navy, boldened by the failure to prevent losses of Muslim vessels off the coast of the Maldives islands. Aurangzeb were said to possess four huge vessels at Surat and port of southern Gujarat.[161] Aurangzeb's Vizier, Jafar Khan, blames the Mughal lack of ability to establish an effective navy not due to lack of resources and money, but to the lack of men to direct (the vessels).[158] Thus Syed Hassan Askari concluded that the lack of priority of Aurangzeb to afford his naval project due to his conflicts against the Marathas has hindered him to do so.[158] Andrew de la Garza stated other reason of the Mughal navy did not evolve into a high seas fleet during the 17th century was technological inferiority of Indian blast furnaces in comparation with the European counterparts, who capable of generating the temperatures required to manufacture cast iron cannon in quantity.[153] Nevertheless, Syed maintained that Mughal was largely not independent to control the rampart piracy and European naval incursions, and instead resorted to depend on the strength of friendly Arab forces from Muscat to keep the Portuguese in check.[158]

However, Syed Hassan also highlighted that Aurangzeb are not completely neglect it since he has acquired the British expertise to strengthen the fort of Janjira island, and thus establishing naval cooperation with semi independent Siddi community naval force of Janjira State which resisted the Marathas.[158] The proficiency of the Siddi Yaqub navy are exemplified during Siege of Bombay, where Siddi Yaqub and his Mappila fleet blockaded the fortress and forced the submission of the Britain forces.[162] In the late 1600s, Sidi Yaqut received a subsidy of 400,000 rupees from emperor Aurangzeb to manage Murud-Janjira He also owned large ships which weighed 300–400 tons. According to records, these ships were unsuitable for fighting on the open sea against European warships, but their size allowed for transporting soldiers for amphibious operations.[157] Reports from travellers has noted that Mughal general Mir Jumla II were employing the services the sailors from British, the Dutch, and the Portuguese, along their ships.[163] In August, 1660, he employed 6 or 7 British sailors of a small vessel carrying Trevisa, the English Agent, to Dhaka.[163] He also utilised the services of both the Dutch and the British for constructing his warships as it is recorded a galiot built by the Dutch at Hooghly district and manned by 6 or 7 British fugitives under a captain named John Durson.[163] Furthermore, Mir Jumla also employing a British named Thomas Pratt to construct boats and making ammunition for riverine warfare[163] During the tenure of Mughal general Mir Jumla in Bengal, he employs Portuguese, English, and Dutch sailors to operate his 323 warships.[164][163] In August, 1660, he employed 6 or 7 British sailors of a small vessel carrying Trevisa, the English Agent, to Dhaka.[163] He also utilised the services of both the Dutch and the British for constructing his warships as it is recorded a galiot built by the Dutch at Hooghly district and manned by 6 or 7 British fugitives under a captain named John Durson.[163] Furthermore, Mir Jumla also employing a British named Thomas Pratt to construct boats and making ammunition for riverine warfare[163] After the death of Mir Jumla, Shaista Khan launched conquest of Chittagong in 1666, where he reviving the use of local Nawwara fleet to overcome the turbulent water water frontier of the region.[165]

Organization

The massive army of Mughals were operated in highly disciplined fashion, while also maintain a characteristic of multiethnicities among its personnels.[166] They has absorbed the whole northern and central south Asia except for some geographically isolated, or strategically insignificant settlements.[167]

Mughal emperors themselves maintained a small standing army, Instead the officers called mansabdars provided the bulk of the Mughal armed forces. Under Akbar, there are as many as 1,600 Mansabdars employed.[168] While during the reign of Shah Jahan, Mansabdars were growing into 8,000 officers.[168]

A Mansabdar officer worked for the government who was responsible for recruiting and maintaining his quota of horsemen, where practically most of Mughal armies were under Mansabdar officers.[168] The rank of Mansabdars were based on the horsemen he provided, which ranged from 10(the lowest), up to 5000. A prince had the rank of 25000. This was called the zat and sowar system. An officer had to keep men and horses in a ratio of 1:2. The horses had to be carefully verified and branded, and Arabian horses were preferred. The officer also had to maintain his quota of horses, elephants and cots for transportation, as well as foot soldiers and artillery. Soldiers were given the option to be paid either in monthly/annual payments or jagir, but many chose jagir. The emperor also allocated jagir to mansabdars for maintenance of the mansabs.[citation needed] For the Mansabdars who earned highest rank, they usually appointed as Subahdar, where a Subahdar Subahdar was the head of the Mughal provincial administration which assisted by the provincial Diwan, Bakhshi, Faujdar, Kotwal, Qazi, Sadr, Waqa-i-Navis, Qanungo and Patwari.[169] the Faujdar is the one who helping the Subahdar to Maintaining law and order and Enforcing imperial regulations, while also held commands of number of Thanas or military outposts.[170] These Thanas usually garrisoned with a fix number of Sowar soldiers.[170]

Guards of Akbar Shah II during the Durbar procession accompanied by the British Governor Charles Metcalfe

Furthermore, the administrative positions of the Mughal central government were mirrored at the provincial level.[171] with Bakhshi officers charged with the management and payment of the province's military. The provincial bakhshi often simultaneously served the function of the province's waqia-navis (news writer), and reported on all provincial mansabdars, including its senior officials (such as the subahdar or diwan).The role of provincial bakhshi could face tension from the subahdar or diwan, since the bakhshi's activities kept these officials accountable to the imperial centre.[150][172]

Meanwhile, personal royal army which under the direct command of the emperor were numbered around 24,000 soldiers.[168] These emperor personal standing armies were called Ahadis,[168] a body of cavalry trooper.[173] They were directly recruited by the Mughal emperor himself, mainly from the emperor's own blood relatives and tribesmen. They had their own pay roll and pay master, and were better paid than normal horsemen sowars. They were gentlemen soldiers, some of them normally in administrative duties in the palace.[citation needed] Another term for the Mughal emperor personal bodyguards which associated with the Ahadis was the Walashahis(lit. belonging to the king[173]), or imperial bodyguards, which regarded as the most trusted and faithful part of the troops, being directly in the pay of the Emperor.[174] They also serve as cavalrymen, similar to Ahadis.[173] They were chiefly, if not entirely, men who had been attached to the Emperor from his youth and had served him while he was only a prince and were thus marked out in a special manner as his personal attendants and household troops.[175]

The Mughal army generally divided into four branches: the cavalry (Aswaran), the infantry (Paidgan), the artillery (Topkhana) and the navy. These were not divisions with their own commanders, instead they were branches or classes that were distributed individually amongst the Mansabdars, each of whom had some of each of these divisions. The exception to this rule was the artillery, which was a specialized corps with its own designated commander, and was not part of the mansabdari troops.[4] The Mughals also carried on the tradition of harsh execution of mutineers by strapping them into the mouth of cannon and blowing them apart by the cannon shot.[176][177] This brutal tradition was copied by the British empire military to punish their own mutineers.[178][179][180]

Mobile Imperial camp & fortresses

Great Mogul And His Court Returning From The Great Mosque At Delhi by Edwin Lord Weeks.jpg

The Mughal imperial camp, known as "The exalted camp" or "The victorious camp", were used for military expeditions and royal tours, also served as a mobile, "de facto" administrative capital and also imperial army headquarters, where it is manned hundreds of thousands of people and the 50,000 horses and oxen required to transport tents, baggage and equipment as its challenge.[1] Vincent Smith further writes that the Mughal Camp was like a moving city from one place to other while Jean-Baptiste Tavernier discussing about the mode of travelling in India observed that manner of travelling in India those days is very convenient like Italy or France.[181]

This mobile military capital were constructed by more than 2,000 personnel and labourers sent on ahead of the main imperial party.[1] From the time of Akbar, Mughal military camps were huge in scale, accompanied by numerous personages associated with the royal court, as well as soldiers and labourers. All administration and governance was carried out within, while the Mughal Emperors spent a significant portion of their ruling period within these camps.[182] Akbar's entourage included small camps for journeys or hunting and large camps for royal tours and military campaigns, where it could accommodate 300000 people.[183] It is estimated the large camp were travelling in 16 km perday.[184] however, another estimation has the camp rarely traveled more than 6 km per day and was preceded by agents, scouts and workers who prepared roads and bridges, campsites, arranged the purchase of foodstuffs and fuel and assured the cooperation of local rulers.[1]

