Herbert Clark Hoover (August 10, 1874 – October 20, 1964) was an American engineer, businessman, and politician who served as the 31st president of the United States from 1929 to 1933. A member of the Republican Party, he held office during the onset of the Great Depression. Prior to serving as president, Hoover led the Commission for Relief in Belgium, served as the director of the U.S. Food Administration, and served as the 3rd U.S. Secretary of Commerce.
Born to a Quaker family in West Branch, Iowa, Hoover took a position with a London-based mining company after graduating from Stanford University in 1895. After the outbreak of World War I, he became the head of the Commission for Relief in Belgium, an international relief organization that provided food to occupied Belgium. When the U.S. entered the war, President Woodrow Wilson appointed Hoover to lead the Food Administration, and Hoover became known as the country’s “food czar”. After the war, Hoover led the American Relief Administration, which provided food to the inhabitants of Central Europe and Eastern Europe. Hoover’s war-time service made him a favorite of many progressives, and he unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination in the 1920 presidential election.
After the 1920 election, newly-elected Republican President Warren G. Harding appointed Hoover as Secretary of Commerce; Hoover continued to serve under President Calvin Coolidge after Harding died in 1923. Hoover was an unusually active and visible cabinet member, becoming known as “Secretary of Commerce and Under-Secretary of all other departments”. He was influential in the development of radio and air travel and led the federal response to the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927. Hoover won the Republican nomination in the 1928 presidential election, and decisively defeated the Democratic candidate, Al Smith. The stock market crashed shortly after Hoover took office, and the Great Depression became the central issue of his presidency. Hoover pursued a variety of policies in an attempt to lift the economy, but opposed directly involving the federal government in relief efforts.
In the midst of an ongoing economic crisis, Hoover was decisively defeated by Democratic nominee Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1932 presidential election. Hoover enjoyed one of the longest retirements of any former president, and he authored numerous works. After leaving office, Hoover became increasingly conservative, and he strongly criticized Roosevelt’s foreign policy and New Deal domestic agenda. In the 1940s and 1950s, Hoover’s public reputation was rehabilitated as he served for Presidents Harry S. Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower in various assignments, including as chairman of the Hoover Commission. Nevertheless, Hoover is generally not ranked highly in historical rankings of presidents of the United States.
Herbert Hoover was born on August 10, 1874 in West Branch, Iowa.[a] His father, Jesse Hoover, was a blacksmith and farm implement store owner of German, Swiss, and English ancestry. Hoover’s mother, Hulda Randall Minthorn, was raised in Norwich, Ontario, Canada, before moving to Iowa in 1859. Like most other citizens of West Branch, Jesse and Hulda were Quakers. As a child, Hoover consistently attended schools, but he did little reading on his own aside from the Bible. Hoover’s father, noted by the local paper for his “pleasant, sunshiny disposition”, died in 1880 at the age of 34. Hoover’s mother died in 1884, leaving Hoover, his older brother, Theodore, and his younger sister, May, as orphans.
In 1882, Hoover spent a year living at the Osage Agency in Pawhuska, Oklahoma with his aunt Agnes (Minthorn) Miles and uncle Laban J. Miles who was an U.S. Indian Agent. And in 1885, Hoover was sent to Newberg, Oregon to live with his uncle John Minthorn, a Quaker physician and businessman whose own son had died the year before. The Minthorn household was considered cultured and educational, and imparted a strong work ethic. Much like West Branch, Newberg was a frontier town settled largely by Midwestern Quakers. Minthorn ensured that Hoover received an education, but Hoover disliked the many chores assigned to him and often resented Minthorn. One observer described Hoover as “an orphan [who] seemed to be neglected in many ways.” Hoover attended Friends Pacific Academy (now George Fox University), but dropped out at the age of thirteen to become an office assistant for his uncle’s real estate office in Salem, Oregon. Though he did not attend high school, Hoover learned bookkeeping, typing, and mathematics at a night school.
Hoover entered Stanford University in 1891, its inaugural year, despite failing all the entrance exams except mathematics.[b] During his freshman year, he switched his major from mechanical engineering to geology after working for John Casper Branner, the chair of Stanford’s geology department. Hoover was a mediocre student, and he spent much of his time working in various part-time jobs or participating in campus activities. Though he was initially shy among fellow students, Hoover won election as student treasurer and became known for his distaste for fraternities and sororities. He served as student manager of both the baseball and football teams, and helped organize the inaugural Big Game versus the University of California. During the summers before and after his senior year, Hoover interned under economic geologist Waldemar Lindgren of the United States Geological Survey; these experience convinced Hoover to pursue a career as a mining geologist.
When Hoover graduated from Stanford in 1895, the country was in the midst of the Panic of 1893, and he initially struggled to find a job. He worked in various low-level mining jobs in the Sierra Nevada mountain range until he convinced prominent mining engineer Louis Janin to hire him. After working as a mine scout for a year, Hoover was hired by Bewick, Moreing & Co., a London-based company that operated gold mines in Western Australia. Hoover first went to Coolgardie, then the center of the Eastern Goldfields. Though Hoover received a $5,000 salary (equivalent to $150,580 in 2018), conditions were harsh in the goldfields. Hoover described the Coolgardie and Murchison rangelands on the edge of the Great Victoria Desert as a land of “black flies, red dust and white heat.”
Hoover traveled constantly across the Outback to evaluate and manage the company’s mines. He convinced Bewick, Moreing to purchase the Sons of Gwalia gold mine, which proved to be one of the most successful mines in the region. Partly due to Hoover’s efforts, the company eventually controlled approximately 50 percent of gold production in Western Australia. Hoover brought in many Italian immigrants to cut costs and counter the labour movement of the Australian miners. During his time with the mining company, Hoover became opposed to measures such as a minimum wage and workers’ compensation, feeling that they were unfair to owners. Hoover’s work impressed his employers, and in 1898 he was promoted to junior partner. An open feud developed between Hoover and his boss, Ernest Williams, but company leaders defused the situation by offering Hoover a compelling position in China.
Upon arriving in China, Hoover developed gold mines near Tianjin on behalf of Bewick, Moreing and the Chinese-owned Chinese Engineering and Mining Company. He became deeply interested in Chinese history, but quickly gave up on learning the language and viewed the Chinese people as racially inferior. He made recommendations to improve the lot of the Chinese worker, seeking to end the practice of imposing long-term servitude contracts and to institute reforms for workers based on merit. The Boxer Rebellion broke out shortly after Hoover arrived in China, trapping the Hoovers and numerous other foreign nationals until a multi-national force defeated Boxer forces in the Battle of Tientsin. Fearing the imminent collapse of the Chinese government, the director of the Chinese Engineering and Mining Company agreed to establish a new Sino-British venture with Bewick, Moreing. After Hoover and Bewick, Moreing established effective control over the new Chinese mining company, Hoover became the operating partner of Bewick, Moreing in late 1901.
As operating partner, Hoover continually traveled the world on behalf of Bewick, Moreing, visiting mines operated by the company on different continents. Beginning in December 1902, the company faced mounting legal and financial issues after one of the partners admitted to having fraudulently sold stock in a mine. More issues arose in 1904, after the British government formed two separate royal commission to investigate Bewick, Moreing’s labor practices and financial dealings in Western Australia. After the company lost a suit filed by the former director of the Chinese Engineering and Mining Company, Hoover began looking for a way to get out of the partnership, and he sold his shares in mid-1908.
After leaving Bewick, Moreing, Hoover worked as a London-based independent mining consultant and financier. Though he had risen to prominence as a geologist and mine operator, Hoover focused much of his attention on raising money, restructuring corporate organizations, and financing new ventures. He specialized in rejuvenating troubled mining operations, taking a share of the profits in exchange for his technical and financial expertise. Hoover thought of himself and his associates as “engineering doctors to sick concerns”, and he earned a reputation as a “doctor of sick mines”. He made investments on every continent and had offices in San Francisco, London, New York City, Paris, St. Petersburg (Florida), Florida, and Mandalay, Myanmar. By 1914, Hoover was a very wealthy man, with an estimated personal fortune of $4 million (equivalent to $100.05 million in 2018).
He co-founded the Zinc Corporation to extract zinc near the Australian city of Broken Hill. The Zinc Corporation developed the froth flotation process to extract zinc from lead-silver ore, and operated the world’s first selective or differential flotation plant. Hoover worked with the Burma Corporation, a British firm that produced silver, lead, and zinc in large quantities at the Namtu Bawdwin Mine.:90–96,101–102 He also helped increase copper production in Kyshtym, Russia, through the use of pyritic smelting. He also agreed to manage a separate mine in the Altai Mountains that, according to Hoover, “developed probably the greatest and richest single body of ore known in the world.”:102–108
In his spare time, Hoover wrote. His lectures at Columbia and Stanford universities were published in 1909 as Principles of Mining, which became a standard textbook. The book reflects his move towards progressive ideals, as Hoover came to endorse eight-hour workdays and organized labor. Hoover became deeply interested in the history of science, and he was especially drawn to the De re metallica, an influential 16th century work on mining and metallurgy. In 1912, Hoover and his wife published the first English translation of De re metallica. Hoover also joined the board of trustees at Stanford, and led a successful campaign to appoint John Branner as the university’s president.
