This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Encryption does not Conceal the Obvious.
If you send an encrypted message and immediately afterward a global increase in alert level with assorted particular activities happens then anyone watching and listening now has a clue to some part of your encryption. This may have been a reason or an element of a reason for sending it in clear. There are others, at least one of which is remarked on overleaf. Midgley (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In this case, the only reason to send the message in the clear was to send a single message: that the US was fully ready to act in case war. Yes, our codes and frequencies were probably blown that day. The US has never hidden its nuclear war-fighting capability, whether on the ground, on the sea, or in the air. General Power let everyone know it could be unleashed if the Soviets misplayed. The crisis was then solved. Best wishes!Learner001 (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