As army mansabdars, royal household, domestic servants and others presented a picture of a well-planned city, moving from one place to another place, traveller Niccolao Manucci who witnessed the grandeur has written that the grandeur of Mughal rulers entourage far greater than any European rulers.[181] Abul Fazl, who writes that it would be very difficult to describe a large encampment, while he described, “Each encampment required for its carriage 100 elephants, 500 camels, 400 carts and 100 bearers. It is escorted by 500 troopers, mansabdars, Ahadis besides, there are employed a thousand Farrashes, native of Iran, Turan and Hindustan, 500 pioneers, 100 water-carriers, 50 carpenters, tent makers and torch bearers, 50 workers in leather and 150 sweepers.”.[181] While Antoni de Montserrat, who accompanied Emperor Akbar on a Kabul expedition, gives a detailed account of the magnitude of the Imperial Camp.[181] The journey was travelled in intervals. Mughals followed different traditions from Persia with gardens and large and beautiful tents.[184] The Persian texts such as Epic of Gilgamesh, the Enuma Elish, the Code of Hammurabi, Zoroastrian texts such Vendidad and Yasna, and the Book of Genesis do not directly discuss the pavilion structure in gardens, which reflect the cultural aspect of gardens in the region.[184] The pavilions like structures in different Persian type and names used in this mobile encampment, such as emarat, khaneh, qasr, moshkuy, sarai, shabistan tagh, iwan, and kakh, while on the other side, it also contain some permanent structures, and also tents with different sizes and complexities such as khaimeh, khargah, and sardagh.[184]

The massive mobile military encampment administration of emperor Akbar, which followed by his successors, were coincided with the centralization policies which were practiced by the nomadic military style of his predecessor of Central Asian conquerors, such as the Mongols of Genghis Khan, Timur empire, and Babur[183] With the nomadic steppe culture in mind, it is recorded this model of military administration by focusing on highly mobile imperial tourage of their soldiers and followers camps as a way to gain the prestige and loyalty.[183] Babur himself wrote frequently about pitching his camp throughout Hindustan as he advanced.[183] The rationale of military strategy and political necessity—surrounded by raiding nomadic empires was such of mobile technology that allowed Babur to remain elusive to his opponents.[183] Regardless of his defeats in battle, Babur maintained control by monopolizing control of his subjects’ movements, deciding which paths they would take as they maneuvered around Hindustan in their struggle for power.[183]

Aside from such military administration semi-permanent building, the Mughal empire also erected permanent military fortresses such as Lalbagh Fort,[185] Allahabad Fort,[186] Red Fort,[187] Balapur Fort, and Purana Qila.[188] Furthermore, the Mughal empire also inherited chain of forts, or qilas, which scattered throughout the Deccan.[189]

Manpowers & weapons

Weapons used by the Mughal Infantry

Around 17th century AD, the dynasty was ruling the wealthiest empire in the world, with also the largest military on earth.[5] Mughals had approximately 24 percent share of world's economy and a military of million paid soldiers.[4][190][191] J. C. Sharman, Political scientist, has viewed the Mughal empire as centralized power of Indian region as one of Asian great power like Ming in context of population, riches, and military power that were unheard of in comparison with the contemporary European powers at their time.[192] Stephen Rosen calculated show that even the most conservative figures for Indian soldiers percapita are at least as high as those for Europe at the end of the Thirty Years’ War in 1650, which is 550,000, or 0.5 percent of a population of some 105 million (Europewest of the Urals, including Scandinavia, Britain, European Russia, Spain, and the Balkans).[3]

The theoretical potential manpower of Mughal empire in 1647 according to Kaushik Roy from Jadavpur University, could reached 911,400 cavalry and infantry. However, Kaushik Roy also quoted the accumulation the imperial revenue of 12,071,876,840 dams has been calculated by Streissand who translated that the Mughal empire military could support about 342,696 cavalry and 4,039,097 infantry in total.[2] It further illustrated that during Shah Jahan reign, in 1647 the Mughal army composed of about 911,400 infantry and cavalry, while for span of 1627-58, there are 47,000 mounted musketeers, foot musketeers, gunners, and archers.[193] Antoni de Montserrat has recorded in his work Mongolicae Legationis Commentarius, For the Mughal–Afghan Wars alone, emperor Akbar could muster 50000 cavalry, 500 war elephants and camels, along with "countless number of infantry".[166] de Montserrat also provided information that the Mughal army under Akbar consisted of multiethnicities, such as Persians, Turkmen, Chagatais, Uzbeks, Pashtuns, Gujaratis, Pathans, Rajputs, and Balochis.[166]

Battle between Mughal princes Chatelain

The Ain-i-Akbari gives the empire's high estimation number of soldiers in the 1590s as 4 million, which includes local militia, consisting mainly of foot soldiers outside of Mughal control. This represents 3 percent of an estimated Indian population of 135 million in 1600.[3] This Mughals numbers do not mention the forces fighting for the Marathas, the Deccan sultanates, and the Rajput clans opposed to the Mughals.[3] Stephen Peter Rosen further adding that the 4,4 millions of Mughal military population were somewhat lowest estimation, since he found that the Ain-i-Akbari census were too conservative as it does not cover the military pool of the southern area of India. so Peter Rosen suggested the realistic number of the overall Mughal military power were above 4,4 millions, which he suggested the number of about 4 percents of Indian population of that time.[7] Meanwhile, far higher estimation came from Abraham Eraly, who quoted Tapan Raychaudhuri work that the raw number of potential bodies of Mughal military service, along its quasi-military forces, has reached as astronomical as 26 millions potential personnel.[4] Eraly has further added the reflection of massive numbers of this Mughal military expenses in the case of Aurangzeb, who has brought about 170000 cavalry troopers and similar number of infantry and non-combatant personnels, for a campaign in Deccan alone.[4] Eraly also quoted Aurangzeb predecessor, Shah Jahan, who has boasted about 900000 army command.[4]

Other estimation came from historian Abdul-Hamid Lahori recorded the Mughal military strength in 1647 are 200,000 stipendiary cavalry, 185,000 other cavalry, and 40,000 garrisoned musketeers and gunners..[194] Andrew de la Garza added that these great number of infantry troopers were not simply an unorganized mobs, but rather group of units which designated with different roles and equipments and according to their respective tasks, from heavy shock infantries which acted like Roman legionnaires or Swiss pikemen, to the Shamsherbaz units which served as halberdier, mace fighters, or sword gladiator.[6]

When the Portuguese reached India in 1498, they brought with them firearms, among them the matchlock musket. However, expert armorers were already plentiful in India, and native craftsmen began to copy the weapons and adapting them for their own needs.[195] These indigenous matchlocks were called Toradar.[196] They were found mostly in the Mughal-influenced Northern and Central India.[196] Two types of Toradar exist: one has a very slim, from 3 feet (91 cm) to 6 feet (180 cm) long, straight stock with pentagonal-shaped section, and a light barrel; the other type is always between 5 feet (150 cm) to 6 feet (180 cm) long, has a curved stock with diamond-shaped section and a very heavy barrel, much enlarged at the breech.[196]

Under the Mughals, the most important centers of production of military equipment were Delhi and Lahore.[197] The Rajput Shamserbaz infantry enlisted in Mughal service were armed with halberd, mace, while some of othem also equipped with Sword-and-buckler set and also two-handed sword similar with western Zweihänder, where they act like central european Doppelsöldner on the offensive.[6]: 89–90 

Cavalry

Cavalry in the Durbar Procession of Mughal Emperor Akbar II (reigned 1806–1837)

The cavalry was the most superior branch of the Mughal army. By the time of emperor Jahangir, it is recorded that the Mughal empire has maintained in total 342,696 cavalry.[2] Adapted to fighting pitched battles in the northern Indian plains,[198] the Mughals were frontal-combat oriented, and shock-charge tactics of the heavy cavalry armed with swords and lances was popular in Mughal armies.[199][200] Cavalry warfare came to replace the logistically difficult elephant warfare and chaotic mass infantry tactics. Rajputs were co-opted by converting them into cavalry despite their traditions of fighting on foot. This was similar to the Marathas' service to the Deccan Sultanates.[201]

The horsemen normally recruited by mansabdars were high-class people and were better paid than foot soldiers and artillerymen, and had to possess at least two of their own horses and good equipment. The regular horseman was called a Sowar. Normally they used swords, lances, shields, more rarely guns. Their armour was made up of steel or leather, and they wore the traditional dress of their tribes. Mughal armour was not as heavy as Europe, due to the heat, but was heavier than the south Indian outfits.[202] Their armour consisted of two layers; the first consisting of steel plates and helmets to secure the head, breast, and limbs. Underneath this steel network of armour was worn an upper garment of cotton or linen quilted thick enough to resist a sword or a bullet, which came down as far as the knees. Silken pants as the lower garment and a pair of kashmir shawls wrapped around the waist completed this costume. There was a habit of covering the body in protective garments until little beyond a man's eyes could be seen.[203]

In times of crisis at battle, the Muslim Mughals would perform a type of fighting called Utara,[204] the act of dismounting from their horses and fighting on foot until they were killed rather than ride away and escape with their lives.[205]