Marriage and family
During his senior year at Stanford, Hoover became smitten with a classmate named Lou Henry, though his financial situation precluded marriage at that time. The daughter of a banker from Monterey, California, Lou Henry decided to study geology at Stanford after attending a lecture delivered by John Branner. Immediately after earning a promotion in 1898, Hoover cabled Lou Henry, asking her to marry him. After she cabled back her acceptance of the proposal, Hoover briefly returned to the United States for their wedding. They would remain married until Lou Henry’s death in 1944. Though his Quaker upbringing strongly influenced his career, Hoover rarely attended Quaker meetings during his adult life. Hoover and his wife had two children: Herbert Hoover Jr. (born in 1903) and Allan Henry Hoover (born in 1907). The Hoover family began living in London in 1902, though they frequently traveled as part of Hoover’s career. After 1916, the Hoovers began living in the United States, maintaining homes in Palo Alto, California and Washington, D.C.
World War I and aftermath
Relief in Europe
World War I broke out in June 1914, pitting the Allied Powers (France, Russia, Britain, and other countries) against the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and other countries). Hoover and other London-based American businessmen established a committee to organize the return of the roughly 100,000 Americans stranded in Europe. Hoover was appointed as the committee’s chair and, with the assent of Congress and the executive branch, took charge of the distribution of relief to Americans in Europe. Hoover later stated, “I did not realize it at the moment, but on August 3, 1914, my career was over forever. I was on the slippery road of public life.” By early October 1914, Hoover’s organization had distributed relief to at least 40,000 Americans.
The German invasion of Belgium in August 1914 set off a food crisis in Belgium, which relied heavily on food imports. The Germans refused to take responsibility for feeding Belgian citizens in captured territory, and the British refused to lift their blockade of German-occupied Belgium unless the U.S. government supervised Belgian food imports as a neutral party in the war. With the cooperation of the Wilson administration and the CNSA, a Belgian relief organization, Hoover established the Commission for Relief in Belgium (CRB). The CRB obtained and imported millions of tons of foodstuffs for the CNSA to distribute, and helped ensure that the German army did not appropriate the food. Private donations and government grants supplied the majority of its $11-million-a-month budget, and the CRB became a veritable independent republic of relief, with its own flag, navy, factories, mills, and railroads. A British official described the CRB as a “piratical state organized for benevolence.”
Hoover worked 14-hour days from London, administering the distribution of over two million tons of food to nine million war victims. In an early form of shuttle diplomacy, he crossed the North Sea forty times to meet with German authorities and persuade them to allow food shipments. He also convinced British Chancellor of the Exchequer David Lloyd George to allow individuals to send money to the people of Belgium, thereby lessening workload of the CRB. At the request of the French government, the CRB began delivering supplies to the people of Northern France in 1915. American diplomat Walter Page described Hoover as “probably the only man living who has privately (i.e., without holding office) negotiated understandings with the British, French, German, Dutch, and Belgian governments.”
U.S. Food Administration
The United States declared war upon Germany in April 1917 after Germany engaged in unrestricted submarine warfare against American vessels in British waters. With the U.S. mobilizing for war, President Woodrow Wilson appointed Hoover to head the U.S. Food Administration, which was charged with ensuring the nation’s food needs during the war. Hoover had hoped to join the administration in some capacity since at least 1916, and he obtained the position after lobbying several members of Congress and Wilson’s confidant, Edward M. House. Earning the appellation of “food czar”, Hoover recruited a volunteer force of hundreds of thousands of women and deployed propaganda in movie theaters, schools, and churches. He carefully selected men to assist in the agency leadership—Alonzo Taylor (technical abilities), Robert Taft (political associations), Gifford Pinchot (agricultural influence), and Julius Barnes (business acumen).
World War I had created a global food crisis that dramatically increased food prices and caused food riots and starvation in the countries at war. Hoover’s chief goal as food czar was to provide supplies to the Allied Powers, but he also sought to stabilize domestic prices and to prevent domestic shortages. Under the broad powers granted by the Food and Fuel Control Act, the Food Administration supervised food production throughout the United States, and the administration made use of its authority to buy, import, store, and sell food. Determined to avoid rationing, Hoover established set days for people to avoid eating specified foods and save them for soldiers’ rations: meatless Mondays, wheatless Wednesdays, and “when in doubt, eat potatoes”. These policies were dubbed “Hooverizing” by government publicists, in spite of Hoover’s continual orders that publicity should not mention him by name. The Food Administration shipped 23 million metric tons of food to the Allied Powers, preventing their collapse and earning Hoover great acclaim. As head of the Food Administration, Hoover gained a following in the United States, especially among progressives who saw in Hoover an expert administrator and symbol of efficiency.
World War I came to an end in November 1918, but Europe continued to face a critical food situation; Hoover estimated that as many as 400 million people faced the possibility of starvation. The United States Food Administration became the American Relief Administration (ARA), and Hoover was charged with providing food to Central and Eastern Europe. In addition to providing relief, the ARA rebuilt infrastructure in an effort to rejuvenate the economy of Europe. Throughout the Paris Peace Conference, Hoover served as a close adviser to President Wilson, and he largely shared Wilson’s goals of establishing the League of Nations, settling borders on the basis of self-determination, and refraining from inflicting a harsh punishment on the defeated Central Powers. The following year, famed British economist John Maynard Keynes wrote in The Economic Consequences of the Peace that if Hoover’s realism, “knowledge, magnanimity and disinterestedness” had found wider play in the councils of Paris, the world would have had “the Good Peace.” After U.S. government funding for the ARA expired in mid-1919, Hoover transformed the ARA into a private organization, raising millions of dollars from private donors. He also established the European Children’s Fund, which provided relief to fifteen million children across fourteen countries.
Despite the opposition of Senator Henry Cabot Lodge and other Republicans, Hoover provided aid to the defeated German nation after the war, as well as relief to famine-stricken Bolshevik-controlled areas of Russia. Hoover condemned Bolshevism, but warned President Wilson against an intervention in Russia, as he viewed the White Russian forces as little better than the Bolsheviks and feared the possibility of a protracted U.S. involvement. The Russian famine of 1921–22 claimed six million people, but the intervention of the ARA likely saved millions of lives. When asked if he was not helping Bolshevism by providing relief, Hoover stated, “twenty million people are starving. Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!” Reflecting the gratitude of many Europeans, in July 1922, Soviet author Maxim Gorky told Hoover that “your help will enter history as a unique, gigantic achievement, worthy of the greatest glory, which will long remain in the memory of millions of Russians whom you have saved from death.”
In 1919, Hoover established the Hoover War Collection at Stanford University. He donated all the files of the Commission for Relief in Belgium, the U.S. Food Administration, and the American Relief Administration, and pledged $50,000 as an endowment (equivalent to $722,553 in 2018). Scholars were sent to Europe to collect pamphlets, society publications, government documents, newspapers, posters, proclamations, and other ephemeral materials related to the war and the revolutions that followed it. The collection was renamed the Hoover War Library in 1922 and is now known as the Hoover Institution. During the post-war period, Hoover also served as the president of the Federated American Engineering Societies.
Hoover had been little known among the American public before 1914, but his service in the Wilson administration established him as a contender in the 1920 presidential election. Hoover’s wartime push for higher taxes, criticism of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer‘s actions during the First Red Scare, and his advocacy for measures such as the minimum wage, forty-eight-hour workweek, and elimination of child labor made him appealing to progressives of both parties. Despite his service in the Democratic administration of Woodrow Wilson, Hoover had never been closely affiliated with either the Democrats or the Republicans. He initially sought to avoid committing to any party in the 1920 election, hoping that either of the two major parties would draft him for president at their respective national convention. In March 1920, he changed his strategy and declared himself to be a Republican; he was motivated in large part by the belief that the Democratic candidate would have little chance of winning the 1920 presidential election. Despite his national renown, Hoover’s service in the Wilson administration had alienated farmers and the conservative Old Guard of the GOP, and his presidential candidacy fizzled out after his defeat in the California primary by favorite son Hiram Johnson. At the 1920 Republican National Convention, Warren G. Harding emerged as a compromise candidate after the convention became deadlocked between supporters of Johnson, Leonard Wood, and Frank Orren Lowden. Hoover backed Harding’s successful campaign in the general election, and he began laying the groundwork for a future presidential run by building up a base of strong supporters in the Republican Party.
Secretary of Commerce
After his election as president in 1920, Harding rewarded Hoover for his support, offering to appoint him as either Secretary of the Interior or Secretary of Commerce. Secretary of Commerce was considered a minor Cabinet post, with limited and vaguely defined responsibilities, but Hoover decided to accept the position. Hoover’s progressive stances, continuing support for the League of Nations, and recent conversion to the Republican Party aroused opposition to his appointment from many Senate Republicans. To overcome this opposition, Harding paired Hoover’s nomination with that of conservative favorite Andrew Mellon as Secretary of the Treasury, and the nominations of both Hoover and Mellon were confirmed by the Senate. Hoover would serve as Secretary of Commerce from 1921 to 1929, serving under Harding and, after Harding’s death in 1923, President Calvin Coolidge. While some of the most prominent members of the Harding administration, including Attorney General Harry M. Daugherty and Secretary of Interior Albert B. Fall, were implicated in major scandals, Hoover emerged largely unscathed from investigations into the Harding administration.
Hoover envisioned the Commerce Department as the hub of the nation’s growth and stability. His experience mobilizing the war-time economy convinced him that the federal government could promote efficiency by eliminating waste, increasing production, encouraging the adoption of data-based practices, investing in infrastructure, and conserving natural resources. Contemporaries described Hoover’s approach as a “third alternative” between “unrestrained capitalism” and socialism, which was becoming increasingly popular in Europe. Hoover sought to foster a balance among labor, capital, and the government, and for this he has been variously labeled a corporatist or an associationalist.
