Battle of Chustenahlah

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Florida Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Miami High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Miami River (Florida) was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 21, 2007 Good article nominee Listed October 4, 2008 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

a map would a nice addition. – ishwar  (speak) 19:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

I've put this article on hold for the following reasons: 1) The lead (first two paragraphs) is slightly disorganized; the main ideas should be more clearly stated in the beginning, followed by slightly more specific information. 2) A bibliography, in addition to inline citations, would improve the article. It is not hard; simply find which inline citation is applicable to the entire article (or most of it), and add that to the bibliography. 3) The rationale for Image:MiamiRiverMap.gif as "promotional" doesn't sound quite right; you can re-draw the map yourself or find one that is under a free license / in the public domain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that covers it.--Jorfer 02:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. GA. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Miami River (Florida)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

• The Commercial use section, almost half of the article is entirely uncited.

• Page number is missing for footnote #6.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • As these issues remain outstanding, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page number supplied. Something needs to be done about the Commercial use section. -- Donald Albury 16:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miami River (Florida). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060110194202/http://www.miamidade.gov/info/history.asp to http://www.miamidade.gov/info/history.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miami River (Florida). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609151528/http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/nav/indexmiamiriver.htm to http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/nav/indexmiamiriver.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]