Major General James G. Blunt

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Countries This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles WikiProject Countries to-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy. Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region. Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess. Military history: National CL‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles CL This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force

USA is #1 if sorted by three KPIs, but somehow it's not first by the aggregate, how come? Aleck$ (talk) 11:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed BenjaminKay (talk) 23:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend for a start, that the text ".....as at YYYY." is added to the introduction. Secondly, a description or definition of what the "Global Militarization Index" actually measures (and how it is measured) would make a big difference. Also, does the list end at the United States, or was this merely a convenient cut-off point? Farawayman (talk) 16:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- there is a whole list http://www.bicc.de/our-work/gmi/gmi-table.html?year=2010&sort=rank_asc of countries, i wanted to make a start and chose to end with the usa so people can better measure the data since most militaries in the top 30 are unknown except for america, russia, israel and south korea. China, India and the other european countries are around 70th and 80th places. I hoped people would help me finishing the list as i am a bit lazy, or tell me how i can make lists very easy with computer programs or something.--Shokioto22 (talk) 17:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is a new article, you might could check with DYK qualifications, and see if lists are permitted. If you get it on the DYK section, alot more editors will take notice of it, and may offer to help improve it. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are some countries in italics? Boneyard90 (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...whether the table is supposed to be ordered by the GMI Index column, and if so, why Singapore is ahead of Syria or why Russia is on the list at all, if those values are accurate and up to date? Morgan Wick (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. ArticunoWebon (talk) 11:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The website seemed to have moved the original rank and replaced it with the actual columns, the new rank table is here http://www.bicc.de/old-site/index.php?page=ranking-table&year=2010&sort=index_desc The columns explain more about why they chose some countries but the main reason are these reasons as previously written.

comparison of military expenditures with its gross domestic product (GDP); health expenditure (as share of its GDP); contrast between the total number of (para)military forces and the number of physicians and the overall population; ratio of the number of heavy weapons available and the number of the overall population.--Shokioto22 (talk) 17:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the wrong map of russia

where is crimea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.140.208.77 (talk) 11:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which place is right ? #13 or #22 ? 178.94.230.212 (talk) 12:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently on 22. That might have been in vandalism. Adamgerber80 (talk) 11:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]