The key to Mughal power in India was its use of warhorses and also its control of the supply of superior warhorses from Central Asia. This was confirmed by victories in the Battle of Panipat, the Battle of Machhiwara, Battle of Dharmatpur, and in eyewitness accounts such as Father Monserrate, which primarily featured the use of traditional Turko-Mongol horse archer tactics rather than gunpowder.[201] Well-bred horses were either imported from Arabia, Iran or Central Asia, or bred in Sindh, Rajasthan and parts of Punjab. Emperors at times also issued firman or imperial mandates on regular intervals addressing officials like mansabdars, kotwals, zamindars and mutasaddis for the remission of taxes for promoting the horse trade.[206][174] In the battle against Hemu, the Mughal army led by Ali Quli Khan Shaibani with three sections of cavalry vanguard with the centre were composed of 10,000 cavalry.[207] This formation included Bairam Khan's detachment of Turks.[207] Later, by the reign of Aurangzeb, the Mughal army was mainly composed of Indian Muslims.[208]

There are unique characteristics of cavalry host among each individual Subahdar governors, as the example were recorded that the father of Shuja-ud-Daula, Safdar Jang, the governor of Awadh, had maintained a contingent of 20,000 "Mughal" cavalry, who were mainly Hindustanis, many who were chiefly from the Jadibal district in Kashmir, who had imitated the Qizilbash in dress and spoke the Persian language.[209][210] Meanwhile, The Barha tribe of Indian Muslims traditionally composed the vanguard of the imperial army, which they held the hereditary right to lead in every battle.[211][212]

Camels and Elephants

Model Depicting Mughal era Elephant Armour from the late 16th to early 17th century

Mughal cavalry also included war elephants, normally used by generals. They bore well ornamented and good armour. Mainly they were used for transportation to carry heavy goods. Elephant riders in Indus river civilizations usually called Mahout.[213] They were men from desert areas like Rajasthan. A special elephant unit called Gajnal were carrying Indian swivel-gun mounted on its back.[214][215] two of these kind of light artillery could be carried by single elephant.[214] During the rule of Aurangzeb, In 1703, the Mughal commander at Coromandel, Daud Khan Panni were recorded has spent 10,500 coins to purchase 30 to 50 war elephants from Ceylon.[216] Akbar and Jahangir heavily used elephants in warfare, as Akbar himself maintained around 5000 to 7000 elephants in his fil-khana (elephant house), of which about 100 of the very best were reserved for his personal collection (khassa).[217] Meanwhile, the Delhi sultans never had more than 3,000 elephants at any time, the Mughals were much more interested in maintaining war elephants than their predecessors.[217] they fully supported changing their war tactics to also include elephants as Akbar is known as the biggest proponent of elephant warfare in the Mughal Dynasty.[217] As the writer of Akbar's personal biography titled Akbarnama, Abu al-Fazl, hasmaintained that “experienced men of Hindustan considered the value of a good elephant as equal to that of 500 horses.[217]

Aside from its military purpose, Vikram Aggarwal recorded historical accounts and religious lore together to illustrate elephants significance to Mughal leadership's right to rule, co-opting cultural symbols and repurpose it and thus underscoring the dynamic nature of culture and power in India, As it shown how elephants played major role in the culture of South Asia, as they were seen a symbol of power and reverence since the ancient Vedic period.[217] like the Aryans before them, the Mughals, fully adopted elephant husbandry into the Mughal dynasty.[217]

Some of the Rajput mansabdar's also provided camel cavalry. The Zamburaks or camel units with mounted swivel guns were though as Mughal innovation, as were first mentioned by Bernier, who reports that Aurangzeb took two to three hundred camel- guns with him on his expedition to Kashmir.[218] Its mobility compared to their Gajnal Elephant counterpart were considered pivotal, as those weapons which size are double of normal musket could be shot on top of the camels.[218] Each of two Zamburaks usually attached to the saddle of a camel and the ordnance measured in two haths and forty - six liva.[219]

Infantry

A Mughal Infantryman

The infantry was recruited either by Mansabdars, or by the emperor himself. The emperor's own infantry was called Ahsam. They were normally ill-paid and ill-equipped, and also lacked discipline.[220] This group included bandukchi or gun bearers, swordsmen, as well as servants and artisans.[220] They used a wide variety of weapons like swords, shields, lances, clubs, pistols, rifles, muskets, etc. They normally wore no armour.[220] Unlike the Europeans who placed Wagon forts in their rear formations, the Mughals army placing their wagon in front of enemy centers with.[220] Chains connected the wagons to each other to impeded enemy cavalry charges. This wagon forts provided cover for the slow-loading of the Indian rifles.[220] while also protected Heavy cavalry who positioned behind the direct-fire infantry protected.[220]

Banduqchis

The Banduqchis were the musketmen in the infantry. They formed the bulk of the Mughal infantry.[221] Locally recruited and equipped with matchlocks, bows and spears, the infantry was held in low status and was virtually equated with palanquin bearers, woodworkers, cotton carders in the army payrolls. Their matchlocks were thrice as slow as the mounted archers. Chronicles hardly mention them in battle accounts.[222] Indian Muslims usually enlisted in the cavalry and seldom recruited in the infantry, looking down at fighting with muskets with contempt. The Banduqchis were mainly made up of Hindus of various castes who were known for their skills as gunmen, such as the Bundelas, the Karnatakas and the men of Buxar.[223][224][225][226][227]

Shamsherbaz

The main infantry was supplemented by specialized units such as the Shamsherbaz. Meaning "sword-wielders" or "gladiators", the Shamsherbaz were elite heavy infantry companies of highly skilled swordsmen. As their name implies, a few of them were assigned to the court to serve as palace guards, or participate in mock-battles of exhibitions of skill. However, tens of thousands of them were assigned to army units by the Mansabdars around the Mughal Empire.[228] The Shamsherbaz were frequently used in siege warfare, where they would be unleashed to deal with the resistance once the walls were breached with explosives or artillery.[229] Much of the Shamsherbaz were recruited from religious sects such as Sufi orders.[230]: 89–90 

Many of Rajputs entered service of the Mughal army either as regular soldier or mercenary, as Shamserbaz.[6]

Artillery

The artillery was a specialized corps with its own designated commander, the Mir-i-Atish.[231] The office of Mir-i-Atish grew in importance during the time of the later Mughals.[232] Being in charge of the defense of the Imperial Palace Fort and being in personal contact with the Emperor, the Mir-i-Atish commander great influence.[233] They were somewhat risky to be used in the battlefield, since they exploded sometimes, killing the crew members. Light artillery was the most useful in the battle field. They were mainly made up of bronze and drawn by horses. This also included swivel guns born by camels called zamburak. Since Mughal rule, Indian Muslims maintained the dominance of artillery in India, and even after the fall of the Mughal empire, various non-Muslim Indian kingdoms continued to recruit Hindustani Muslims as artillery officers in their armies.[234]

The Mughals artillery corps also employed hand grenade,[235] and rocket artilleries.[6]: 48 [15]: 133  These rockets are considered as predecessor of Mysorean rockets which employed by Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan[16]

Navy

1565-Battle Scene with Boats on the Ganges-Akbarnama

The Navy's main duty was controlling piracy, sometimes used in war.[236] It is known from the standard survey of maritime technology in 1958, that the Bengalis expertize on shipbuilding were duplicated by The British East India Company in the 1760s, which leading to significant improvements in seaworthiness and navigation for European ships during the Industrial Revolution.[237]

The foundation of salt water naval force of the Mughal empire were established by Akbar from the late 16th century after he conquered Bengal and Gujarat.[153] In early 1600, the Mughals employed Bengali local warriors as their naval force, which operating fleets of Nawwara.[174]: 165 [164] these Nawwara is a Bengal indigenous made warship.[238] These locals were consisted of the twelve chiefs of Baro-Bhuyan military confederacy, where they responsible for the shipbuildings, commercial trades, slave raidings, and military protections.[174]: 165  The Mughals assign these local warlords in naval position and also uncultivated lands for them.[174]: 165 [164] Emperor Akbar reorganized the imperial navy from a collections of civilian vessels with more professional institutions of Naval administration which is detailed in the Ain-i-Akbari, the annals of Akbar's reign.It identifies the navy's primary objectives including the maintenance of transport and combat vessels, the retention of skilled seamen, protection of civilian commerce and the enforcement of tolls and tariffs.[153] Akbar were recorded in A'in Mir Bahri, to be possessed 3000 armed vessels, although later decreased into 768.[161] Among them, there are 923 Portuguese sailors in service of Akbar.[161]

During his tenure, Mughal general Mir Jumla repaired and fortified three river forts, Hajiganj Fort, Sonakanda Fort, and Idrakpur Fort.[164] Mir Jumla also constructing land-based defensensive installations put on those floating water forts, which constructed by lashing ships, and large rafts to enable the Mughal soldiers to fight on water.[164] Heavy artillery pieces brought on board rafts to supplement the existing ones, while wagons lashed to decks and stacks of crates and bales of straw or cotton formed makeshift fortification.[164]

