Major General James G. Blunt


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

21 April 2024

12 April 2024

8 April 2024

7 April 2024

4 April 2024

  • curprev 17:4717:47, 4 April 2024Citation bot talk contribs 77,505 bytes +8 Altered title. Add: newspaper, chapter-url, isbn, publisher. Removed or converted URL. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 2452/2985

17 March 2024

13 March 2024

8 March 2024

28 February 2024

26 February 2024

23 February 2024

21 February 2024

20 February 2024

19 February 2024

18 February 2024

13 February 2024

  • curprev 16:1916:19, 13 February 2024Betty Logan talk contribs 74,435 bytes −19 No edit summary
  • curprev 16:1716:17, 13 February 2024Betty Logan talk contribs 74,454 bytes +3 No edit summary
  • curprev 16:1616:16, 13 February 2024Betty Logan talk contribs 74,451 bytes +750 Further analysis of coverage regarding men v women
  • curprev 14:1414:14, 13 February 2024Betty Logan talk contribs 73,701 bytes +4 Undid revision 1206875071 by 2600:100C:B021:3D83:14C1:39F3:7248:72EF (talk) It is fairly evident that this piece is discussing MWWS and not "damsel in distress" tropes". You are interjecting your own viewpoint by framing this as a "white woman vs black woman" phenomenon which is not borne out by the sources. Tag: Undo
  • curprev 13:1013:10, 13 February 20242600:100c:b000:13bd:d051:906e:83f8:2c4e talk 73,697 bytes −22 Fixing harvnb parameters, removing link to article that is non-existent/deleted
  • curprev 13:0613:06, 13 February 20242600:100c:b000:13bd:d051:906e:83f8:2c4e talk 73,719 bytes +2,330 Expanding Slakoff's review of the empirical evidence and added quotes to references, moved lengthy critiques to origins section Tag: harv-error
  • curprev 10:1710:17, 13 February 20242600:100c:b021:3d83:14c1:39f3:7248:72ef talk 71,389 bytes −4 Undid revision 1206592102 by Betty Logan (talk) "she must be atttactive -- also non-negotiable" does not reter to MWW but to the historical "damsel in distress" trope -- not to missing white women. Lede content cannot be synthesized using one WP:PRIMARY op-ed source, that does not cite any data, to create a context that isn't supported by the other referenes. Tags: Undo Reverted

12 February 2024

  • curprev 15:4615:46, 12 February 2024Betty Logan talk contribs 71,393 bytes +4 Reverted 3 edits by 2600:100C:B025:B9C8:AC04:5DE3:A5C:B22B (talk): The Robinson source touches on all of these issue: "The disappearance of a man, or of a woman of color, can generate a brief flurry, but never the full damsel treatment ... she must be attractive -- also nonnegotiable." Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

11 February 2024

  • curprev 22:5722:57, 11 February 20242600:100c:b025:b9c8:ac04:5de3:a5c:b22b talk 71,389 bytes −4 No edit summary Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 22:5622:56, 11 February 20242600:100c:b025:b9c8:ac04:5de3:a5c:b22b talk 71,393 bytes +36 Changed "female" →women, specifying from Armstrong 2013 Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 22:5022:50, 11 February 20242600:100c:b025:b9c8:ac04:5de3:a5c:b22b talk 71,357 bytes −36 The source material (Robinson 2005; Armstrong 2013) does not say anything about the proportionality of female-to-*male* missing person cases. This context doesn't exist in the sources. It also does not say that attractiveness is a common criterion, but that in one sample of MWW, their attractiveness was emphasized in media reports. Tag: Reverted

6 February 2024

4 February 2024

3 February 2024

18 January 2024

9 January 2024

2 January 2024

1 January 2024

16 December 2023

15 December 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)