Hoover demanded, and received, authority to coordinate economic affairs throughout the government. He created many sub-departments and committees, overseeing and regulating everything from manufacturing statistics to air travel. In some instances he “seized” control of responsibilities from other Cabinet departments when he deemed that they were not carrying out their responsibilities well; some began referring to him as the “Secretary of Commerce and Under-Secretary of all other departments.” In response to the Depression of 1920–21, he convinced Harding to assemble a presidential commission on unemployment, which encouraged local governments to engage in countercyclical infrastructure spending. He endorsed much of Mellon’s tax reduction program, but favored a more progressive tax system and opposed the treasury secretary’s efforts to eliminate the estate tax.
Radio and travel
Between 1923 and 1929, the number of families with radios grew from 300,000 to 10 million, and Hoover’s tenure as Secretary of Commerce heavily influenced radio use in the United States. In the early and mid-1920s, Hoover’s radio conferences played a key role in the organization, development, and regulation of radio broadcasting. Hoover also helped pass the Radio Act of 1927, which allowed the government to intervene and abolish radio stations that were deemed “non-useful” to the public. Hoover’s attempts at regulating radio were not supported by all congressmen, and he received much opposition from the Senate and from radio station owners.[page needed]
Hoover was also influential in the early development of air travel, and he sought to create a thriving private industry boosted by indirect government subsidies. He encouraged the development of emergency landing fields, required all runways to be equipped with lights and radio beams, and encouraged farmers to make use of planes for crop dusting. He also established the federal government’s power to inspect planes and license pilots, setting a precedent for the later Federal Aviation Administration.
As Commerce Secretary, Hoover hosted national conferences on street traffic collectively known as the National Conference on Street and Highway Safety. Hoover’s chief objective was to address the growing casualty toll of traffic accidents, but the scope of the conferences grew and soon embraced motor vehicle standards, rules of the road, and urban traffic control. He left the invited interest groups to negotiate agreements among themselves, which were then presented for adoption by states and localities. Because automotive trade associations were the best organized, many of the positions taken by the conferences reflected their interests. The conferences issued a model Uniform Vehicle Code for adoption by the states, and a Model Municipal Traffic Ordinance for adoption by cities. Both were widely influential, promoting greater uniformity between jurisdictions and tending to promote the automobile’s priority in city streets.
With the goal of encouraging wise business investments, Hoover made the Commerce Department a clearinghouse of information. He recruited numerous academics from various fields and tasked them with publishing reports on different aspects of the economy, including steel production and films. To eliminate waste, he encouraged standardization of products like automobile tires and baby bottle nipples. Other efforts at eliminating waste included reducing labor losses from trade disputes and seasonal fluctuations, reducing industrial losses from accident and injury, and reducing the amount of crude oil spilled during extraction and shipping. He promoted international trade by opening overseas offices to advise businessmen. Hoover was especially eager to promote Hollywood films overseas. His “Own Your Own Home” campaign was a collaboration to promote ownership of single-family dwellings, with groups such as the Better Houses in America movement, the Architects’ Small House Service Bureau, and the Home Modernizing Bureau. He worked with bankers and the savings and loan industry to promote the new long-term home mortgage, which dramatically stimulated home construction. Other accomplishments included winning the agreement of U.S. Steel to adopt an eight-hour workday, and the fostering of the Colorado River Compact, a water rights compact among Southwestern states.
The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 broke the banks and levees of the lower Mississippi River in early 1927, resulting in the flooding of millions of acres and leaving 1.5 million people displaced from their homes. Although disaster response did not fall under the duties of the Commerce Department, the governors of six states along the Mississippi River specifically asked President Coolidge to appoint Hoover to coordinate the response to the flood. Believing that disaster response was not the domain of the federal government, Coolidge initially refused to become involved, but he eventually acceded to political pressure and appointed Hoover to chair a special committee to help the region. Hoover established over one hundred tent cities and a fleet of more than six hundred vessels, and raised $17 million (equivalent to $245.2 million in 2018). In large part due to his leadership during the flood crisis, by 1928, Hoover had begun to overshadow President Coolidge himself. Though Hoover received wide acclaim for his role in the crisis, he ordered the suppression of reports of mistreatment of African Americans in refugee camps. He did so with the cooperation of African-American leader Robert Russa Moton, who was promised unprecedented influence once Hoover became president.
Presidential election of 1928
Hoover quietly built up support for a future presidential bid throughout the 1920s, but he carefully avoided alienating Coolidge, who was eligible to run for another term in the 1928 presidential election. Along with the rest of the nation, he was surprised when Coolidge announced in August 1927 that he would not seek another term. With the impending retirement of Coolidge, Hoover immediately emerged as the front-runner for the 1928 Republican nomination, and he quickly put together a strong campaign team led by Hubert Work, Will H. Hays, and Reed Smoot. Coolidge was unwilling to anoint Hoover as his successor; on one occasion he remarked that, “for six years that man has given me unsolicited advice—all of it bad.” Despite his lukewarm feelings towards Hoover, Coolidge had no desire to split the party by publicly opposing the popular Commerce Secretary’s candidacy.
Many wary Republican leaders cast about for an alternative candidate, such as Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon or former Secretary of State Charles Evans Hughes. However, Hughes and Mellon declined to run, and other potential contenders like Frank Orren Lowden and Vice President Charles G. Dawes failed to garner widespread support. Hoover won the presidential nomination on the first ballot of the 1928 Republican National Convention. Convention delegates considered re-nominating Vice President Charles Dawes to be Hoover’s running mate, but Coolidge, who hated Dawes, remarked that this would be “a personal affront” to him. The convention instead selected Senator Charles Curtis of Kansas. Hoover accepted the nomination at Stanford Stadium, telling a huge crowd that he would continue the policies of the Harding and Coolidge administrations. The Democrats nominated New York governor Al Smith, who became the first Catholic major party nominee for president.
Hoover centered his campaign around the Republican record of peace and prosperity, as well as his own reputation as a successful engineer and public official. Averse to giving political speeches, Hoover largely stayed out of the fray and left the campaigning to Curtis and other Republicans. Smith was more charismatic and gregarious than Hoover, but his campaign was damaged by anti-Catholicism and his overt opposition to Prohibition. Hoover had never been a strong proponent of Prohibition, but he accepted the Republican Party’s plank in favor of it and issued an ambivalent statement calling Prohibition “a great social and economic experiment, noble in motive and far-reaching in purpose.” In the South, Hoover and the national party pursued a “lily-white” strategy, removing black Republicans from leadership positions in an attempt to curry favor with white Southerners.
Hoover maintained polling leads throughout the 1928 campaign, and he decisively defeated Smith on election day, taking 58 percent of the popular vote and 444 of the 531 electoral votes. Historians agree that Hoover’s national reputation and the booming economy, combined with deep splits in the Democratic Party over religion and Prohibition, guaranteed his landslide victory. Hoover’s appeal to Southern white voters succeeded in cracking the “Solid South“, and he won five Southern states. Hoover’s victory was positively received by newspapers; one wrote that Hoover would “drive so forcefully at the tasks now before the nation that the end of his eight years as president will find us looking back on an era of prodigious achievement.”
Hoover’s detractors wondered why he did not do anything to reapportion congress after the 1920 United States Census which saw an increase in urban and immigrant populations. The 1920 Census was the first and only Decennial Census where the results were not used to reapportion Congress, which ultimately influenced the 1928 Electoral College and impacted the Presidential Election.
Hoover saw the presidency as a vehicle for improving the conditions of all Americans by encouraging public-private cooperation—what he termed “volunteerism”. He tended to oppose governmental coercion or intervention, as he thought they infringed on American ideals of individualism and self-reliance. The first major bill that he signed, the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1929, established the Federal Farm Board in order to stabilize farm prices. Hoover made extensive use of commissions to study issues and propose solutions, and many of those commissions were sponsored by private donors rather than by the government. One of the commissions started by Hoover, the Research Committee on Social Trends, was tasked with surveying the entirety of American society. He appointed a Cabinet consisting largely of wealthy, business-oriented conservatives, including Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon. Lou Henry Hoover was an activist First Lady. She typified the new woman of the post-World War I era: intelligent, robust, and aware of multiple female possibilities.
On taking office, Hoover said that “given the chance to go forward with the policies of the last eight years, we shall soon with the help of God, be in sight of the day when poverty will be banished from this nation.” Having seen the fruits of prosperity brought by technological progress, many shared Hoover’s optimism, and the already bullish stock market climbed even higher on Hoover’s accession. This optimism concealed several threats to sustained U.S. economic growth, including a persistent farm crisis, a saturation of consumer goods like automobiles, and growing income inequality. Most dangerous of all to the economy was excessive speculation that had raised stock prices far beyond their value. Some regulators and bankers had warned Coolidge and Hoover that a failure to curb speculation would lead to “one of the greatest financial catastrophes that this country has ever seen,” but both presidents were reluctant to become involved with the workings of the Federal Reserve System, which regulated banks.
In late October 1929, the Stock Market Crash of 1929 occurred, and the worldwide economy began to spiral downward into the Great Depression. The causes of the Great Depression remain a matter of debate, but Hoover viewed a lack of confidence in the financial system as the fundamental economic problem facing the nation. He sought to avoid direct federal intervention, believing that the best way to bolster the economy was through the strengthening of businesses such as banks and railroads. He also feared that allowing individuals on the “dole” would permanently weaken the country. Instead, Hoover strongly believed that local governments and private giving should address the needs of individuals.
