Battle of Chustenahlah

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hey! I saw that Proto-Iroquoian has no page, unlike a lot of other reconstructed proto languages of North America, so I decided to make one. Chiefly I used Julian 2011 as my source, since he provides a complete reconstruction. Hopefully I'll expand this later with more notes on the phonemes and grammar, but I think this is alright for a start.

I suggest a section on the theorized time and place of origin of the language. I am not aware of papers which have explored this, but it is likely that a few exist.  — Jaspet 15:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I somehow overlooked the mention of Lounsbury (1961) on the page. It would be nice if there were more sources, however, and if so they could be used to separate such information into its own section of the page.  — Jaspet 15:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]