After a lengthy discussion, with the orginal page editor in charge and the 3O editor called in, and after modifying my initial proposed addition to all their suggestions to the best of my abilities, they are still refusing to post my modification which, at least in its very latest version Talk:LiveJasmin#Latest_Proposed_Controversy_Section should be compliant with WP requirements. If it is not, can someone help me make it compliant? Initial comments about my initial attempt to edit the page were posted by the page's editor in charge on my Talk page User_talk:Alexfotios. Thank you! Alexfotios (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Criterion #4: Nomination from a major party only. Third-party candidates shouldn't be listed.
Criterion #5: If the candidate holds political beliefs that are non-fringe, mainstream, and polls above a certain percentage. (Whether 1%, 5%, 10%, and 15%.)
Criterion #6: Having ballot access in states that comprise 270 electoral votesand meets criteria #1a, #1b, or #1c.
Criterion #7: Another criterion not listed or a requirement that they fulfill multiple criteria of the above. (Explain how and why.)
The results of this RFC should not be interpreted as WP: PRECEDENT outside of this article. KlayCax (talk) 06:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Should elections include equal-ranked and truncated ballots when calculating vote shares? For example, should ballots marked A = B > C be included in calculating the vote share for A against B?
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.