Though he attempted to put a positive spin on Black Tuesday, Hoover moved quickly to address the stock market collapse. In the days following Black Tuesday, Hoover gathered business and labor leaders, asking them to avoid wage cuts and work stoppages while the country faced what he believed would be a short recession similar to the Depression of 1920–21. Hoover also convinced railroads and public utilities to increase spending on construction and maintenance, and the Federal Reserve announced that it would cut interest rates. In early 1930, Hoover acquired from Congress an additional $100 million to continue the Federal Farm Board lending and purchasing policies. These actions were collectively designed to prevent a cycle of deflation and provide a fiscal stimulus. At the same time, Hoover opposed congressional proposals to provide federal relief to the unemployed, as he believed that such programs were the responsibility of state and local governments and philanthropic organizations.
Hoover had taken office hoping to raise agricultural tariffs in order to help farmers reeling from the farm crisis of the 1920s, but his attempt to raise agricultural tariffs became connected with a bill that broadly raised tariffs. Hoover refused to become closely involved in the congressional debate over the tariff, and Congress produced a tariff bill that raised rates for many goods. Despite the widespread unpopularity of the bill, Hoover felt that he could not reject the main legislative accomplishment of the Republican-controlled 71st Congress. Over the objection of many economists, Hoover signed the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act into law in June 1930. Canada, France, and other nations retaliated by raising tariffs, resulting in a contraction of international trade and a worsening of the economy. Progressive Republicans such as Senator William E. Borah were outraged when Hoover signed the tariff act, and Hoover’s relations with that wing of the party never recovered.
By the end of 1930, the national unemployment rate had reached 11.9 percent, but it was not yet clear to most Americans that the economic downturn would be worse than the Depression of 1920–21. A series of bank failures in late 1930 heralded a larger collapse of the economy in 1931. While other countries left the gold standard, Hoover refused to abandon it; he derided any other monetary system as “collectivism.” Hoover viewed the weak European economy as a major cause of economic troubles in the United States. In response to the collapse of the German economy, Hoover marshaled congressional support behind a one-year moratorium on European war debts. The Hoover Moratorium was warmly received in Europe and the United States, but Germany remained on the brink of defaulting on its loans. As the worldwide economy worsened, democratic governments fell; in Germany, Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler assumed power.
By mid-1931, the unemployment rate had reached 15 percent, giving rise to growing fears that the country was experiencing a depression far worse than recent economic downturns. A reserved man with a fear of public speaking, Hoover allowed his opponents in the Democratic Party to define him as cold, incompetent, reactionary, and out-of-touch. Hoover’s opponents developed defamatory epithets to discredit him such as: “Hooverville” (the shanty towns and homeless encampments), “Hoover leather” (cardboard used to cover holes in the soles of shoes), and “Hoover blanket” (old newspaper used to cover oneself from the cold). While Hoover continued to resist direct federal relief efforts, Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt of New York launched the Temporary Emergency Relief Administration to provide aid to the unemployed. Democrats positioned the program as a kinder alternative to Hoover’s alleged apathy towards the unemployed.
The economy continued to worsen, with unemployment rates nearing 23 percent in early 1932, and Hoover finally heeded calls for more direct federal intervention. In January 1932, he convinced Congress to authorize the establishment of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC), which would provide government-secured loans to financial institutions, railroads, and local governments.  The RFC saved numerous businesses from failure, but it failed to stimulate commercial lending as much as Hoover had hoped, partly because it was run by conservative bankers unwilling to make riskier loans. The same month the RFC was established, Hoover signed the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, establishing 12 district banks overseen by a Federal Home Loan Bank Board in a manner similar to the Federal Reserve System. He also helped arrange passage of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1932, emergency banking legislation designed to expand banking credit by expanding the collateral on which Federal Reserve banks were authorized to lend. As these measures failed to stem the economic crisis, Hoover signed the Emergency Relief and Construction Act, a $2 billion public works bill, in July 1932.
After a decade of budget surpluses, the federal government experienced a budget deficit in 1931. Though some economists, like William Trufant Foster, favored deficit spending to address the Great Depression, most politicians and economists believed in the necessity of keeping a balanced budget. In late 1931, Hoover proposed a tax plan to increase tax revenue by 30 percent, resulting in the passage of the Revenue Act of 1932. The act increased taxes across the board, rolling back much of the tax cut reduction program Mellon had presided over during the 1920s. Top earners were taxed at 63 percent on their net income, the highest rate since the early 1920s. The act also doubled the top estate tax rate, cut personal income tax exemptions, eliminated the corporate income tax exemption, and raised corporate tax rates. Despite the passage of the Revenue Act, the federal government continued to run a budget deficit.
Civil rights and Mexican Repatriation
Hoover seldom mentioned civil rights while he was president. He believed that African Americans and other races could improve themselves with education and individual initiative.[page needed] Hoover appointed more African Americans to federal positions than Harding and Coolidge had combined, but many African-American leaders condemned various aspects of the Hoover administration, including Hoover’s unwillingness to push for a federal anti-lynching law. Hoover also continued to pursue the lily-white strategy, removing African Americans from positions of leadership in the Republican Party in an attempt to end the Democratic Party’s dominance in the South. Though Robert Moton and some other black leaders accepted the lily-white strategy as a temporary measure, most African-American leaders were outraged. Hoover further alienated black leaders by nominating conservative Southern judge John J. Parker to the Supreme Court; Parker’s nomination ultimately failed in the Senate due to opposition from the NAACP and organized labor. Many black voters switched to the Democratic Party in the 1932 election, and African Americans would later become an important part of Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal coalition.
As part of his efforts to limit unemployment, Hoover sought to cut immigration to the United States, and in 1930 he promulgated an executive order requiring individuals to have employment before migrating to the United States. With the goal of opening up more jobs for U.S. citizens, Secretary of Labor William N. Doak began a campaign to prosecute illegal immigrants in the United States. Though Doak did not seek to deport one specific group of immigrants, his campaign most strongly affected Mexican Americans, especially Mexican Americans living in Southern California. Many of the deportations were overseen by state and local authorities who acted on the encouragement of Doak the and Department of Labor. During the 1930s, approximately one million Mexican Americans were forcibly “repatriated” to Mexico; approximately sixty percent of those deported were birthright citizens. According to legal professor Kevin R. Johnson, the repatriation campaign meets the modern legal standards of ethnic cleansing, as it involved the forced removal of a racial minority by government actors.
On taking office, Hoover urged Americans to obey the Eighteenth Amendment and the Volstead Act, which had established Prohibition across the United States. To make public policy recommendations regarding Prohibition, he created the Wickersham Commission. Hoover had hoped that the commission’s public report would buttress his stance in favor of Prohibition, but the report criticized the enforcement of the Volstead Act and noted the growing public opposition to Prohibition. After the Wickersham Report was published in 1931, Hoover rejected the advice of some of his closest allies and refused to endorse any revision of the Volstead Act or the Eighteenth Amendment, as he feared doing so would undermine his support among Prohibition advocates. As public opinion increasingly turned against Prohibition, more and more people flouted the law, and a grassroots movement began working in earnest for Prohibition’s repeal. In January 1933, a constitutional amendment repealing the Eighteenth Amendment was approved by Congress and submitted to the states for ratification. By December 1933, it had been ratified by the requisite number of states to become the Twenty-first Amendment.
According to Leuchtenburg, Hoover was “the last American president to take office with no conspicuous need to pay attention to the rest of the world”. Nevertheless, during Hoover’s term, the world order established in the immediate aftermath of World War I began to crumble. As president, Hoover largely made good on his pledge made prior to assuming office not to interfere in Latin America‘s internal affairs. In 1930, he released the Clark Memorandum, a rejection of the Roosevelt Corollary and a move towards non-interventionism in Latin America. Hoover did not completely refrain from the use of the military in Latin American affairs; he thrice threatened intervention in the Dominican Republic, and he sent warships to El Salvador to support the government against a left-wing revolution. Notwithstanding those actions, he wound down the Banana Wars, ending the occupation of Nicaragua and nearly bringing an end to the occupation of Haiti.
Hoover placed a priority on disarmament, which he hoped would allow the United States to shift money from the military to domestic needs. Hoover and Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson focused on extending the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty, which sought to prevent a naval arms race. As a result of Hoover’s efforts, the United States and other major naval powers signed the 1930 London Naval Treaty. The treaty represented the first time that the naval powers had agreed to cap their tonnage of auxiliary vessels, as previous agreements had only affected capital ships. At the 1932 World Disarmament Conference, Hoover urged further cutbacks in armaments and the outlawing of tanks and bombers, but his proposals were not adopted.
In 1931, Japan invaded Manchuria, defeating the Republic of China‘s military forces and establishing Manchukuo, a puppet state. The Hoover administration deplored the invasion, but also sought to avoid antagonizing the Japanese, fearing that taking too strong a stand would weaken the moderate forces in the Japanese government and alienate a potential ally against the Soviet Union, which he saw as a much greater threat. In response to the Japanese invasion, Hoover and Secretary of State Stimson outlined the Stimson Doctrine, which held that the United States would not recognize territories gained by force.
