Major General James G. Blunt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Good articleInternational Finance Corporation has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Article Revision

This article is being discussed at the World Bank Group talk page. Please visit to participate in the discussion about the future of this article. --Brettbergeron 21:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been labeled as a "good article", howev er it should be noticed that the vast majority of references provided are from the corporation itself or its parent company/organisation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.3.114 (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial rewrite

I've just contributed a substantial rewrite of the entire article. It had been derelict for some time and neglected Wikipedia's core content policies, especially with regards to meeting WP:V and lacking necessary citations. I have removed the reference improvement tag. Any and all feedback on the rewrite would be appreciated. John Shandy`talk 00:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:International Finance Corporation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 21:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LEAD
I have expanded the lead to cover more of the most important concepts from each of the major sections. It now better summarizes the governance, membership, services, and financial performance of the IFC. The lead may have further to go, but I think it is now more thorough in summarizing the IFC. Anyone is of course welcome to comment on the lead or suggest further improvements. John Shandy`talk 22:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am in too much of a rush to read the content closely, but I see the new content is entirely unlinked. That seems odd. I will look more closely in a few hours.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that might cause concern, but I am conflicted about whether to link some of those things in the lead rather than in their actual sections; I sometimes diverge from linking the first occurrence of a concept word if it makes more sense to link it in an occurrence where it is surrounded with greater context (and where a reader may be more inclined to click it and read further). I'll wait for you to look at it more closely and offer some feedback, then I'll adjust accordingly. John Shandy`talk 00:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have gone ahead and linked some additional concepts and also unlinked a few things in the body to instead link them in the lead. It might could use a few more, but I think it's a step up - I agree that it looks weird if it's bare. John Shandy`talk 00:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
History
I have updated the 20th century dollar values to feature their present value representations in parentheses. John Shandy`talk 18:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have wikilinked those items. Bertin (Bertin Group) is now wikilinked to Grupo Bertin. John Shandy`talk 18:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have now made use of the As of template in all instances. John Shandy`talk 18:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've wikilinked it to Sustainability; there are lots of sustainability articles, but the main one is most relevant to the IFC's Environmental and Social Standards as it actually covers environmental, economic, and social sustainability.John Shandy`talk 18:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Investment services
  • "In its fiscal year 2010, the IFC invested $12.7 billion, of which 39% financed projects in the poorest nations" - How many countries? How many investments? Give us a range of investment sizes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Ottenhoff source doesn't specify the number of projects funded or countries served, but the annual report does. I have rewritten that content as: In its fiscal year 2010, the IFC invested $12.7 billion in 528 projects across 103 countries. Of that total investment commitment, approximately 39% ($4.9 billion) was invested into 255 projects across 58 member nations of the World Bank's International Development Association (IDA). which cites the 2010 Annual Report. I also cleaned up wikilinks for International Development Association and made sure that the acronym is defined here before it is used in subsequent sections. John Shandy`talk 02:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is a FEMSA article, but it is a beverage company in Latin America. I added a reference from the website for Bosch Spain (of which former FEMSA became a part) to help explain FEMSA and link the user to its present-day entity. I have also wikilinked private equity funds. John Shandy`talk 18:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Though related, they are two different things so I have linked stock markets to stock market (under History) and left stock exchange linked to stock exchange (under Investment services). John Shandy`talk 18:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent news! Thanks for taking the time to review it. John Shandy`talk 04:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dear

السلام عليكم تحية طيبة نود تواصل مع شركتكم لمل يخدم الصالح المشترك وهده الرسالة ترودد وتعارف مبدئي المدير المفوض خليل العكيدي — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.201.203.138 (talk) 07:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Finance Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on International Finance Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]