According to records in the Mughal invasion on kingdom of Ahom, the characteristic of Ghurab warships of Mughals in Bengal regions were Ghurab warships which were outfitted with 14 guns.[239] the personnels were numbered around 50 to 60 crews.[239] The officers of those ships were conscripted from Dutch, Portuguese, British, and Russian naval officers.[239]

Another Mughal warships characteristics were their strength and their size, due to the shipbuilding skills of their Bengalis shipbuilder.[14] Contrary to the naval forces in Bengal which relied mostly on riverine fitted Gharb warships,[240]: 28  the naval forces of Janjira state which given subsidy and sponsored by Aurangzeb with the access of Surat port could construct more bigger ships like frigates and Man-of-war[240]: 34  The Man-of-war ships of Mughals were as big as English Third-rate.[241]: 499–500  while the frigates used prow instead of Beakhead.[241]: 499–500  some of these ships carried thirty to forty pieces of cannons.[241]: 499–500  This Siddi navy has armed with rare huge vessels of certain craft which weighted between 300 and 400 tonnage with heavy ordnance on row boats, where few matchlock gunner and spear men cramped.[158] The use of hand-driven pumps to dispose excessive water from boats was already used by Indian shipmasters in the seventeenth century.[13]: 287 

Chelas

Chela were slave soldiers in the Mughal army. As a counterpoise to the mercenaries in their employ, over whom they had a very loose hold, commanders were in the habit of getting together, as the kernel of their force, a body of personal dependents or slaves, who had no one to look to except their master. Such troops were known by the Hindi name of chela (a slave). They were fed, clothed, and lodged by their employer, had mostly been brought up and trained by him, and had no other home than his camp. They were recruited chiefly from children taken in war or bought from their parents during times of famine. The great majority were of Hindu origin, but all were made Muslims when received into the body of chelas. These chelas were the only troops on which a man could place entire reliance as being ready to follow his fortunes in both foul and fair weather.[242]

Like the Timurids and other Mongol-derived armies, and unlike other Islamic states, the Mughal empire did not use slave soldiers prominently. Slave soldiers were mainly placed in very lowly positions such as manual labourers, footmen and low-level officers rather than professional elite soldiers like Ghilman, Mamluks or Janissaries. However, eunuch officers were prized for their loyalty.[243]

Female palace guards

During the Mughal Dynasty, urdubegis were the class of women assigned to protect the emperor and inhabitants of the zenana, or Harem of the emperor.[244] Because the women of the Mughal court lived sequestered under purdah, the administration of their living quarters was run entirely by women.[245] The division of the administrative tasks was dictated largely by the vision of Akbar, who organized his zenana of over 5,000 noble women and servants.[246]

The women tasked with the protection of the zenana were commonly of Habshi, Tatar, Turk and Kashmiri origin. Kashmiri women were selected because they did not observe purdah. Many of the women were purchased as slaves, and trained for their positions.[247]

They are mentioned as early as the reigns of Babur and Humayun, and were proficient in weapons combat, specifically lance, and archery. Mughal emperors spent a great deal of their leisure time in the zenana, and slept there at night, therefore the women assigned to protect the women's quarters were also part of the larger system in place to protect the emperor.[248] During Babur, and Humayun's reign, when the Mughal throne was not sufficiently consolidated, the harem was mobile, following wherever the Emperor went next. Accordingly, it was necessary to have the range of trustworthy female guards and thus, the army of Urdubegis were constituted. They also followed the harem during excursions and sieges, and kept guard in the palace mansions were the Emperor's male soldiers were prohibited from entering. Many of these warriors, ascended the ranks, with time, or were granted a promotion by the Emperor in return for a favour. For instance, Bibi Fatima, the only known Urdubegi, was first a wet-nurse in Humayun's period, but was promoted to the rank of an Urdubegi by his son Akbar. [150]

