Major General James G. Blunt

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: District of Columbia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance). National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. George Washington University Mid‑importance This article is related to the George Washington University Libraries’ Special Collections Research Center. Learn more about this collaborative project here.George Washington UniversityWikipedia:GLAM/GWUTemplate:WikiProject George Washington UniversityGeorge Washington University-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Reassessed as start; if the sources were better integrated, it would be a C class. --M@rēino 20:23, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on majorly restructuring this page in the coming days (sections, references, etc.) if anyone objects, speak now Thedofc (talk) 03:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgetown (Washington, D.C.) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Foggy Bottom is one of the oldest late 18th and 19th-century neighborhoods ..." How can you compare the ages of late 18th and 19th-century neighborhoods? Aren't they all, by definition, late 18th and 19th-century? Maproom (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Alley Life section is also odd. It refers repeatedly to "alleys" as areas large enough for many people to live in. But I have only ever come across the term used as in the Alley article, for a narrow lane or path between two buildings or city blocks. That article has some good pictures. If Washingtonians use the word in a different sense, it should be explained in the Alley Life section. Maproom (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article suggest foggy Bottom got its name because it was "susceptible to concentrations of fog and industrial smoke". I believe this is wrong, George Washington choose an swampy area called Foggy Bottom to build the capital. The whole area was called foggy Bottom long before any industrial smoke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.235.156 (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this sentence from the "Features" section should be reproduced in some form in the lead paragraph: "The name Foggy Bottom often is used as a metonym for the United States Department of State because its headquarters is in the neighborhood." This is the sense in which most people outside of D.C. itself would encounter the term and be drawn to Wikipedia to discover its meaning.--Schoolmann (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two sentences seem to contradict. "Late into the 20th century, Foggy Bottom witnessed a drastic change in demographics." and "Another factor of the change in demographics was orchestrated by Theodore G. Bilbo...". Theodore Bilbo died in the 1940s. I don't think something done in the 1930s or 40s would cause a dramatic shift in the 80s or 90s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.162.162.218 (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Foggy Bottom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010423073315/http://www.exploredc.org/index.php?id=73 to http://www.exploredc.org/index.php?id=73

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]