Thousands of World War I veterans and their families demonstrated and camped out in Washington, DC, during June 1932, calling for immediate payment of bonuses that had been promised by the World War Adjusted Compensation Act in 1924; the terms of the act called for payment of the bonuses in 1945. Although offered money by Congress to return home, some members of the “Bonus Army” remained. Washington police attempted to disperse the demonstrators, but they were outnumbered and unsuccessful. Shots were fired by the police in a futile attempt to attain order, and two protesters were killed while many officers were injured. Hoover sent U.S. Army forces led by General Douglas MacArthur to the protests. MacArthur, believing he was fighting a Communist revolution, chose to clear out the camp with military force. Though Hoover had not ordered MacArthur’s clearing out of the protesters, he endorsed it after the fact. The incident proved embarrassing for the Hoover administration, and destroyed any remaining chance he had of winning re-election.
1932 re-election campaign
By mid-1931 few observers thought that Hoover had much hope of winning a second term in the midst of the ongoing economic crisis. Nonetheless, Hoover faced little opposition for re-nomination at the 1932 Republican National Convention, as Coolidge and other prominent Republicans all passed on the opportunity to challenge Hoover. Franklin D. Roosevelt won the presidential nomination on the fourth ballot of the 1932 Democratic National Convention, defeating the 1928 Democratic nominee, Al Smith. The Democrats attacked Hoover as the cause of the Great Depression, and for being indifferent to the suffering of millions. As Governor of New York, Roosevelt had called on the New York legislature to provide aid for the needy, establishing Roosevelt’s reputation for being more favorable toward government interventionism during the economic crisis. The Democratic Party, including Al Smith and other national leaders, coalesced behind Roosevelt, while progressive Republicans like George Norris and Robert La Follette Jr. deserted Hoover.
Hoover’s detractors wondered why he did not do anything to reapportion congress after the 1920 United States Census which saw an increase in urban and immigrant populations. The 1920 Census was the first and only Decennial Census where the results were not used to reapportion Congress; which ultimately influenced the 1928 Electoral College and impacted the Presidential Election.
Hoover originally planned to make only one or two major speeches, and to leave the rest of the campaigning to proxies, as sitting presidents had traditionally done. However, encouraged by Republican pleas and outraged by Democratic claims, Hoover entered the public fray. In his nine major radio addresses Hoover primarily defended his administration and his philosophy of government, urging voters to hold to the “foundations of experience” and reject the notion that government interventionism could save the country from the Depression. In his campaign trips around the country, Hoover was faced with perhaps the most hostile crowds ever seen by a sitting president. Besides having his train and motorcades pelted with eggs and rotten fruit, he was often heckled while speaking, and on several occasions, the Secret Service halted attempts to kill Hoover by disgruntled citizens, including capturing one man nearing Hoover carrying sticks of dynamite, and another already having removed several spikes from the rails in front of the president’s train.
Hoover’s attempts to vindicate his administration fell on deaf ears, as much of the public blamed his administration for the depression. In the electoral vote, Hoover lost 59–472, carrying six states. Hoover won just 39.7 percent of the popular vote, a reduction of 26 percentage points from his result in the 1928 election. Roosevelt’s performance in the popular vote made him the first Democratic presidential nominee to win the presidency with a majority of the popular vote since the Civil War.
Opposition to New Deal
Hoover departed from Washington in March 1933, bitter at his election loss and continuing unpopularity. As Coolidge, Harding, Wilson, and Taft had all died during the 1920s or early 1930s, Hoover was the sole living ex-president from 1933 to 1953. Hoover and his wife lived in Palo Alto until her death in 1944, at which point Hoover began to live permanently at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York City. During the 1930s, Hoover increasingly self-identified as a conservative. He closely followed national events after leaving public office, becoming a constant critic of Franklin Roosevelt. In response to continued attacks on his character and presidency, Hoover wrote more than two dozen books, including The Challenge to Liberty (1934), which harshly criticized Roosevelt’s New Deal. Hoover described the New Deal’s National Recovery Administration and Agricultural Adjustment Administration as “fascistic”, and he called the 1933 Banking Act a “move to gigantic socialism.”
Only 58 when he left office, Hoover held out hope for another term as president throughout the 1930s. At the 1936 Republican National Convention, Hoover’s speech attacking the New Deal was well received, but the nomination went to Kansas Governor Alf Landon. In the general election, Hoover delivered numerous well-publicized speeches on behalf of Landon, but Landon was defeated by Roosevelt. Though Hoover was eager to oppose Roosevelt at every turn, Senator Arthur Vandenberg and other Republicans urged the still-unpopular Hoover to remain out of the fray during the debate over Roosevelt’s proposed Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937. At the 1940 Republican National Convention, Hoover again hoped for the presidential nomination, but it went to the internationalist Wendell Willkie, who lost to Roosevelt in the general election.
World War II
During a 1938 trip to Europe, Hoover met with Adolf Hitler and stayed at Hermann Göring‘s hunting lodge. He expressed dismay at the persecution of Jews in Germany and believed that Hitler was mad, but did not present a threat to the U.S. Instead, Hoover believed that Roosevelt posed the biggest threat to peace, holding that Roosevelt’s policies provoked Japan and discouraged France and the United Kingdom from reaching an “accommodation” with Germany. After the September 1939 invasion of Poland by Germany, Hoover opposed U.S. involvement in World War II, including the Lend-Lease policy. He rejected Roosevelt’s offers to help coordinate relief in Europe, but, with the help of old friends from the CRB, helped establish the Commission for Polish Relief.
During a radio broadcast on June 29, 1941, one week after the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, Hoover disparaged any “tacit alliance” between the U.S. and the USSR, stating, “if we join the war and Stalin wins, we have aided him to impose more communism on Europe and the world… War alongside Stalin to impose freedom is more than a travesty. It is a tragedy.” Much to his own frustration, Hoover was not called upon to serve after the United States entered World War II due to his differences with Roosevelt and his continuing unpopularity. He did not pursue the presidential nomination at the 1944 Republican National Convention, and, at the request of Republican nominee Thomas E. Dewey, refrained from campaigning during the general election.
Post–World War II
Following World War II, Hoover befriended President Harry S. Truman despite their ideological differences. Because of Hoover’s experience with Germany at the end of World War I, in 1946 Truman selected the former president to tour Germany to ascertain the food needs of the occupied nation. After touring Germany, Hoover produced a number of reports critical of U.S. occupation policy. He stated in one report that “there is the illusion that the New Germany left after the annexations can be reduced to a ‘pastoral state.’ It cannot be done unless we exterminate or move 25,000,000 people out of it.” On Hoover’s initiative, a school meals program in the American and British occupation zones of Germany was begun on April 14, 1947; the program served 3,500,000 children.
In 1947, Truman appointed Hoover to a commission to reorganize the executive departments; the commission elected Hoover as chairman and became known as the Hoover Commission. The commission recommended changes designed to strengthen the president’s ability to manage the federal government. Though Hoover had opposed Roosevelt’s concentration of power in the 1930s, he believed that a stronger presidency was required with the advent of the Atomic Age. During the 1948 presidential election, Hoover supported Republican nominee Thomas Dewey’s unsuccessful campaign against Truman, but he remained on good terms with Truman. Hoover favored the United Nations in principle, but he opposed granting membership to the Soviet Union and other Communist states. He viewed the Soviet Union to be as morally repugnant as Nazi Germany and supported the efforts of Richard Nixon and others to expose Communists in the United States.
Hoover backed conservative leader Robert A. Taft at the 1952 Republican National Convention, but the party’s presidential nomination instead went to Dwight D. Eisenhower, who went on to win the 1952 election. Though Eisenhower appointed Hoover to another presidential commission, Hoover disliked Eisenhower, faulting the latter’s failure to roll back the New Deal. Hoover’s public work helped to rehabilitate his reputation, as did his use of self-deprecating humor; he occasionally remarked that “I am the only person of distinction who’s ever had a depression named after him.” In 1958, Congress passed the Former Presidents Act, offering a $25,000 yearly pension (equivalent to $217,099 in 2018) to each former president. Hoover took the pension even though he did not need the money, possibly to avoid embarrassing Truman, whose precarious financial status played a role in the law’s enactment. In the early 1960s, President John F. Kennedy offered Hoover various positions; Hoover declined the offers but defended Kennedy after the Bay of Pigs invasion and was personally distraught by Kennedy’s assassination in 1963.
Hoover wrote several books during his retirement, including The Ordeal of Woodrow Wilson, in which he strongly defended Wilson’s actions at the Paris Peace Conference. In 1944, he began working on Freedom Betrayed, which he often referred to as his “magnum opus.” In Freedom Betrayed, Hoover strongly critiques Roosevelt’s foreign policy, especially Roosevelt’s decision to recognize the Soviet Union in order to provide aid to that country during World War II. The book was published in 2012 after being edited by historian George H. Nash.
Hoover faced three major illnesses during the last two years of his life, including an August 1962 operation in which a growth on his large intestine was removed. He died on October 20, 1964 in New York City following massive internal bleeding. Though Hoover’s last spoken words are unknown, his last known written words were a get well message to his friend Harry Truman, six days before his death, after he heard that Truman sustained injuries from slipping in a bathroom: “Bathtubs are a menace to ex-presidents for as you may recall a bathtub rose up and fractured my vertebrae when I was in Venezuela on your world famine mission in 1946. My warmest sympathy and best wishes for your recovery.” Two months earlier, he had become only the second U.S. president to reach age 90, joining John Adams. When asked how he felt on reaching the milestone, Hoover replied, “Too old.” (Four subsequent presidents have outlived them both: Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush.) At the time of his death Hoover had been out of office for over 31 years (11,553 days altogether). This was the longest retirement in presidential history until Jimmy Carter broke that record in September 2012.
