Major General James G. Blunt

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance). U.S. Congress High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) person(s). United States: Indiana Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance). Islam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. African diaspora Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

A lot of Carson's policies are described with almost campaignesque descriptions. If this is a quote from his platform, it should be clearly marked as such. Else, this should be cleaned up with more neutral, encyclopedic language. Pseudo(Avicenna) (talk) 02:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This section should be retitled, "Things André Carson said that made white people uncomfortable." A section pertaining to the tenure of a 15-year incumbent should give a sense of their overall career: their priorities, achievements, setbacks, etc. This section merely lists two accusations of racism that Carson made:

1) His having said that he heard racial slurs hurled at Congressman John Lewis in 2010 and

2) His anti-Tea Party remarks invoking lynching

The first is deprecated by saying that "Although audio and video recordings of the protest have been posted online, no proof of the racial slurs has yet been provided, and the reward remains unclaimed."

1) Recordings of a crowd might easily have missed slurs that Rep. Carson heard.

2) Why, when a Black person claims to have heard a slur, must white people insist on "proof." This, in itself, is bias.

3) The source for the deprecating statement is the very biased Washington Times.

4) The link doesn't even work any more.

5) What reward? There's no prior mention explaining that a reward was offered or by whom.

Regarding the second, racism within the Tea Party movement is well documented, and while the Congressman's rhetoric was called out in the pages of the Washington Post by the liberal columnist Jonathan Capehart for being excessive^[1], it's not as if nooses never turn up at right-wing rallies, is it? I'm not saying that Rep. Carson's rhetoric was justified, just that the piling on in this section of the Wiki article is excessive. Perhaps it should be retitled "Controversies" and rewritten with a NPV and less biased sources, but right now, it is simply evidence of White fragility. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]