Battle of Honey Springs

Page contents not supported in other languages.

Stub removed

Okay, I put in a basic outline of the battle, which should eliminate the stub rating, its not very good (being my first article) and I haven't had time to put in a lot of citations for this stuff, but I think its alright for now, and this battle certainly deserves a proper article. I also added the approximate troop strengths for each side, although the Confederate numbers are disputed, 6000 is usually the accepted number amongst historians.

Changes to Battle of Honey Springs.

Added further detail to emphasize the presence of native american & black units on the Federal side and an amplified article with bibliography for the interested student. The reference link is to a much longer article, a reproduction of an eyewitness engraving and a bibliography to the article (and a game referenced elsewhere on the site.

The guidelines suggest somebody else should review the linked article to verify that it is appropriate. So I'd appreciate it if somebody would do that. Thx. --LPDuff 22:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Article reclassification

This article now meets the requirements for Class C. I have made this change for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 05:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Battle of Honey Springs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]