Opothleyahola

Add links

The 1852 Whig National Convention was a presidential nominating convention held from June 16 to June 21, in Baltimore, Maryland. It nominated the Whig Party's candidates for president and vice president in the 1852 election. The convention selected General-in-Chief Winfield Scott (commanding the United States Army and led in the recent war with Mexico) for president and U.S. secretary of the navy William A. Graham for vice president.

In the aftermath of the Mexican–American War (1846–1848) and the Compromise of 1850, the Whig Party was torn over the issue of slavery. President Millard Fillmore, who had succeeded to the presidency in July 1850 after the death of Zachary Taylor, had the strong backing of Southern Whigs. However, his enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 had alienated many Northern Whigs, who supported either Scott or secretary of state Daniel Webster. Scott and Fillmore essentially tied on the first presidential ballot, while a smaller fraction of the vote went to Webster. There was little delegate movement over the next 46 ballots, but Scott gained momentum on the 48th ballot and clinched the nomination on the 53rd ballot.

Graham, Edward Bates of Missouri, and James Pearce of Maryland all won significant support on the first vice presidential ballot, but Graham clinched the nomination on the second ballot. In the general election, Scott and Graham were defeated by the Democratic candidates, Franklin Pierce and William R. King, who took office the following March 1853. This 1852 convention was the last Whig Party presidential convention to be held independent of other parties, as the 1856 Whig National Convention was held by a rump faction of Whigs and nominated the ticket previously selected by the competing 1856 American National Convention.

Schedule

The congressional Whig caucus, led by Senator Willie P. Mangum, a supporter of Scott, met on April 9, 1852, to decide the date and location for the 1852 convention.[1] The party chose to hold the convention in Baltimore, Maryland, at the Maryland Institute Hall, from June 16 to 21. The convention was temporarily chaired by George C. Evans and permanently chaired by John G. Chapman.[2]

Pre-convention

In late 1851 and early 1852, state conventions began to meet to select delegates to the national convention. The party was split between those who felt that Fillmore could not win the election and those who favored the president's nomination. Northern Whigs favored Scott while Southern Whigs tended to prefer Fillmore.

The party was also torn on the issue of slavery. Most in the party wanted to prevent slavery from becoming the dominating issue in the election. However, the Whigs were split on the issue of the Compromise of 1850, proposed and designed by Whig senator Henry Clay of Kentucky. President Zachary Taylor, a Southern Whig, had tried to avoid the issue altogether by proposing that California and New Mexico be admitted as free states immediately. After Taylor's death in July 1850, Fillmore, a moderate Whig, had supported Clay's compromise and was instrumental as president in its passage. Northern Whigs, led by William Henry Seward of New York, (a former governor and senator), adamantly opposed the compromise because it did not apply the Wilmot Proviso (which banned slavery in any federal territory acquired from Mexico after the Mexican–American War) to the western territories.

Northern Whigs launched an effort to associate Scott with the Free Soil wing of the party. Scott did not agree with the Free Soilers, who opposed the expansion of slavery into the western territories. Just days before the convention was scheduled to begin, Southern Whigs warned that they would not support Scott unless he pledged to disavow the Free Soilers and to exclude them from his administration if he was elected.

Encouraged by Fillmore's professed lack of desire to pursue the Whig nomination, Webster launched another campaign for the presidency in 1851.[3] Fillmore was sympathetic to the ambitions of his secretary of state, but he was unwilling to completely rule out accepting the party's 1852 nomination, as he feared doing so would allow Seward to gain control of the party through Scott.[4] Scott had supported the Compromise of 1850, but his association with Seward made him unacceptable to Southern Whigs.[4] As Southerners retained a lingering distrust of Webster, they threw their backing behind Fillmore.[5] Thus, Scott emerged as the preferred candidate of most Northern Whigs, Fillmore became the main candidate of Southern Whigs, and Webster was only able to win backing from a handful of delegates, most of whom were from New England.[6]

On the eve of the convention, The New York Times estimated that Fillmore would have the support of 133 delegates, Scott 120 and Webster 40.

Two weeks before the Whig convention was set to begin, the Democrats nominated Franklin Pierce, a northerner from New Hampshire. Supporters of Webster in the North decided that Scott, not Fillmore, could defeat Pierce in the general election, and several switched their support.

The convention

The convention met from June 17 to June 20.

Day 1

Delegates to the fourth Whig Party National Convention assembled also in the same Maryland Institute auditorium, above "Centre Market" at Market Place/South Frederick and East Baltimore Streets, alongside the Jones Falls stream in eastern downtown Baltimore, Maryland. Although each state was granted one delegate for each of their electoral votes, several sent more than their allotted number.

The convention convened on June 17, 15 minutes before the scheduled time. Delegates quickly selected former senator George Evans of Maine as temporary chairman. Because a large number of delegates had not yet arrived, many on the floor objected to the selection. The delegates also appointed the Whig Party's National Committee, as well as a Committee on Credentials and a Committee on Permanent Organization, before adjourning.

An evening session was held later in the day. The Credentials Committee submitted a report which was adopted and the Committee on Permanent Organization was assembled.[7]

Day 2

The second day began with the organization of the convention. Several states had sent delegations that far outnumbered their allowed size. Virginia was allotted 15 votes and sent 45 delegates. Delegates voted to restrict states to one delegate for each of its electoral votes. The convention also adopted the party's platform. Southern delegates submitted a platform, but it was rejected in favor of a relatively weak one which caused little controversy and was easily passed by a vote of 227 to 66.[8]

Presidential nomination

Presidential candidates

The divided convention began the process of nominating a candidate. Fillmore led on the first ballot, receiving 133 votes. Scott placed a close second with 131 votes. Webster received 29 votes. Five more ballots were held with little change in the vote before the convention adjourned for the weekend.