Hoover was honored with a state funeral in which he lay in state in the United States Capitol rotunda. Then, on October 25, he was buried in West Branch, Iowa, near his presidential library and birthplace on the grounds of the Herbert Hoover National Historic Site. Afterwards, Hoover’s wife, Lou Henry, who had been buried in Palo Alto, California, following her death in 1944, was re-interred beside him.
Hoover was extremely unpopular when he left office after the 1932 election, and his historical reputation would not begin to recover until the 1970s. According to Professor David E. Hamilton, historians have credited Hoover for his genuine belief in voluntarism and cooperation, as well as the innovation of some of his programs. However, Hamilton also notes that Hoover was politically inept and failed to recognize the severity of the Great Depression. Nicholas Lemann writes that Hoover has been remembered “as the man who was too rigidly conservative to react adeptly to the Depression, as the hapless foil to the great Franklin Roosevelt, and as the politician who managed to turn a Republican country into a Democratic one.” Polls of historians and political scientists have generally ranked Hoover in the bottom third of presidents. A 2018 poll of the American Political Science Association‘s Presidents and Executive Politics section ranked Hoover as the 36th best president. A 2017 C-Span poll of historians also ranked Hoover as the 36th best president.
Although Hoover is generally regarded as having had a failed presidency, he has also received praise for his actions as a humanitarian and public official. Biographer Glen Jeansonne writes that Hoover was “one of the most extraordinary Americans of modern times,” adding that Hoover “led a life that was a prototypical Horatio Alger story, except that Horatio Alger stories stop at the pinnacle of success.” Biographer Kenneth Whyte writes that, “the question of where Hoover belongs in the American political tradition remains a loaded one to this day. While he clearly played important roles in the development of both the progressive and conservative traditions, neither side will embrace him for fear of contamination with the other.”
The Herbert Hoover Presidential Library and Museum is located in West Branch, Iowa next to the Herbert Hoover National Historic Site. The library is one of thirteen presidential libraries run by the National Archives and Records Administration. The Hoover–Minthorn House, where Hoover lived from 1885 to 1891, is located in Newberg, Oregon. His Rapidan fishing camp in Virginia, which he donated to the government in 1933, is now a National Historic Landmark within the Shenandoah National Park. The Lou Henry and Herbert Hoover House, built in 1919 in Stanford, California, is now the official residence of the president of Stanford University, and a National Historic Landmark. Also located at Stanford is the Hoover Institution, a think tank and research institution started by Hoover.
Hoover has been memorialized in the names of several things, including the Hoover Dam on the Colorado River and numerous elementary, middle, and high schools across the United States. Two minor planets, 932 Hooveria and 1363 Herberta, are named in his honor. The Polish capital of Warsaw has a square named after Hoover, and the historic townsite of Gwalia, Western Australia contains the Hoover House Bed and Breakfast, where Hoover resided while managing and visiting the mine during the first decade of the twentieth century. A medicine ball game known as Hooverball is named for Hoover; it was invented by White House physician Admiral Joel T. Boone to help Hoover keep fit while serving as president.
- Great Depression in the United States
- List of Presidents of the United States
- Progressive Era
- Roaring Twenties
- Burner 1996, p. 4.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 5–10.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 13–14, 31.
- Burner 1996, p. 10.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 17–18.
- San Antonio Express, April 13, 1931
- Burner 1996, p. 12.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 20–21.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 22–24.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 4–6.
- Burner 1996, p. 16.
- Revsine, David ‘Dave’, “One-sided numbers dominate Saturday’s rivalry games”, ESPN, Go, retrieved November 30, 2006
- Whyte 2017, pp. 35–39.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 6–9.
- Big Games: College Football’s Greatest Rivalries – Page 222
- Whyte 2017, pp. 39–41.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 46–48.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 48–50.
- “Herbert Hoover, the graduate: Have Stanford degree, will travel”. Hoover Institution. June 15, 2011. Retrieved January 24, 2013.
- “What did the President do in Western Australia?”, FAQ, Herbert Hoover Presidential Library and Museum, archived from the original on January 18, 2012, retrieved January 18, 2012
- Whyte 2017, pp. 54–55.
- Whyte 2017, p. 56.
- Nash 1983, p. 283.
- Gwalia Historic Site, AU
- “Hoover’s Gold” (PDF). Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2005. Retrieved June 17, 2010.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 10–13.
- Burner 1996, p. 32.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 70–71, 76.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 72–73.
- Burner 1996, p. 34.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 77–78, 81.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 79–81.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 85–89.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 88–89.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 91–93.
- Whyte 2017, p. 98.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 102–104.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 112–115.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 11–13.
- Nash 1983, p. 392.
- Hoover, Herbert C. (1952). The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover Years of Adventure 1874–1920. London: Hollis & Carter. p. 99
- Nash 1983, p. 569.
- Whyte 2017, p. 115.
- Burner 1996, pp. 24–43.
- Blainey, Geoffrey (1963). The Rush That Never Ended. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. pp. 265–268.
- Hoover, Herbert C. (1952). The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover Years of Adventure 1874–1920. London: Hollis & Carter
- Nash 1983, p. 381.
- Kennan, George (1891). Siberia and the Exile System. London: James R. Osgood, McIlvaine & Co. pp. 165, 286.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 18–20.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 119–120.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 124–125.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 43–44.
- Whyte 2017, p. 109.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 109, 123, 369–370.
- Hamilton, David E. “Herbert Hoover: Life Before the Presidency”. Miller Center. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 90, 96, 103.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 182–183, 207–208, 312.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 132–136.
- “The Humanitarian Years”, The Museum Exhibit Galleries, Herbert Hoover Presidential Library and Museum, archived from the original on January 9, 2011, retrieved February 16, 2011
- Whyte 2017, pp. 137–138.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 140–142.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 143–144.
- Burner 1996, p. 79.
- Whyte 2017, p. 163.
- John Hudson (October 6, 2014). Christmas 1914: The First World War at Home and Abroad. History Press. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-7509-6038-0.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 158–159.
- Burton Jesse Hendrick; Woodrow Wilson (1926). The life and letters of Walter H. Page. Doubleday, Page. p. 313.
- Woodrow Wilson; Arthur Stanley Link (1982). The Papers of Woodrow Wilson. Princeton University Press. p. 369. vol 40 p 369.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 179–181.
- Burner 1996, pp. 96–97.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 178, 187–191.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 41–43.
- Burner 1996, p. 101.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 183–185.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 198–199.
- Burner 1996, pp. 104–109.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 212–213.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 204–206.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 214–215.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 41–43, 57–58.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 215–217.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 216–222.
- Keynes 1919, p. 247.
- Whyte 2017, p. 224.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 43–45.
- “Food as a Weapon.”, Hoover Digest, Hoover Institution
- How the U.S. saved a starving Soviet Russia: PBS film highlights Stanford scholar’s research on the 1921–23 famine“. Stanford University. April 4, 2011
- “Hoover Institution Timeline”. Hoover Institution. Retrieved September 25, 2017.
- Zieger, Robert H. (January 13, 2015). Republicans and Labor: 1919–1929. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 9780813164991 – via Google Books.
- Himmelberg, Robert F. (January 16, 1962). Antitrust and Regulation During World War I and the Republican Era, 1917-1932. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9780815314066 – via Google Books.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 45–50.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 232–234.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 235–236.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 237–238.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 51–52.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 247–248.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 288–292.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 53–63.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 254–257.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 106.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 260–264.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 303–304.
- Ferrell 1998, pp. 32–33.
- Barnouw, Erik (1966), A Tower In Babel; A history of Broadcasting in the United States to 1933, New York: Oxford University Press
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 53–54.
- Whyte 2017, p. 271.
- Peter D. Norton, Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City (MIT Press, 2008), pp. 178–197 ISBN 0-262-14100-0
- Whyte 2017, pp. 257–200.
- Hart 1998.
- Hutchison, Janet (1997), “Building for Babbitt: the State and the Suburban Home Ideal”, Journal of Policy History, 9 (2): 184–210, doi:10.1017/S0898030600005923
- Whyte 2017, pp. 269–271.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 68–71.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 328–329.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 333–335.
- ‘Robert Moton and the Colored Advisory Commission’, PBS.org
- Whyte 2017, pp. 322–323.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 335–338.
- Ferrell 1957, p. 195.
- McCoy 1967, pp. 390–391; Wilson 1975, pp. 122–123.
- Rusnak, Robert J. (Spring 1983). “Andrew W. Mellon: Reluctant Kingmaker”. Presidential Studies Quarterly. 13 (2): 269–278. JSTOR 27547924.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 338–339.
- Mencken, Henry Louis; Nathan, George Jean (1929), The American Mercury, p. 404
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 71–72.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 344–345, 350.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 343–346.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 349–351.
- Garcia 1980, pp. 462–463.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 355, 360.
- Elesha Coffman, ‘The “Religious Issue” in Presidential Politics’, American Catholic Studies, (Winter 2008) 119#4 pp 1–20
- George 1980.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 369–370.
- Slayton, Robert A. (June 2, 2002). Empire Statesman: The Rise and Redemption of Al Smith. New York: Simon and Schuster. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-684-86302-3.
- Finan, Christomer M. (June 2, 2002). Alfred E. Smith: The Happy Warrior. Hill and Wang. ISBN 0-8090-3033-0.
- Biography, Miller center
- Fausold 1985, pp. 65–66.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 84–85.
- Fausold 1985, p. 34.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 81-82.
