Major General James G. Blunt

Page contents not supported in other languages.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 27 external links on David Hicks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on David Hicks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo Liberation Army

I deleted some of the recently added stuff because I tried several times and failed to verify that the provided source says that Hicks joined ranks of African and Middle Eastern men in Albania. Relevant quotes from the source are needed. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is related to David Hicks and not a platform to promote a terrorist organisation in a brighter light. This is something you have consistently done over numerous articles across Wikipedia. If you do not like a section of the text then remove it with proper references. Removing sections of text and replacing it with references to the KLA as a Catholic organisation has nothing to do with the David Hicks page and will be removed. TryDeletingMe (talk) 15:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:TryDeletingMe, I'm afraid that post reads a lot like a personal attack. I know nothing of User:Ktrimi991's history. If there had been serious problems with their behaviour, surely action would have been taken. And I have a serious question. How does one remove a section with sources? That just sounds silly. Maybe you have a valid point to make, but you haven't made it there. HiLo48 (talk) 01:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
HiLo48 Thanks for your comment. You are right. I interact with many admins and experienced editors, and I report editors very frequently. So many people are aware of my actions, contributions and behaviour on Wikipedia. However, if TryDeletingMe feels there are reasons to believe I am not a constructive editor, they should file a report at the right place. I am ready to discuss my actions, and I hope TryDeletingMe is ready to discuss their own actions as well. Their history of editing shows that many of their edits are reverted due to being source misrepresentation or WP:OR. I do not want this small content dispute become Balkan Wikidrama. The spirit of Wikipedia is cooperation and good faith, not personal attacks, aspersions and depiction of people as supporters of terrorism. @TryDeletingMe Why does your comment have as timestamp 27 June? You made the comment on 18 August. Ktrimi991 (talk) 06:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the timestamp. Yes I am aware any pages related to the Balkans will rarely be able to suit all sides. However Ktrimi991 your recent edit "However, the KLA did not accept Islamic fundamentalism, and many of its fighters and fund raisers were Catholic" is an issue related to common sense. This has nothing to do with David Hicks as this section merely discusses David Hick's actions in Yugoslavia and Albania. If you take a look at my histories you can see for yourself you have a consistent track record of reverting my posts and causing edit wars. I am honestly flattered you would methodically subscribe to my posts and follow my actions, however it makes it difficult to make edits as you engage in edits that are not constructive. If you have a reference that states that the KLA had no foreign fighters from the Middle East then please add it to the talk page and then that comment can be removed. TryDeletingMe (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TryDeletingMe - that is a ridiculous request. It is pretty much impossible to prove a negative. HiLo48 (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since Hicks was not Islamic at this point, the whole discussion is moot. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Possibly useful ref

https://www.propublica.org/article/u.s.-acknowledges-conviction-of-david-hicks-guantanamo-detainee-not-valid All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Not chronological

Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Order_of_events suggests biographies be presented in chronological order, from birth to death, except where there is good reason to do otherwise. So I'm writing to find out what the good reason is for this article's sections to be ordered:

  • 1 Guantanamo Bay
  • 2 Return to Australia
  • 3 Early life
  • 4 Marriage and family
  • 5 Religious and militant activities

Cheers.--104.247.233.101 (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Hicks