This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Charlotte --> Jean --> Henri
That's mother to son to son, which is not matrilineal, it's bilineal.
http://www.gouvernement.lu/publications/grandduc/ap_famille_gdl/ap_famille_gdl_GB_DEF.pdf
Here's a link an official Luxembourg page that says, "Grand Duke Henri, the sixth sovereign
of the Nassau-Weilburg dynasty". If the Grand Duke considers himself part of a particular dynasty, to which he is related cognatically through his father and his grandmother, why should Wikipedia presume to say that that is not the dynasty to which he belongs? Ariadne55 (talk) 21:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It went through A MATERNAL LINE. There is nothing ambiguous about that whatsoever, all it means it went from a mother to a son at one point. It is very clear. I am convinced that you are just aiming in the dark trying to apply terminology that you do not fully understand. The current House of Nassau in Luxembourg, of which Henri is head, is a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon, of which Henri is a junior member. Wikipedia is not presuming that he is not a member of the House of Nassau-Weilburg but he is descended from it via a female line. Bilineal and bilateral are NOT the words to use. Charles 21:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was Jean's maternal line, but it was Henri's paternal line. What else would you call it when a line has passed through both men and women? Yes, you are presuming that he is not a member of the House of Nassau-Weilburg when you change the page from saying that he is a member of that house to saying that he is descended from it. You may consider him head of a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon, but his own government's page says he is "the sixth sovereign of the Nassau-Weilburg dynasty". Ariadne55 (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is still a female line when it is issued through one or more females, meaning specifically that it is not in the male line. He is descended from the first House of Nassau-Weilburg and a member of the second. His own page, of course, will force a POV that may not be in line with genealogical fact. Houses describe groups of agnates. Henri and his grandmother are not agnates because Henri is a female-line (note, not direct female line) descendant of her agnatic ancestors. I consider Henri to be head of his own house while still being a junior member of another. The same is true of the Windsors with regard first to the House of Wettin and then to the House of Oldenburg. A dynasty and a house are not the same thing, by the way. Charles 21:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Charles, this should be chnaged back to in the female line. Note that it's only in theory his own government, we the people have a little more say than he does.--Caranorn (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
