Battles of Cabin Creek

Page contents not supported in other languages.

Article split

Should this article be split into two separate articles about each successive battle? DaltonCastle (talk) 23:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For example, the Battle of Bull Run, is split into First Battle of Bull Run, and Second Battle of Bull Run. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DaltonCastle, I believe so-- I've tagged for a proposed split-- I would Support such a proposal Eddie891 Talk Work 13:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support. It's two separate incidents. Hog Farm Bacon 13:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose. While it is two separate incidents, both are fairly minor. It is really only the weight of both that make this site worthy of preservation, and preservation is what much of the article is devoted to. 14:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Support. The engagements are minor in scale but they occurred over a year apart under very different circumstances. If it is true the article tends towards preserving the site, perhaps it would better if we should have three articles (not counting orders of battle): First..., Second..., and Cabin Creek battlefield. BusterD (talk) 15:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Cabin Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have boldly split this article up per the stale discussion above

I have linked each new article to the page history of this article. This page will now serve all three new articles as attribution for all edits prior to the splitting. BusterD (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]