Major General James G. Blunt

	George Washington in the French and Indian War has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 26, 2011 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Military history: Biography / North America / United States / Early Modern This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

I spun this out from the main George Washington article. Maurreen 23:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. I'll try to shorten the French and Indian War section of Washington's article. --Nishkid64 01:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be no point in having this article. It contains almost nothing which is not already in the main George Washington article, and the corresponding section of the main article is no shorter than this one. Since the purpose of this article was apparently to make the main one shorter (see above), and nothing has been done about it in over a month, I propose to merge and redirect. I doubt that very much of this material can be removed from the main article anyway without making that section too uninformative. Richard75 16:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sure some dedicated user who has a talent for writing in summary style could accomplish that. One will come along. -Fsotrain₀₉ 17:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before in the history there was almost no evidences of what happened in the past. there was no information. But these days there is too much information every where you go you see George Washington born in different cities.

When it states in the article that he resigned after the battle at Fort Necessity, this is a complete historical innaccuracy Washinton would go on to fight in the war for several more years. Could Sombody please fix this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.46.24.46 (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:George Washington in the French and Indian War/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 05:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good, my comment and future comments will be located below.

• Comment(s)
  • Get a infobox. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 05:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are dates New Style or Old Style in this article? Clarify in the article.

Thanks for your review. I've added an infobox. The only date preceding the changeover to New Style is that of Washington's birth; I've added the explanatory footnote. Magic♪piano 18:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It still doesn't seem clear that the other dates are NS, please clarify that. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 05:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, clarified that. Magic♪piano 16:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. Passed. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 17:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]