Although both Webster and Fillmore were willing to withdraw in favor of the other, their respective delegates at the convention were unable to unite around either candidate during the weekend adjournment.[9]

The delegates resumed voting on Monday. On the 8th ballot, Scott took the lead with 133 votes to 131 for Fillmore, but neither received the necessary majority for nomination. The convention was deadlocked, and a number of delegates unsuccessfully moved to allow a nomination with a plurality, rather than a majority, of votes. After the 46th ballot, with Scott ahead by seven votes (but still without a majority), the delegates voted to adjourn for the night. On the first ballot of the final day of the convention, the 47th overall, Scott still had not received the majority of votes necessary for nomination. Several more votes were taken. Fillmore lost votes on each successive ballot.[citation needed] On the 52nd ballot, Scott received exactly half of the vote. Scott was finally nominated on the next ballot, obtaining a majority when several delegates from New England and Virginia switched their support.

Presidential Ballot[2][10]: Apdx C 
Ballot 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th 19th 20th 21st 22nd 23rd 24th 25th 26th 27th
Scott 131 133 133 134 130 131 131 133 133 135 134 134 134 133 133 135 132 132 132 132 133 132 132 133 133 134 135
Fillmore 133 131 131 130 133 133 133 131 131 130 131 130 130 130 130 129 131 131 131 131 131 130 130 129 128 128 128
Webster 29 29 29 29 30 29 28 28 29 28 28 28 28 29 29 28 29 28 29 29 28 30 30 30 31 30 29
Crittenden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Choate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Blank 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Presidential Ballot[2][10]
Ballot 28th 29th 30th 31st 32nd 33rd 34th 35th 36th 37th 38th 39th 40th 41st 42nd 43rd 44th 45th 46th 47th 48th 49th 50th 51st 52nd 53rd
Scott 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 133 136 136 134 134 132 134 134 133 133 134 135 139 139 142 142 148 159
Fillmore 128 128 128 128 128 128 126 128 128 127 127 128 128 128 128 128 129 127 127 127 125 122 123 121 118 112
Webster 30 30 29 30 30 29 28 28 29 28 29 30 29 32 30 30 30 32 31 30 27 30 27 28 25 21
Crittenden 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Choate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Blank 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 3

Vice presidential nomination

Observers at the convention noted that "there seemed to be no anxiety to get to the business of selecting the vice-presidential candidate, and when the nominations began, no candidates seemed to want them."[10]: 50  While various candidates were informally approached, each refused consideration in turn. Former representative Edward Bates and navy secretary William Alexander Graham were the two main candidates for the nomination. Bates led on the first ballot at the convention[11] and even had an editorial endorsement from a fellow Missourian who was just starting his career, Mark Twain.[12] But Bates' known Free-Soil sentiments were used against him[13] and Graham was selected on the second ballot.[14] Graham accepted the nomination and he was accepted as the party's candidate by Chapman, the convention chairman.[2][10]: 50 

Convention vice presidential vote
Ballots 1 2
William Alexander Graham 69 223
Edward Bates 97 62
James Pearce 42 4
John W. Crockett 19 0
Edward Stanly 14 0
John J. Crittenden 10 0
Willie P. Mangum 10 4
James L. Petigru 8 1
John Bell 5 0
James C. Jones 5 0
Thomas Brown 3 0
Albert G. Williams 3 0
Henry W. Hilliard 2 0
Thomas Pratt 2 0
Alexander Stuart 2 0
D. B. Richardson 1 0
George E. Badger 1 0
William Larimer Jr. 1 0
Not Voting 2 2

See also

References

  1. ^ "The Whig Caucus". The New York Times. 13 April 1852. p. 2. ProQuest 95788314. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  2. ^ a b c d Havel, James T. (1996). U.S. Presidential Elections and the Candidates: A Biographical and Historical Guide. Vol. 2: The Elections, 1789–1992. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 27. ISBN 0-02-864623-1.
  3. ^ Remini 1997, pp. 724–725.
  4. ^ a b Smith 1988, pp. 239–244.
  5. ^ Holt 1999, pp. 681–682.
  6. ^ Remini 1997, pp. 735–736.
  7. ^ "Latest Intelligence: By Telegraph to the New-York Daily Times". The New York Times. 17 June 1852. p. 1. ProQuest 95795817. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  8. ^ "LATEST INTELLIGENCE: By Telegraph to the New-York Daily Times. WHIG NATIONAL CONVENTION. COMMITTEE ON PLATFORM. THE CONTESTED SEATS. A CLOSE TEST VOTE. SECOND DAY". The New York Times. 18 June 1852. p. 1. ProQuest 95788899. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  9. ^ Remini 1997, pp. 736–739.
  10. ^ a b c d Bain, Richard C.; Parris, Judith H. (1973). Convention Decisions and Voting Records. Studies in Presidential Selection (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution. ISBN 0-8157-0768-1.
  11. ^ "PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES.; Hon. Edward Bates' of Missouri". The New York Times. 1860. Retrieved 5 October 2022.
  12. ^ The Life of Mark Twain: The Early Years, 1835-1871 – Google Books. University of Missouri Press. 2018. Retrieved 5 October 2022.
  13. ^ "PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES.; Hon. Edward Bates' of Missouri". The New York Times. 1860. Retrieved 5 October 2022.
  14. ^ A Political Text Book for 1860 – Google Books. Tribune association. 1860. Retrieved 5 October 2022.

Further reading

Primary sources

  • Chester, Edward W A guide to political platforms (1977) online
  • Porter, Kirk H. and Donald Bruce Johnson, eds. National party platforms, 1840-1964 (1965) online 1840-1956