In international relations and treaties, the principle of reciprocity states that favors, benefits, or penalties that are granted by one state to the citizens or legal entities of another, should be returned in kind.
For example, reciprocity has been used in the reduction of tariffs, the grant of copyrights to foreign authors, the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, and the relaxation of travel restrictions and visa requirements.
The principle of reciprocity also governs agreements on extradition.
Specific and diffuse reciprocity
Several theorists have drawn a distinction between specific forms of reciprocity and "diffuse reciprocity" (Keohane 1986). While specific reciprocity is exemplified by international trade negotiations, as suggested above, diffuse reciprocity points to a wider institutionalisation of trust. Through consistent cooperation in an international society, states are seen as building generally accepted standards of behaviour. These general standards exert their own normative pressure on state action, contributing to the development of long-term obligations between states which stress cooperation. Thus in a system of diffuse reciprocity, states need not seek the immediate benefit guaranteed by specific reciprocity, but can act in the confidence that their cooperative actions will be repaid in the long run.
Reciprocity (International Relations)
Reciprocity being the foundation for many bonds of trust between people can be applied in various ways and within various topics.[1] When thinking of reciprocity in relation to international relations, it is clear to see that exchanges play a big role. An example of international relations reciprocity would be trade agreements. Trade agreements make it easier for countries to trade with one another as even big and small countries can end up trading with one another, leading to it benefitting both countries. There is also room for negotiation with the trades being made, as the small counties, usually being at the disadvantage, can now have that power over the bigger countries that can offer more.[2] Security alliances can also be seen as an example of reciprocity within international relations as both countries are in agreement to help one another in a time of military need. NATO is one of those organizations where countries come together to come up with different policies that help the countries in it, with one of those being a type of security agreement where they will aid one another in a time of military conflict.[3] Again, reciprocity can be used within many topics as gift giving is universal within all.
See also
- Comity
- Admission on motion, a specialized form of reciprocity concerning admission to the bar of certain U.S. states
References
- ^ Molm, Linda D. (2010). "The Structure of Reciprocity". Social Psychology Quarterly. 73 (2): 119–131. doi:10.1177/0190272510369079. ISSN 0190-2725.
- ^ Park, Jee-Hyeong (2000-04-01). "International trade agreements between countries of asymmetric size". Journal of International Economics. 50 (2): 473–495. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00006-9. ISSN 0022-1996.
- ^ Olson, Peter M. (2015). "Agreement Between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan on the Status of NATO Forces and NATO Personnel Conducting MutuallyAgreed NATO-led Activities in Afghanistan & Security and Defense Cooperation Agreement Between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan". International Legal Materials. 54 (2): 272–305. doi:10.5305/intelegamate.54.2.0272. ISSN 0020-7829.
- Keohane, Robert O. (1986), “Reciprocity in international relations”, in International Organization, Vol. 40, No.1.
Further reading
- Ankerl, Guy (2000). Global communication without universal civilization. INU societal research. Vol. 1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations : Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western. Geneva: INU Press. ISBN 2-88155-004-5.`
| Authority control databases: National |
|---|