From the large number of women, who have served as the Urdubegis under Mughal rule, we only know the name of one, that is Bibi Fatima. Her name is mentioned by Gulbadan-Begum, Humayun's half-sister who wrote his biography the Humayun-nama. It is interesting, how in all other biographies, written by male authors, we do not find exclusive mention of an Urdubegi.[249] In the wake of the colonial gaze interpreting history, the harem became a definite orientalist, and exotic space, from wherein the mention of the Urdubegis were removed. The harem came to largely symbolise the Mughal monarch's sexual playground, and its complexities were reduced under such a biased historical analysis.[250]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Zoya Ansari (24 December 2022). "Traveling mode of Mughal rulers". the weekender pk. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Roy 2011, p. 29.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Pradeep Barua (2005). Grimsley, Mark (ed.). The State at War in South Asia Studies in War, Society, and the Military. Ohio State University; University of Nebraska. p. 47. Retrieved 13 March 2024. Stephen Rosen's calculations show that even the most conservative figures for Indian soldiers percapita are at least as high as those for Europe at the end of the Thirty Years' War (1650), that is, 550,000, or 0.5 percent of a population of some 105 million (Europewest of the Urals, including Scandinavia, Britain, European Russia, Spain, and the Balkans). He also states that the actual numbers may be closer to ten times the inci- denceofsoldierspercapitainEuropeduringthatwar.Furthermore,insharp contrast to European states, the Mughals controlled only a small propor- tion of the total military forces in India. The Ain-i-Akbari gives the empire's total number of soldiers in the 1590s as 4.4 million, which includes local militia, consisting mainly of foot soldiers outside of Mughal control. This represents 3 percent of an estimated population of 135 million in 1600.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Abraham Eraly 2007, p. 300.
  5. ^ a b Lawrence E. Harrison, Peter L. Berger (2006). Developing cultures: case studies. Routledge. p. 158. ISBN 978-0-415-95279-8.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h Andrew de la Garza (2016). The Mughal Empire at War Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500-1605. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-317-24531-5. Retrieved 6 December 2023.
  7. ^ a b Stephen Peter Rosen (15 May 2019). Societies and Military Power India and Its Armies. Cornell University Press. ISBN 9781501744792. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  8. ^ Abdul Sabahuddin & Rajshree Shukla (2003, p. 199)
  9. ^ John D. Hosler; Alfred J. Andrea; Stephen Holt (2022). Seven Myths of Military History (Myths of History: A Hackett Series) (Hardcover). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. p. 40. ISBN 1647920442. Retrieved 15 March 2024.
  10. ^ Jeremy Black (1991). A Military Revolution?: Military Change and European Society 1550–1800 (Studies in European History, 14) (Hardcover). Red Globe Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0333519066. Retrieved 19 March 2024.
  11. ^ Hassan, Farhat (2004). State and Locality in Mughal India Power Relations in Western India, C.1572-1730 (Hardcover). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84119-1. Retrieved 8 July 2023. Others suggest that it was not artillery but cavalry that made the Mughals invincible in the
  12. ^ William Irvine (2007). Sarkar, Sir Jadunath (ed.). Later Mughals. University of Minnesota. p. 669. ISBN 978-969-35-1924-2. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  13. ^ a b John F. Richards (1993). "Part 1, Volume 5". The Mughal Empire (Paperback). Cambridge University Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-521-56603-2. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  14. ^ a b Roy, Atulchandra (1961). "Naval Strategy of the Mughals in Bengal". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 24: 170–175. JSTOR 44140736. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  15. ^ a b Alfred W. Crosby (8 April 2002). Throwing Fire Projectile Technology Through History (Hardcover). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-79158-8. Retrieved 6 December 2023.
  16. ^ a b Will Slatyer (20 February 2015). The Life/Death Rhythms of Capitalist Regimes - Debt Before Dishonour Timetable of World Dominance 1400-2100. Partridge Publishing Singapore. ISBN 978-1-4828-2961-7. Retrieved 6 December 2023. rockets were upgraded versions of Mughal rockets utilised during the Siege of Jinji by the progeny of the Nawab of Arcot
  17. ^ Pradeep Barua (2005, p. 318)
  18. ^ Rachel Dwyer (2016). Key Concepts in Modern Indian Studies. NYU Press. ISBN 978-1-4798-4869-0.
  19. ^ Kaushik Roy (3 June 2015). Warfare in Pre-British India - 1500BCE to 1740CE. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-58691-3.
  20. ^ Sita Ram Goel (1994). The Story of Islamic Imperialism in India.
  21. ^ Chaurasia, Radhey Shyam (2002). History of medieval India : from 1000 A.D. to 1707 A.D. New Delhi: Atlantic Publ. pp. 89–90. ISBN 81-269-0123-3.
  22. ^ Chaurasia, Radhey Shyam (2002). History of Medieval India: From 1000 A.D. to 1707 A.D. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. ISBN 978-81-269-0123-4.
  23. ^ Sharma, Gopi Nath (1954). Mewar & the Mughal Emperors (1526–1707 A.D.). S.L. Agarwala.
  24. ^ Keay, John (2000). India : A History. London: HarperCollins. p. 298. ISBN 0-00-255717-7.
  25. ^ Ali Khan 1925, p. 17-18.
  26. ^ Mehta, p. 164-165.
  27. ^ Ali Khan 1925, p. 18-19.
  28. ^ Schwartzberg, Joseph (1978). A Historical Atlas of South Asia. University of Chicago Press. p. 44. ISBN 0-19-506869-6.
  29. ^ a b c Others, Muzaffar H. Syed & (20 February 2022). History of Indian Nation : Medieval India. K. K. Publications.
  30. ^ Banerji 1938
  31. ^ a b c "Rule of Afghans". Banglapedia. Retrieved 16 August 2023.
  32. ^ Chandra 2007, p. 212-213.
  33. ^ Ali Khan 1925, p. 33.
  34. ^ Mehta, p. 167.
  35. ^ Mahajan 1968, p. 41.
  36. ^ Puri & Das 2003, p. 113.
  37. ^ Jenkins 2015, p. 64.
  38. ^ Bhattacherje 2009, p. 52.
  39. ^ Chandra 2007, p. 215-216.
  40. ^ a b Mehta, p. 168.
  41. ^ Ishwari Prasad (1942). A New History of India. Indian Press. p. 244. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
  42. ^ Ali Khan 1925, p. 34-36.
  43. ^ Chandra 2007, p. 216-217.
  44. ^ Mahajan 1968, p. 42.
  45. ^ Ali Khan 1925, p. 38-41.
  46. ^ Chandra 2007, p. 217.
  47. ^ Mehta, p. 169.
  48. ^ Afzal Husain and Afzal Husan (1981). "LIBERTY AND RESTRAINT—A STUDY OF SHIAISM IN THE MUGIAL NOBILITY". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 42: 276. JSTOR 44141140.
  49. ^ Sankaran, Sahaj. "22 June, 1555: Humayun Wins the Battle of Sirhind | Today in Indian History from Honesty Is Best". honestyisbest.com. Retrieved 29 August 2023.
  50. ^ "Battles for India at Sirhind". Times of India Blog. 18 March 2018. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
  51. ^ Toler, Pamela D. (February 2011). "An Untimely Death". Calliope. 21 (5): 3 – via EBSCOhost.
  52. ^ Eraly 2000, pp. 118–124
  53. ^ Chandra 2007, pp. 226–227
  54. ^ Chandra 2007, p. 227
  55. ^ a b c Richards 1996, pp. 9–13
  56. ^ a b c d e Richards 1996, pp. 14–15
  57. ^ Smith 2002, p. 339
  58. ^ Chandra 2007, p. 228
  59. ^ Richards 1996, pp. 17–21
  60. ^ a b c Chandra 2005, pp. 105–106
  61. ^ a b c Chisti, AA Sheikh Muhammad Asrarul Hoque (2012). "Isa Khan". In Sirajul Islam; Miah, Sajahan; Khanam, Mahfuza; Ahmed, Sabbir (eds.). Banglapedia: the National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Online ed.). Dhaka, Bangladesh: Banglapedia Trust, Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. ISBN 984-32-0576-6. OCLC 52727562. OL 30677644M. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
  62. ^ Shahnaj Husne Jahan. "Katrabo". Banglapedia: The National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka. Archived from the original on 16 April 2015. Retrieved 15 April 2015.
  63. ^ Sen, Dineshchandra (1988). The Ballads of Bengal. Vol. 2. Mittal Publications. p. 328.
  64. ^ Bosin, Yury V (2009). "Roshaniya movement and the Khan Rebellion". In Ness, Immanuel (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest. Blackwell Publishing. p. 2869. ISBN 9781405184649. Retrieved 23 November 2015.
  65. ^ a b c d Alam, Nadia; Al-Azhari, Ali Akbar; Ghani, Hafiz Abdul; Riaz, Muhammad (2023). "Muslim Deviant Thought And Reform Efforts By Muslim Scholars In Mughal Era". Journal of Positive School Psychology. 7 (4). Academic Social Research Research India: 1280. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  66. ^ Habib 1997, pp. 256–257
  67. ^ Habib 1997, p. 259
  68. ^ a b Richard Von Garbe (20 November 2014). Akbar, Emperor of India (Paperback). USA: Int'l Business Publications. p. 90. ISBN 978-1-4330-9412-5. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
  69. ^ Campbell 1896, p. 271.
  70. ^ Sudipta Mitra (2005). Gir Forest and the Saga of the Asiatic Lion. Indus Publishing. p. 14. ISBN 978-81-7387-183-2.
  71. ^ Campbell 1896, p. 266–267.
  72. ^ Campbell 1896, p. 269.
  73. ^ a b c Jadav, Joravarsinh (29 April 2012). "આશરા ધર્મને ઉજાગર કરતી સૌરાષ્ટ્રની સૌથી મોટી ભૂચર મોરીની લડાઇ - લોકજીવનનાં મોતી". Gujarat Samachar (in Gujarati). Archived from the original on 10 May 2016. Retrieved 10 May 2016.
  74. ^ a b c Edalji Dosábhai (1894). A History of Gujarát: From the Earliest Period to the Present Time. United Print. and General Agency. pp. 133–147.
  75. ^ a b "ગૌરવ ગાથા: ક્ષાત્રધર્મના પાલન માટે ખેલાયું ભૂચર મોરીનું યુધ્ધ". divyabhaskar (in Gujarati). 3 September 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2016.