- See generally Nancy Beck Young, Lou Henry Hoover: Activist First Lady (University Press of Kansas, 2005)
- James L. Roark; Michael P. Johnson; Patricia Cline Cohen; Sarah Stage; Susan M. Hartmann (2012). The American Promise, Volume C: A History of the United States: Since 1890. Bedford/St. Martin’s. p. 772. ISBN 9780312569440.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 80–81.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 65–68.
- Kennedy 1999, pp. 35–36.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 68–71.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 72–74.
- Kaufman 2012, p. 502.
- Houck, pp. 155–156.
- Carcasson, pp. 350–351.
- Leuchtenburg 2009b.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 74–75.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 104105.
- Kennedy 1999, pp. 53–55.
- Harris Gaylord Warren, Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression (New York: Oxford University Press, 1959), p. 175.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 147–149.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 93–97.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 399–402, 414.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 414–415.
- Kumiko Koyama, “The Passage of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act: Why Did the President Sign the Bill?” Journal of Policy History (2009) 21#2 pp. 163–86
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 91–92.
- Kennedy 1999, pp. 58–59.
- Kennedy 1999, pp. 65–66.
- Kennedy 1999, pp. 77–78.
- Eichengreen & Temin 2000, pp. 196-197.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 143–144.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 441–444, 449.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 450–452.
- Herring, pp. 485–486.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 140–141.
- Carcasson 1998, pp. 351–352.
- Cabanes, Bruno (2014). The Great War and the Origins of Humanitarianism, 1918-1924. Cambridge University Press. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-107-02062-7.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 457–459.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 162–166.
- Olson 1972, pp. 508–511.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 153–154.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 162–163.
- Rappleye 2016, pp. 309.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 483–484.
- Rappleye 2016, p. 303.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 158–159.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 472, 488–489.
- Ippolito, Dennis S. (2012). Deficits, Debt, and the New Politics of Tax Policy. Cambridge University Press. p. 35. ISBN 9781139851572.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 159–161.
- Lisio, Donald J. Hoover, Blacks, & Lily-Whites: A Study of Southern Strategies, University of North Carolina Press, 1985 (excerpt)
- Garcia 1980, pp. 471–474.
- Garcia 1980, pp. 462–464.
- Garcia 1980, pp. 464–465.
- Garcia 1980, pp. 465–467.
- Garcia 1980, pp. 476–477.
- Rappleye 2016, p. 247.
- Hoffman 1973, pp. 206–207.
- Hoffman 1973, pp. 208, 217–218.
- Johnson 2005, pp. 4–5.
- Johnson 2005, p. 6.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 372–373.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, p. 85.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 433–435.
- Kyvig, David E. (1979). Repealing National Prohibition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. p. 49.
- Huckabee, David C. (September 30, 1997). “Ratification of Amendments to the U.S. Constitution” (PDF). Congressional Research Service reports. Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, p. 117.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 120–121.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 183–186.
- Fausold 1985, p. 58.
- Herring, pp. 479–480.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 175–176.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 117–119.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 122–123.
- Richard N. Current, “The Stimson Doctrine and the Hoover Doctrine,” American Historical Review Vol. 59, No. 3 (Apr. 1954), pp. 513–42 in JSTOR
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 136–138.
- Dickson, Paul; Allen, Thomas B. (February 2003). “Marching on History”. Smithsonian. Retrieved February 7, 2017.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 193–194.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 194–195.
- Carcasson 1998, pp. 353.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 138–140.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 211–212.
- Carcasson 1998, pp. 359.
- Gibbs, Nancy (November 10, 2008). “When New President Meets Old, It’s Not Always Pretty”. Time.
- Carcasson 1998, pp. 361–362.
- Fausold 1985, pp. 212–213.
- Leuchtenberg 2009, pp. 142.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 147–149.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 155–156.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 555–557.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 147–151.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 151–153.
- Brant Short, “The Rhetoric of the Post-Presidency: Herbert Hoover’s Campaign against the New Deal, 1934–1936”. Presidential Studies Quarterly 21#2 (1991): 333–350. in JSTOR
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 147–154.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 558–559.
- Kosner, Edward (October 28, 2017). “A Wonder Boy on the Wrong Side of History”. The Wall Street Journal. New York City: Dow Jones & Company.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 152–154.
- Whyte 2017, p. 565.
- Jeansonne 2016, pp. 328–329.
- Robinson, Edgar Eugene (1973). “Hoover, Herbert Clark”. Encyclopædia Britannica. 11. Chicago, Illinois: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. pp. 676–77.
- Whyte 2017, p. 572.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 157–158.
- Beschloss, Michael R. (2002). The Conquerors: Roosevelt, Truman and the Destruction of Hitler’s Germany, 1941–1945. New York City: Simon & Schuster. p. 277. ISBN 978-0743244541.
- UN Chronicle (March 18, 1947). “The Marshall Plan at 60: The General’s Successful War on Poverty”. The United Nations. Archived from the original on April 14, 2008. Retrieved June 17, 2010.
- (2014). An Illustrated History of Health and Fitness, from Pre-History to our Post-Modern World. New York City: Axel Springer SE. p. 782.
- “National Press Club Luncheon Speakers, Herbert Hoover, March 10, 1954”. Library of Congress. Retrieved October 20, 2016.
- Leuchtenburg 2009, pp. 158–159.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 587–588.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 592–594.
- Whyte 2017, p. 595.
- Whyte 2017, p. 592.
- Smith, Stephanie (March 18, 2008). “Former Presidents: Federal Pension and Retirement Benefits” (PDF). Congressional Research Service. U.S. Senate. Retrieved November 18, 2008.
- Martin, Joseph William (1960). My First Fifty Years in Politics as Told to Robert J. Donovan. McGraw-Hill. p. 249.
- Whyte 2017, p. 601.
- Whyte 2017, pp. 571, 604–605.
- Whyte 2017, p. 606.
- Yerxa, Donald A (September 2012), “Freedom Betrayed: An interview with George H. Nash about Herbert Hoover’s Magnum Opus”, Historically Speaking, XIII (4)
- Whyte 2017, pp. 606–607.
- “Hoover Marks 90th Year Today; Predicts New Gains for Nation Because of Its Freedoms”. August 10, 1964. Retrieved March 25, 2019 – via New York Times digital archives.
- Phillips, McCandlish (October 21, 1964). “Herbert Hoover Is Dead; Ex-President, 90, Served Country in Varied Fields”. The Learning Network: The New York Times on the web. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
- Mancini, Mark. “Harry Truman and Herbert Hoover: An Unlikely Friendship”. Mentalfloss.org. Mentalfloss. Retrieved April 6, 2019.
- Dillon, John (September 9, 2012). “The Record-Setting Ex-Presidency of Jimmy Carter”. The Atlantic. Boston, Massachusetts: Emerson Collective. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
- “Lying in State or in Honor”. Washington, D.C.: Architect of the Capitol. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
- “Gravesite”. nps.gov. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
- Hamilton, David E. (October 4, 2016). “HERBERT HOOVER: IMPACT AND LEGACY”. Miller Center. Retrieved December 5, 2017.
- Lemann, Nicholas (October 23, 2017). “Hating on Herbert Hoover”. The New Yorker. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
- Rottinghaus, Brandon; Vaughn, Justin S. (February 19, 2018). “How Does Trump Stack Up Against the Best — and Worst — Presidents?”. The New York Times.
- “Presidential Historians Survey 2017”. C-Span. Retrieved May 14, 2018.
- Jeansonne 2016, pp. 1–2.
- Whyte 2017, p. 610.
- Schmadel, Lutz D. (2007). “(932) Hooveria”. Dictionary of Minor Planet Names – (932) Hooveria. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 83. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29925-7_933. ISBN 978-3-540-00238-3.
- Schmadel, Lutz D. (2007). “(1363) Herberta”. Dictionary of Minor Planet Names – (1363) Herberta. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 110. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29925-7_1364. ISBN 978-3-540-00238-3.
- “An American Friendship: Herbert Hoover and Poland”, Library & Archives, Stanford University: Hoover Institution, June 1 – August 1, 2005, archived from the original on January 1, 2011, retrieved February 17, 2011
- Gwalia House Archived April 9, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Gwalia.org.au. Retrieved on July 14, 2013.
- “History of Hoover-Ball”. Herbert Hoover Presidential Library and Museum. Archived from the original on October 25, 2012. Retrieved June 30, 2014.
- Burner, David (1996) . Herbert Hoover: The Public Life. Easton Press. Originally published as Burner, David (1979). Herbert Hoover: The Public Life. Knopf Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-394-46134-2.
- Carcasson, Martin (Spring 1998). “Herbert Hoover and the Presidential Campaign of 1932: The Failure of Apologia”. Presidential Studies Quarterly. 28 (2): 349–365. JSTOR 27551864.
- Eichengreen, Barry; Temin, Peter (2000). “The Gold Standard and the Great Depression” (PDF). Contemporary European History. 9 (2): 183–207. doi:10.1017/S0960777300002010. JSTOR 20081742.
- Fausold, Martin L. (1985). The Presidency of Herbert C. Hoover. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-0259-9.
- Ferrell, Robert H. (1998). The Presidency of Calvin Coolidge. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-0892-8.
- Ferrell, Robert H. (1957). American Diplomacy in the Great Depression: Hoover–Stimson Foreign Policy, 1929–1933. Yale University Press.
