Battle of Chustenahlah

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Geography High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs Oklahoma Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Arkansas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance). Missouri Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Kansas Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm really puzzled by the inclusion of the Black Hills in this designation, as it seems to be quite separate geographically from the other areas. I took a look at "A Tapestry of Time and Terrain", and only "Ozark Plateaus" and "Ouachita province" are listed under Interior Highlands. So, what was the rationale for including the Black Hills? Cgingold 02:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's pretty clear. The article says "... between the Rocky Mountains and the Appalachian Mountains in the United States. The Ozarks and Ouachita Mountains are two of three mountain ranges in this expanse. The Black Hills of South Dakota is the other." Meaning the ozarks and the ouachitas are two of the three mountain ranges that exist between the rockies and the appalachians, and the black hills is the other mountain range that exists between the rockies and appalachians. The two refs at the end there cite the entire paragraph. The "A Tapestry of Time and Terrain" helps to cite that the black hills are also between the rockies and appalachians. Okiefromokla•talk 02:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I changed "this" to "that". Read it over again, it might make it more clear. Okiefromokla•talk 02:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forget all that. I just now changed the statement to make sure there's no confusion. It should be ok now. Okiefromokla•talk 03:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just remove the mention of the Black Hills altogether? Since they really have nothing to do with this article. Spiesr 15:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly doesn't matter to me. Feel free to remove it. The main point of having it in there was because of the claim that the Interior highlands is the only major highland region between the rockies and appalachians (which is cited by the source). Its basically just to clarify that there is another mountain range between the rockies and appalachians, even though its apparently not a "major highland region" according to the source. Okiefromokla•talk 16:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your responses and clarification. Cgingold 13:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Thanks for bringing this issue up. Okiefromokla•talk 20:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I popped onto this article, I was surprised that there wasn't a map to help the reader visually appreciate, in the context of the US (or North America, even) what part and portion of the country this refers to.

Unless I'm grossly mistaken, it seems that it would be a very helpful addition. Thanks! 68.65.37.10 (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason "U.S." is necessary?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]