  76. ^ Ranchhodji Diwan (1882). Târikh-i-Soraṭh: A History of the Provinces of Soraṭh and Hâlâr in Kâthiâwâd. Education Society Press, & Thacker. pp. 247–252.
  77. ^ DeshGujarat (3 September 2015). "A memorial dedicated to the battle of Bhuchar Mori ready to open". DeshGujarat. Retrieved 10 May 2016.
  78. ^ Asiatic Society of Bombay (1969). Journal. p. 153.
  79. ^ Fazl, Abu. "Victory Of The K. Azim M. Koka And The Disgrace Of Mozaffar Gujrati in The Akbarnama". Packard Humanities Institute. pp. 902–911. Archived from the original on 14 July 2018. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
  80. ^ Muzaffar H. Syed 1905, p. 141
  81. ^ Muzaffar H. Syed 1905, p. 166
  82. ^ Muzaffar H. Syed 1905, p. 166
  83. ^ Pawan singh (2022). Bangladesh and Pakistan Flirting with Failure in South Asia. gaurav book center. p. 21. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  84. ^ Feroz, M A Hannan (2009). 400 years of Dhaka. Ittyadi. p. 12.
  85. ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. p. 165. ISBN 978-93-80607-34-4.
  86. ^ Ali (1965), pp. 67–69.
  87. ^ Tripathi (1960), p. 367.
  88. ^ a b Ali (1954), p. 278.
  89. ^ Roy (1968), p. 62.
  90. ^ Rizvi (1969), p. 61.
  91. ^ Rizvi (1970), p. 61].
  92. ^ Roy (1968), p. 103.
  93. ^ Sarkar (1948), p. 275.
  94. ^ M. I. Borah (1936). Baharistan-I-Ghaybi – Volume 1. p. 163.
  95. ^ a b Roy (1968), p. 92.
  96. ^ a b Khan (2012).
  97. ^ Ali (1965), p. 67.
  98. ^ Roy (1968), pp. 103–04.
  99. ^ Rizvi (1970), p. 67.
  100. ^ Islam, Nazrul (16 April 2018). খাজা উসমান. Bangladesher Khabor (in Bengali).
  101. ^ Roy (1968), pp. 104–05.
  102. ^ Rizvi (1969), p. 60.
  103. ^ Hanif, N. (1999). Islamic Concept of Crime and Justice: Political justice and crime. New Delhi, India: Sarup & Sons. pp. 73–74. ISBN 978-81-7625-063-4. Archived from the original on 28 January 2023. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
  104. ^ Herbert, Sir Thomas (2012). Sir Thomas Herbert, Bart: Travels in Africa, Persia, and Asia the Great : Some Years Travels Into Africa and Asia the Great, Especially Describing the Famous Empires of Persia and Hindustan, as Also Divers Other Kingdoms in the Oriental Indies, 1627-30, the 1677 Version. New Delhi, India: ACMRS (Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies). p. 180. ISBN 978-0-86698-475-1.
  105. ^ a b Sekhara Bandyopadhyaya (2004). From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India. Orient Blackswan. p. 37. ISBN 978-81-250-2596-2.
  106. ^ Prasad 1930, p. 239 "Constant skirmishes were thinning the Rajput ranks ... [Amar Singh] offered to recognize Mughal supremacy ... Jahangir gladly and unreservedly accepted the terms."
  107. ^ Emperor, Jahangir (1999). The Jahangirnama. Freer Gallery of Art, Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution and Oxford University Press. pp. 116. ISBN 978-0-19-512718-8.
  108. ^ Emperor, Jahangir (1999). The Jahangirnama. Freer Gallery of Art, Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution and Oxford University Press. pp. 175. ISBN 978-0-19-512718-8.
  109. ^ Emperor, Jahangir (1999). The Jahangirnama. Freer Gallery of Art, Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution and Oxford University Press. pp. 192. ISBN 978-0-19-512718-8.
  110. ^ a b Malik, Zubair & Parveen 2016, p. 159-161.
  111. ^ Mitra, Swati (2009). Orchha, Travel Guide. Goodearth Publications. ISBN 978-81-87780-91-5.
  112. ^ Prasad 1974, p. 524: "[Aurangzeb] marched in the direction of Bijapur and on reaching Bidar laid siege to it.
  113. ^ Prasad 1974, p. 526: "Peace was made with the Sultan. He agreed ... to surrender to the Mughals the forts of Bidar, ..."
  114. ^ Chandra, Satish (1999). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. Vol. 2 (1st ed.). New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications. p. 321. OCLC 36806798.
  115. ^ Chandra, Satish (1999). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals. Vol. 2 (1st ed.). New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications. pp. 323–324. OCLC 36806798.
  116. ^ Kincaid, Dennis (1937). The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji, Founder of the Maratha Empire. London: Collins. p. 283.
  117. ^ Agrawal, Ashvini (1983). Studies in Mughal History. Motilal Banarsidass Publication. pp. 162–163. ISBN 978-81-208-2326-6.
  118. ^ Gascoigne, Bamber; Gascoigne, Christina (1971). The Great Moghuls. Cape. pp. 228–229. ISBN 978-0-224-00580-7.
  119. ^ Muzaffar H. Syed 1905, p. 166
  120. ^ Chandra, S. (2005). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals Part – II. Har-Anand Publications. p. 290. ISBN 978-81-241-1066-9. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
  121. ^ Vīrasiṃha, 2006, "The Jats: Their Role & Contribution to the Socio-economic Life and Polity of North & North-west India, Volume 2", Delhi: Originals , pp. 100–102.
  122. ^ Edward James Rap;son, Sir Wolseley Haig and Sir Richard, 1937, "The Cambridge History of India", Cambridge University Press, Volume 4, pp. 305.
  123. ^ Waldemar Hansen, 1986, "The Peacock Throne: The Drama of Mogul India", p. 454.
  124. ^ Reddy, 2005, "General Studies History for UPSC", Tata McGraw-Hill, p. B-46.
  125. ^ Catherine Ella Blanshard Asher, 1992, "Architecture of Mughal India – Part 1", Cambridge university Press, Vol. 4, p. 108.
  126. ^ Peck, Lucy (2008). Agra: The Architectural Heritage. Roli Books. ISBN 978-81-7436-942-0.
  127. ^ Sir Harry Hamilton Johnston, Leslie Haden Guest, 1937, The World of To-day: The Marvels of Nature and the Creations of Man, Vol. 2, p. 510
  128. ^ Havell, Ernest Binfield (1904). A Handbook to Agra and the Taj, Sikandra, Fatehpur-Sikri and the Neighbourhood. Longmans, Green, and Company. p. 75. ISBN 978-1-4219-8341-7.
  129. ^ Penfield, Frederic Courtland (1907). East to Suez Ceylon, India, China, and Japan. p. 179.
  130. ^ Maasir – I – Alamgiri. 1947.
  131. ^ Chisholm 1911, p. 927.
  132. ^ a b Charles Ralph Boxer (1969). The Portuguese Seaborne Empire, 1415-1825. Hutchinson. p. 136. Retrieved 17 March 2024.
  133. ^ Murray (1929). Handbook for Travellers in India, Burma and Ceylon Including AllBritish India, the Portuguese and French Possessions, and the Indian States. J. Murray. p. 579. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
  134. ^ Sarkar 1919, pp. 264–265.
  135. ^ Roy 2011, p. 37.
  136. ^ a b Salma Ahmed Farooqui (2011). A Comprehensive History of Medieval India Twelfth to the Mid-eighteenth Century. Pearson India Education Services. p. 177. ISBN 978-81-317-3202-1. Retrieved 12 March 2024.
  137. ^ B. D. Shastry; Teotonio R. De Souza (1989). Essays in Goan history: The Portuguese Commercial Relations with Bijapur in the Seventeenth Century. Concept Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd. pp. 39–48. ISBN 817022263X.
  138. ^ Sajjad Shahid (22 November 2011). "Mystic forces of Golconda Fort | Hyderabad News - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 20 June 2022.
  139. ^ Richards, J. F. (1975). "The Hyderabad Karnatik, 1687-1707". Modern Asian Studies. 9 (2): 241–260. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00004996. ISSN 0026-749X. JSTOR 311962. S2CID 142989123.
  140. ^ "Mughal Empire 1526-1707 by Sanderson Beck". San.beck.org. Retrieved 1 August 2012.
  141. ^ Jacques, Tony (26 June 2015). "Dictionary of Battles and Sieges". p. 395. Archived from the original on 26 June 2015. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  142. ^ a b c d e f V. D. Mahajan (2007). History of Medieval India (ebook). S. Chand. p. 215. ISBN 978-81-219-0364-6. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
  143. ^ Gascoigne, Bamber; Gascoigne, Christina (1971). The Great Moghuls. Cape. pp. 239–246. ISBN 978-0-224-00580-7.
  144. ^ Gordon, Stewart (1993). The Marathas 1600–1818 (1. publ. ed.). New York: Cambridge University. pp. 101–105. ISBN 978-0-521-26883-7. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  145. ^ H. C. Das; Indu Bhusan Kar (1988). Pani, Subas (ed.). Glimpses of History and Culture of Balasore. Orissa State Museum. p. 66. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
  146. ^ a b Temple of India foundation (2018). Bengal – India's Rebellious Spirit (ebook). Notion Press. pp. 449–450. ISBN 978-1-64324-746-5. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
  147. ^ Bhattacharya, Sudip (2014). Unseen Enemy The English, Disease, and Medicine in Colonial Bengal, 1617-1847 (ebook). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4438-6309-4. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
  148. ^ Safdar, Aiysha; Khan, Muhammad Azam (2021). "History of Indian Ocean-A south Indian perspective". Journal of Indian Studies. 7 (1): 186–188. The Empress, Mariam Zamani then ordered the building of an even larger ship with 62 guns and placements for over 400 musket men. It was named Ganj-i-Sawai, and it was in its day the most fearsome ship on the seas, and its objective was to trade and take pilgrims to Mecca, and on the way back convert all the goods sold into gold and silver as well as bring the pilgrims back. But then the English, posing as pirates, attacked with a 25-ship armada of alleged pirates. At Mecca, they claimed they were slave traders.
  149. ^ "Harking back: The Empress and her two doomed pilgrim ships". 11 April 2021.
  150. ^ a b c Findly, Ellison B. (1988). "The Capture of Maryam-uz-Zamānī's Ship: Mughal Women and European Traders". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 108 (2): 227–238. doi:10.2307/603650. ISSN 0003-0279. JSTOR 603650.
  151. ^ Findly, Ellison Banks. Nur Jahan Empress Of Mughal India. pp. 150–151.
  152. ^ "The trial of Joseph Dawson, Edward Forseith, William May, Wm. Bishop, James Lewis, and John Sparkes, at the Old-Bailey, for felony and piracy". A Complete Collection of State Trials and Proceedings for High Treason and Other Crimes and Misdemeanors. 13 (392, column 451). 1812.