- Garcia, George F. (January 1, 1980). “Black Disaffection From the Republican Party During the Presidency of Herbert Hoover, 1928–1932”. The Annals of Iowa. 45 (6): 462–477. doi:10.17077/0003-4827.8734. ISSN 0003-4827.
- Hart, David M. (1998), “Herbert Hoover’s Last Laugh: the Enduring Significance of the ‘Associative State’ in the United States”, Journal of Policy History, 10 (4): 419–444, doi:10.1017/S0898030600007156
- Herring, George C. (2008). From Colony to Superpower; U.S. Foreign Relations Since 1776. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507822-0.
- Hoffman, Abraham (May 1973). “Stimulus to Repatriation: The 1931 Federal Deportation Drive and the Los Angeles Mexican Community”. Pacific Historical Review. 42 (2): 205–219. doi:10.2307/3638467. JSTOR 3638467.
- Johnson, Kevin (Fall 2005). “The Forgotten Repatriation of Persons of Mexican Ancestry and Lessons for the War on Terror”. 26 (1). Pace Law Review: 1–26. Cite journal requires
- Jeansonne, Glen (2016). Herbert Hoover: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 9781101991008.
- Kaufman, Bruce E. (2012). “Wage Theory, New Deal Labor Policy, and the Great Depression: Were Government and Unions to Blame?”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 65 (3): 501–532. doi:10.1177/001979391206500302. hdl:10072/48703. JSTOR 24368882.
- Leuchtenburg, William E. (2009). Herbert Hoover. Times Books (Henry Holt and Company). ISBN 978-0-8050-6958-7.
- Leuchtenburg, William E. (Summer 2009). “The Wrong Man at the Wrong Time”. American Heritage. 59 (2).
- McCoy, Donald R. (1967). Calvin Coolidge: The Quiet President. Macmillan. ISBN 978-1468017779.
- Nash, George H. (1983). The Life of Herbert Hoover: The Engineer 1874–1914. W W Norton. ISBN 978-0393016345. Book 1 in The Life of Herbert Hoover Series.
- O’Brien, Patrick G.; Rosen, Philip T. (1981). “Hoover and the Historians: the Resurrection of a President”. The Annals of Iowa. 46 (2): 83–99. doi:10.17077/0003-4827.8816.
- Olson, James S. (October 1972). “Gifford Pinchot and the Politics of Hunger, 1932–1933”. Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography. 96 (4): 508–520. JSTOR 20090681.
- Rappleye (2016). Herbert Hoover in the White House: The Ordeal of the Presidency. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4516-4869-0.
- Whyte, Kenneth (2017). Hoover: An Extraordinary Life in Extraordinary Times. Knopf. ISBN 978-0307597960.
- Wilson, Joan Hoff (1975). Herbert Hoover, Forgotten Progressive. Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-316-94416-8.
- Best, Gary Dean. The Politics of American Individualism: Herbert Hoover in Transition, 1918–1921 (1975)
- Best, Gary Dean. The Life of Herbert Hoover: Keeper of the Torch, 1933–1964. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
- Clements, Kendrick A. The Life of Herbert Hoover: Imperfect Visionary, 1918–1928 (2010).
- Edwards, Barry C. “Putting Hoover on the Map: Was the 31st President a Progressive?” Congress & the Presidency 41#1 (2014) pp 49–83 online
- Hatfield, Mark. ed. Herbert Hoover Reassessed (2002)
- Hawley, Ellis (1989), Herbert Hoover and the Historians.
- Jeansonne, Glen. The Life of Herbert Hoover: Fighting Quaker, 1928–1933. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
- Lloyd, Craig. Aggressive Introvert: A Study of Herbert Hoover and Public Relations Management, 1912–1932 (1973).
- Nash, George H. The Life of Herbert Hoover: The Engineer 1874–1914 (1983); in-depth scholarly study
- ———— (1988), The Humanitarian, 1914–1917, The Life of Herbert Hoover, 2.
- ———— (1996), Master of Emergencies, 1917–1918, The Life of Herbert Hoover, 3.
- Nash, Lee, ed. Understanding Herbert Hoover: Ten Perspectives (1987); essays by scholars
- Smith, Richard Norton. An Uncommon Man: The Triumph of Herbert Hoover, (1987), biography concentrating on post 1932.
- Walch, Timothy. ed. Uncommon Americans: The Lives and Legacies of Herbert and Lou Henry Hoover Praeger, 2003.
- West, Hal Elliott. Hoover, The Fishing President: Portrait of the Man and his Life Outdoors (2005).
- Claus Bernet (2009). “Hoover, Herbert”. In Bautz, Traugott (ed.). Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (BBKL) (in German). 30. Nordhausen: Bautz. cols. 644–653. ISBN 978-3-88309-478-6.
- Arnold, Peri E. “The ‘Great Engineer’ as Administrator: Herbert Hoover and Modern Bureaucracy.” Review of Politics 42.3 (1980): 329-348. online
- Barber, William J. From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists, and American Economic Policy, 1921–1933. (1985)
- Brandes, Joseph. Herbert Hoover and Economic Diplomacy: Department of Commerce Policy, 1921-1928. (U of Pittsburgh Press, 1970).
- Britten, Thomas A. “Hoover and the Indians: the Case for Continuity in Federal Indian Policy, 1900–1933” Historian 1999 61(3): 518–538. ISSN 0018-2370
- Clements, Kendrick A. Hoover, Conservation, and Consumerism: Engineering the Good Life. University Press of Kansas, 2000
- Dodge, Mark M., ed. Herbert Hoover and the Historians. (1989)
- Fausold Martin L. and George Mazuzan, eds. The Hoover Presidency: A Reappraisal (1974)
- Goodman, Mark, and Mark Gring. “The Radio Act of 1927: progressive ideology, epistemology, and praxis.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 3.3 (2000): 397-418. online
- Hawley, Ellis. “Herbert Hoover, the Commerce Secretariat, and the Vision of an ‘Associative State’, 1921–1928”. Journal of American History, (June 1974) 61#1 : 116–140 online
- Houck, Davis W. “Rhetoric as Currency: Herbert Hoover and the 1929 Stock Market Crash” Rhetoric & Public Affairs (2000) 3#2 ): 155–181. ISSN 1094-8392
- Jansky Jr, C. M. “The contribution of Herbert Hoover to broadcasting.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 1.3 (1957): 241-249.
- Lee, David D. “Herbert Hoover and the Development of Commercial Aviation, 1921–1926.” Business History Review 58.1 (1984): 78-102.
- Lichtman, Allan J. Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928 (1979)
- Lisio, Donald J. The President and Protest: Hoover, MacArthur, and the Bonus Riot, 2d ed. (1994)
- Lisio, Donald J. Hoover, Blacks, and Lily-whites: A Study of Southern Strategies (1985)
- Parafianowicz,Halina. ‘Herbert C. Hoover and Poland: 1919–1933. Between Myth and Reality’
- Polsky, Andrew J., and Olesya Tkacheva. “Legacies Versus Politics: Herbert Hoover, Partisan Conflict, and the Symbolic Appeal of Associationalism in the 1920s.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 16.2 (2002): 207-235. online
- Short, Brant. “The Rhetoric of the Post-Presidency: Herbert Hoover’s Campaign against the New Deal, 1934-1936” Presidential Studies Quarterly (1991) 21#2 pp. 333–350 online
- Sibley, Katherine A.S., ed. A Companion to Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover (2014); 616pp; essays by scholars stressing historiography
- Wueschner, Silvano A. Charting Twentieth-Century Monetary Policy: Herbert Hoover and Benjamin Strong, 1917–1927. Greenwood, 1999
- Myers, William Starr; Walter H. Newton, eds. The Hoover Administration; a documented narrative. 1936.
- Hawley, Ellis, ed. Herbert Hoover: Containing the Public Messages, Speeches, and Statements of the President, 4 vols. (1974–1977)
- Hoover, Herbert Clark (1934), The Challenge to Liberty.
- ———————— (1938), Addresses Upon The American Road, 1933–1938.
- ———————— (1941), Addresses Upon The American Road, 1940–41.
- ————————; and Gibson, Hugh (1942), The Problems of Lasting Peace.
- ———————— (1949), Addresses Upon The American Road, 1945–48.
- ———————— (1952a), Years of adventure, 1874–1920 (PDF), Memoirs, 1, New York, archived from the original (PDF) on December 17, 2008.
- ———————— (1952b), The Cabinet and the Presidency, 1920–1933 (PDF), Memoirs, 2, New York, archived from the original (PDF) on December 17, 2008.
- ———————— (1952c), The Great Depression, 1929–1941 (PDF), Memoirs, 3, New York, archived from the original (PDF) on December 17, 2008.
- Miller, Dwight M.; Walch, Timothy, eds. (1998), Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Documentary History, Contributions in American History, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, ISBN 978-0-313-30608-2
- Hoover, Herbert Clark (2011), Nash, George H. (ed.), Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover’s Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, ISBN 978-0-8179-1234-5.
- Hoover, Herbert Clark (2013), Nash, George H. (ed.), The Crusade Years, 1933–1955: Herbert Hoover’s Lost Memoir of the New Deal Era and Its Aftermath, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, ISBN 978-0-8179-1674-9.
- Works by Herbert Hoover at Project Gutenberg
- Appearances on C-SPAN
- White House biography
- Herbert Hoover Presidential Library and Museum
- Herbert Hoover National Historic Site, National Park Service
- “Herbert Hoover collected news and commentary”. The New York Times.
- Herbert Hoover at Curlie
- Herbert Hoover on IMDb
- Newspaper clippings about Herbert Hoover in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW