Brigadier General James Monroe Williams

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) Thing(s). United States Constitution High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Constitution, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Constitution of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States ConstitutionWikipedia:WikiProject United States ConstitutionTemplate:WikiProject United States ConstitutionUnited States Constitution articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) thing(s). Politics: American High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

I have removed the following section from the article:

Secessionists have used Article VII to argue that states have a right to secede from the Union by revoking their ratification of the Constitution.

Virginia's ratification of the Constitution declared that, "the powers granted under the Constitution being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression."^[1] New York and Rhode Island's ratifications likewise declared that, "That the powers of government may be reassumed by the people, whensoever it shall become necessary to their happiness."^[2][3] The New York Convention also contemplated going a step farther, adding language to the effect that "there should be reserved to the state of New York a right to withdraw herself from the union after a certain number of years."^[4] The Madison federalists opposed this, with Hamilton, a delegate to the convention, reading aloud in response a letter from James Madison stating: "the Constitution requires an adoption in toto, and for ever" [emphasis added]. Hamilton and John Jay then told the convention that in their view, reserving "a right to withdraw [was] inconsistent with the Constitution, and was no ratification".^[4] The New York convention ultimately ratified the Constitution without including the "right to withdraw" language proposed by the anti-federalists.

At the start of the Civil War, four of the original thirteen states seceded from the Union, South Carolina, Georgia, Virginia, and North Carolina. In their ordinances of secession they declared that their newly elected conventions were repealing the acts of the previous conventions ratifying the Constitution.^[5] Abraham Lincoln maintained that secession was unconstitutional, and ultimately these States along with the other Confederate States were defeated.

This was "Revoked ratification" section, which discussed the idea of a State seceding from the Union by repealing or "revoking" its ratification of the Constitution. This section provided no sourcing for its premise (see its first sentence) and has insufficient for the rest of what it says. Unless sufficient reliable sourcing is provided, this section should not be in the article. SMP0328. (talk) 02:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think this section should be re-added. However, the first sentence can be deleted. I believe that the rest is adequately sourced. I cited to the ratification instruments themselves for the statement that several States claimed a right to revoke ratification when they ratified. The next several sentences were borrowed from the article on Secession in the United States. If those sentences were adequately sourced for that article then they should be for this one as well. Finally, I cited the ordinances of secession themselves for the statement that those States were repealing their ratifications of the Constitution. Emperor001 (talk) 19:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]