  153. ^ a b c d e de la Garza, Andrew (February 2014). "Command of the Coast: The Mughal Navy and Regional Strategy". World History Connected. 12 (1). Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  154. ^ Richard M. Eaton (2023). The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204-1760 (ebook). University of California Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-520-91777-4. Retrieved 8 March 2024.
  155. ^ a b c Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra; Pusalker, A. D.; Majumdar, A. K., eds. (2007) [First published 1974]. The Mughal Empire. The History and Culture of the Indian People. Vol. VII. Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
  156. ^ Hasan 2012, p. 125.
  157. ^ a b Roy 2011, p. 13.
  158. ^ a b c d e f Hasan Askari, Syed (1961). "Mughal Naval Weakness and Aurangzeb's Attitude Towards the Traders and Pirates on the Western Coast". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 24: 163–170. JSTOR 44140735. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  159. ^ Kyd Nairne, Alexander (1988). History of the Konkan (Hardcover). Asian Educational Services. p. 69. ISBN 978-81-206-0275-5. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  160. ^ a b c Kaushik Roy; Peter Lorge (17 December 2014). Chinese and Indian Warfare - From the Classical Age to 1870 (ebook). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-317-58710-1. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
  161. ^ a b c Kaveh Yazdani (5 January 2017). India, Modernity and the Great Divergence Mysore and Gujarat (17th to 19th C.) (ebook). Brill. p. 258. ISBN 978-90-04-33079-5. Retrieved 24 November 2023. Akbar supposedly possessed 3000 vessels or boats. Later on, the amount was decreased to 768 armed cruisers ; (1618–1707) is said to have possessed four great vessels at Surat, the southern Gujarati port
  162. ^ Veevers, David (2020). The Origins of the British Empire in Asia, 1600-1750 (Hardcover ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 156. ISBN 978-1-108-48395-7. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  163. ^ a b c d e f g h Sarkar 1951, p. 243-244.
  164. ^ a b c d e f Francisco Bethencourt & Cátia A.P. Antunes 2022, p. 116.
  165. ^ Francisco Bethencourt & Cátia A.P. Antunes (2022, p. 115)
  166. ^ a b c João Vicente Melo 2022, p. 54.
  167. ^ Manjeet S. Pardesi (2017)
  168. ^ a b c d e Kaushik Roy (6 October 2015). Military Manpower, Armies and Warfare in South Asia (ebook). Taylor & Francis. pp. 65–66. ISBN 978-1-317-32128-6. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  169. ^ Mahajan V.D. (1991, reprint 2007). History of Medieval India, Part II, New Delhi: S. Chand, ISBN 81-219-0364-5, p.236
  170. ^ a b Muzaffar Alam; Sanjay Subrahmanyam ( (17 February 2011). The Mughal State: 1526-1750 (Oxford in India Readings: Them) (Oxford in India Readings: Themes in Indian History). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-565225-3.
  171. ^ Conermann, Stephan (4 August 2015), "Mughal Empire", Encyclopedia of Early Modern History Online, Brill, doi:10.1163/2352-0272_emho_com_024206, retrieved 28 March 2022
  172. ^ Abidin, Farah (2014). Suba of Kabul Under the Mughals: 1585-1739. Patridge Publishing India. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-4828-3938-8.
  173. ^ a b c Stephen P. Blake (30 April 2002). Shahjahanabad The Sovereign City in Mughal India 1639-1739 (Paperback). Cambridge University Press. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-521-52299-1. Retrieved 4 December 2023. ... Mughal emperor contained a great many persons . The only one of its kind , this elite mahallah served as the model ... walashahis ( belonging to the king ) or mansabdaran - i khassa ( special officeholders ) , were found in the emperor's ...
  174. ^ a b c d e Jos J. L. Gommans (2002). Mughal Warfare Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire, 1500-1700 (Paperback). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-23989-9. Retrieved 4 December 2023. ... walashahis, the most trusted bodyguard of the emperor and often associated with the ahadi contingent.49 Indeed, for any European observer, the precise difference between slaves and free retainers must have been rather obscure. For ...
  175. ^ Zahiruddin Malik (1977). The Reign Of Muhammad Shah 1919-1748. p. 298.
  176. ^ Robert Johnson (2018). True to Their Salt Indigenous Personnel in Western Armed Forces (Hardcover). Oxford University Press. p. 89. ISBN 9780190694562. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  177. ^ Muzaffar H. Syed 1905, p. 417
  178. ^ Disha Experts. Amazing Uttar Pradesh - General Knowledge for UPPSC, UPSSSC & other Competitive Exams (ebook). Disha Publications. p. 65. ISBN 9789390486724. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  179. ^ Jeremy Black (2023). A History of Artillery (ebook). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 117. ISBN 9781538178218. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  180. ^ The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Warfare From Ancient Egypt to Iraq (ebook). DK Publishing. p. 394. ISBN 9781465403735. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  181. ^ a b c d ANJU BALA (1 June 2018). "GRANDEUR OF THE MUGHAL'S MOVING COURT". Online Journal of Multidisciplinary Subjects. 12 (1). Department of History, University of Jammu: 1015–1019. ISSN 2349-266X. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  182. ^ Sinopoli, Carla M. (1994). "Monumentality and Mobility in Mughal Capitals". Asian Perspectives. 33 (2): 296 & 298. ISSN 0066-8435. JSTOR 42928323.
  183. ^ a b c d e f Jolen A Martinez (2020). Jordan, Avery (ed.). "Managing Mobility: New Materialist Approaches to Mughal Mobility in the Encampment and Constructed City". Rice Asian Studies Review. 4. Rice University Chao Center for Asian Studies: 29–34. Retrieved 13 March 2024. ...Mughal historiographical tradition has depicted the encampment as an example of its central Asian legacy, and a source of dynastic legitimacy as the descendants of conquest empires. In the court memoirs of emperors, such as the Baburnama, Humayunama, Akbarnama, and the Shah Jahanama, the authors made flexible narrative claims about their conquest histories and the ways of life that were conducive to massive land-based expansion. At the center of these narratives were references to the encampment as a site of military domination and troop mobility. The Mughal emperors relied upon the capacity to maneuver quickly and traced their command over mobile armies through lineages from Babur to Timur to Chinggis Khan. The camp called upon a firmly understood political tradition of mobility through its physical structure. ...In many historical accounts, Akbar's strategies to centralize authority to his figure coincided with the increasing permanence of the Mughal empire.19 Although these analyses rightfully point out Akbar's emphasis on establishing extensive administrative controls over his empire, this does not necessarily indicate a mutually exclusive relationship with early Mughal mobility. Akbar continued the long-standing traditions of his predecessors in marrying himself and his family into strategic political alliances.20 Whereas Timur married his children into the Chinggisid line, Akbar sought alliances with the Rajput rulers of Hindustan to solidify his control over the local kingdoms. He also created new revenue collection systems known as the khalisa, and installed a new mansab system to coordinate titles, rewards and iqtas (land allotments).21 Nevertheless, these centralizing policies also coincided with Akbar's continued use of the encampment to monitor the empire and address military-administrative pressures across his domain. Akbar expanded the camps of his predecessors in elaborate additions to Babur's highly mobile design. These changes were used by all subsequent Mughal rulers.22.... Akbar's entourage included small camps for journeys or hunting and large camps for royal tours and military campaigns, where over 300,000 people would reside.23 The emperor and his administration ruled the expanding Mughal empire from these camps.
  184. ^ a b c d Naseer Ahmad Mir (8 August 2017). "Description of Mughal Tents as a Temporary Capital" (PDF). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 7 (8). Centre of Advanced Study Department of History, Aligarh Muslim University: 668–670. ISSN 2250-3153. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  185. ^ Sayid Aulad Hasan (1903). Extracts from the Notes on the Antiquities of Dacca. Published by the author. p. 5.
  186. ^ "Alphabetical List of Monuments - Uttar Pradesh". Archaeological Survey of India, Government of India. Retrieved 13 November 2014.
  187. ^ Nelson, Dean (20 May 2011). "Delhi's Red Fort was originally white". The Daily Telegraph (UK).
  188. ^ "The Purana Qila, Delhi".
  189. ^ M. A. Nayeem (1985). Mughal Administration of Deccan Under Nizamul Mulk Asaf Jah, 1720-48 A.D. (Paperback). Jaico Publishing House. p. 78. ISBN 9788172243258. Retrieved 14 March 2024.
  190. ^ Maddison, Angus (25 September 2003). Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical Statistics. OECD Publishing. pp. 256–. ISBN 978-92-64-10414-3.
  191. ^ Art of Mughal Warfare." Art of Mughal Warfare. Indiannetzone, 25 August 2005.
  192. ^ J. C. Sharman (2019, p. 3)
  193. ^ Kaushik Roy (3 June 2015). Warfare in Pre-British India - 1500BCE to 1740CE (ebook). 9781317586920. p. 211. ISBN 978-1-317-58692-0. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
  194. ^ Jeremy Black (2000). War and the World Military Power and the Fate of Continents, 1450-2000 (Paperback). Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-08285-2. Retrieved 9 December 2023. ... Mughals paid insufficient attention to the quality of their firearms, they nevertheless maintained a formidable mixed-arms army. In 1647, the historian Abdul Hamid Lahori listed Mughal military strength as 200,000 stipendiary cavalry ...
  195. ^ Gahir & Spencer 2006, p. 156.
  196. ^ a b c Stone 2013, pp. 623–4.
  197. ^ Timothy Clifford (1983). A Century of Collecting, 1882–1982: A Guide to the Manchester City Art Galleries. Manchester City Art Gallery. ISBN 978-0-901673-20-6. Under the Mughals, Delhi and Lahore had been the most important centres for the production of military equipment.
  198. ^ Richard M. Eaton (2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-97423-4.
  199. ^ Jeremy Black (2001). Beyond the Military Revolution War in the Seventeenth Century World. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-350-30773-5.
  200. ^ Pius Malekandathi (2016). The Indian Ocean in the Making of Early Modern India. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-351-99746-1.
  201. ^ a b André Wink. The Making of the Indo-Islamic World c.700–1800 CE. University of Wisconsin, Madison: Cambridge University Press. pp. 165–166.
  202. ^ J.J.L. Gommans (2002). Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire 1500-1700. Taylor & Francis. p. 120. ISBN 978-1-134-55276-4.
  203. ^ William Irvine (1903). The army of the Indian Moghuls: its organization and administration. p. 64.
  204. ^ Rajesh Kadian (1990). India and Its Army. the University of Michigan. p. 132. ISBN 978-81-7094-049-4.
  205. ^ Altaf Alfroid David (1969). Know Your Armed Forces. Army Educational Stores. p. 13.
  206. ^ Azad Choudhary, R.B. (2017). "The Mughal and the Trading of Horses in India, 1526-1707" (PDF). International Journal of History and Cultural Studies. 3 (1). Hindu College, University of Delhi: 1–18. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
  207. ^ a b Sarkar 1960, p. 68.
  208. ^ Stephen Meredyth Edwardes, Herbert Leonard Offley Garrett (1995). Mughal rule in India. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. ISBN 978-81-7156-551-1.
  209. ^ Sarkar, Jadunath (1964). Fall Of The Mughal Empire Vol. 1. digitallibraryindia; JaiGyan. p. 254.
  210. ^ Srivastava, Ashirbadi Lal (1933). textsThe First Two Nawabs Of Oudh (a Critical Study Based On Original Sources) Approved For The Degree Of Ph. D. In The University Fo Lucknow In 1932.
  211. ^ William Irvine (1971). Later Mughal. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. p. 202.
  212. ^ Rajasthan Institute of Historical Research (1975). Journal of the Rajasthan Institute of Historical Research: Volume 12. Rajasthan Institute of Historical Research.
  213. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Mahout" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 424.
  214. ^ a b Mehta, JL. Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India (Paperback). Sterling Publishers Pvt Limited. p. 359. ISBN 978-81-207-1015-3. Retrieved 5 June 2023.
  215. ^ Nossov, Konstantin (2012). War Elephants (ebook). Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 45. ISBN 978-1-84603-803-7. Retrieved 5 June 2023.
  216. ^ Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire, 1500–1700, p. 122, at Google Books
  217. ^ a b c d e f Vikram Aggarwal (2020). Jordan, Avery (ed.). "An Elephant is Never Forgotten, The Mughals' Use ofElephants as a Means of Legitimizing Their Right to Rule" (PDF). Rice Asian Studies Review. 4. Rice University Chao Center for Asian Studies: 1–10. Retrieved 13 March 2024. ..elephants significance to Mughal leadership's right to rule, depicting how cultural symbols are co opted and repurposed and thus underscoring the dynamic nature of culture and power....In South Asia, elephants have been a symbol of power and reverence since the ancient Vedic times, as shown in the Arthashastra and Manusmriti
  218. ^ a b Jos J. L. Gommans (2002). Mughal Warfare Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire, 1500-1700 (Paperback). Routledge. pp. 125, 128. ISBN 978-0-415-23989-9. Retrieved 20 September 2023. (zamburak, shutarnal, shahin) that was attached to the saddle of the dromedary. These zamburaks were first mentioned by Bernier, who reports that Aurangzeb took two to three hundred camel- guns with him on his expedition to Kashmir
  219. ^ Rajendra Kumar Saxena (2002). Karkhanas of the Mughal Zamindars A Study in the Economic Development of 18th Century Rajputana. Publication Scheme. p. 35. ISBN 978-81-86782-75-0. Retrieved 8 March 2024.
  220. ^ a b c d e f Spessert, Robert D. (2019). "Review: Climate of Conquest War, Environment, and Empire in Mughal North India – Pratyay Nath, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2019, 368 pages". Military Review. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
  221. ^ Satish Chandra (January 0101). Medieval India Old NCERT Histroy [sic] Book Series for Civil Services Examination. Mocktime Publications.
  222. ^ André Wink. The Making of the Indo-Islamic World c.700–1800 CE. University of Wisconsin, Madison: Cambridge University Press. p. 164.
  223. ^ Satish Chandra (1959). Parties And Politics At The Mughal Court. Oxford University Press. p. 245.
  224. ^ Sir Jadunath Sarkar (1920). The Mughal Administration. p. 17. musketeers were mostly recruited from certain Hindu tribes , such as the Bundelas , the Karnatakis , and the men of Buxar
  225. ^ Ghosh, D. K. Ed. (1978). A Comprehensive History Of India Vol. 9. Orient Longmans. The Indian muslims looked down upon fighting with muskets and prided on sword play. The best gunners in the mughal army were hindus
  226. ^ William Irvine (2007). Later Muguhals. Sang-e-Meel Publications. p. 668.
  227. ^ J.J.L. Gommans (2022). Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire 1500-1700. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-134-55276-4.
  228. ^ Garza, Andrew de la (28 April 2016). The Mughal Empire at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500-1605. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-24530-8.
  229. ^ Andrew de la Garza (2016). The Mughal Empire at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500-1605. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-24530-8.
  230. ^ Andrew de la Garza (2016). The Mughal Empire at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-24531-5.
  231. ^ Abraham Elahy (2007). The Mughal World:Life in India's Last Golden Age. Penguin Books India. p. 291. ISBN 978-0-14-310262-5.
  232. ^ Sandhu (2003). A Military History of Medieval India. Vision Books. p. 657. ISBN 978-81-7094-525-3.
  233. ^ V. D. Mahajan (2007). History of Medieval India. Chand. p. 235. ISBN 978-81-219-0364-6.
  234. ^ Romesh C. Butalia (1998). The Evolution of the Artillery in India. Allied Publishers Limited. p. 300. ISBN 978-81-7023-872-0.
  235. ^ Irvine W. (1903). The Army Of The Indian Moghuls: Its Organization And Administration. Luzac. pp. 113–159.
  236. ^ Roy, Atul Chandra (1972). A History of Mughal Navy and Naval Warfares. World Press.
  237. ^ Kelly, Morgan; Ó Gráda, Cormac (2017). "Technological Dynamism in a Stagnant Sector: Safety at Sea during the Early Industrial Revolution" (PDF). UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series. UCD SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN: 10. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
  238. ^ Jadunath Sarkar (1985, p. 8, .... Nawwara ( Bengal war flotilla ))
  239. ^ a b c Nag, Sajal, ed. (2023). The Mughals and the North-East Encounter and Assimilation in Medieval India (Ebook). Manohar. ISBN 978-1-000-90525-0. Retrieved 4 July 2023.
  240. ^ a b MacDougall, Phillip (2014). Naval Resistance to Britain's Growing Power in India, 1660-1800 The Saffron Banner and the Tiger of Mysore (Hardcover). Boydell Press. pp. 28–34. ISBN 978-1-84383-948-4. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  241. ^ a b c James Talboys Wheeler (1881). The History of India from the Earliest Ages Volume 5. National Library of Scotland. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
  242. ^ Sharma, S. R. (1940). Mughal Empire in India: A Systematic Study Including Source Material. p. 11.
  243. ^ Bano, Shadab (2006). "MILITARY SLAVES IN MUGHAL INDIA". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 67: 350–57.
  244. ^ Khadija Tauseef (19 February 2024). "Urdubegis". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 13 March 2024.
  245. ^ Lal, K.S. (1988). The Mughal Harem. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan. pp. 14, 52–55. ISBN 81-85179-03-4.
  246. ^ Abu 'l-Fazl Allami (1977). Phillot, Lieut. Colonel D.C. (ed.). The Ain-i Akbari. Trans. H. Blochman. Delhi: Munishram Manoharlal. pp. 45–47. ISBN 978-81-86142-24-0.
  247. ^ Hambly, Gavin (1998). "Armed Women Retainers in the Zenanas of Indo-Muslim Rulers: The case of Bibi Fatima". Women in the medieval Islamic world : Power, patronage, and piety. New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 431–433. ISBN 0-312-21057-4.
  248. ^ Misra, Rekha (1967). Women in Mughal India (1526–1748). Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. pp. 79–80. OCLC 568760006.
  249. ^ Tauseef, Khadija (20 June 2022). "Urdubegis: The Forgotten Female Fighters of the Mughal Empire". Ancient Origins Reconstructing the story of humanity's past. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
  250. ^ enrouteI (22 October 2022). "The Urdubegis — Female Guards of the Zenana and the Mughal Emperor". Enroute Indian History. Retrieved 1 June 2023.

 This article incorporates text from The army of the Indian Moghuls: its organization and administration, by William Irvine, a publication from 1903, now in the public domain in the United States.

Sources


Further reading