Major General James G. Blunt

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force

This article needs to be reconsidered. There were six Cavalry Corps in the Union Armies, not two:

1. Military Division of the Mississippi
2. Army of the Cumberland
3. Army of the Ohio
4. Army of the Potomac
5. Army of the Shenandoah
6. Military Division of West Mississippi (earlier named District of West Tennessee)

Since describing all six would be pretty cumbersome for a single article, I would recommend including the cavalry information in the articles about the armies, not separately. Unlike the infantry corps, which sometimes moved around from army to army, and therefore have separate identities, these cavalry corps were dedicated to specific armies. Just a suggestion. Hal Jespersen 18:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, most of what you call "corps" were really division-sized units. In the Western armies, no official cavalry corps existed until the indicated date.

And the Army of the Shenandoah cavalry was really the Army of the Potomac's.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cavalry Corps (Union Army). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050318195649/http://www.civilwararchive.com/CORPS/cavaop.htm to http://www.civilwararchive.com/CORPS/cavaop.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041214073337/http://www.civilwararchive.com/CORPS/cavuow.htm to http://www.civilwararchive.com/CORPS/cavuow.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The only citation listed does not discuss Union Cavalry Corps at all. The external link: Cavalry Corps (Armies of the West) discusses some, but not all of the material written. I happened upon this article when I tried to search for Israel Garrard. The article mentioned this individual as a cavalry division commander in the Atlanta campaign. I changed it to the correct name Kenner Garrard (Israel's brother). The article also stated that the Armies of the Cumberland and Tennessee contributed the cavalry in the Atlanta campaign. I also corrected this (Cumberland and Ohio, not Tennessee). This article desperately needs some sources (and possibly more editing), but I don't have the time to fix this right now. Djmaschek (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]