Brigadier General James Monroe Williams

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Fortifications / North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force

Is the image of Storming Fort Wagner reversed? Avalon 00:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you were refering to the older version of the image [1], then yes, it was reversed. A newer, correct, version of the image has since been uploaded [2]. Jatkins 19:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1.I need to know the casualties please. I use this site for school. Everyone here does.

2.I need to know how much artillery was in the battle for the Union And the amount of infantry for the Union.

Read the heading. Vote.

I say "in favour".

The Duke of Fort Wagner 03:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Official vote is located here.

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone lead me to pics of what it looks like now? The only images I can seem to find are artwork of the battles. Hanz ofbyotch (talk) 21:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not much there any more. Check out http://www.civilwar.org/preservation/morrisisland/Photo%20Gallery/Modern%20Day.htm Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've divided this into sections and re-arranged the content a bit, but it should all still be there. Does anyone know what the current situation is? I thought I saw somewhere the site was being built on. Xyl 54 (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve moved a large chunk of text to here; it’s in the wrong place (it should be at Second Battle of Fort Wagner) but I’m not even sure if it should be included anywhere. See discussion here on the subject. Xyl 54 (talk) 12:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The regiment that fought in the battle of Fort Wagner is the 54'th regiment. The 54'th regiment was the first African-American regiment in the war. This regiment also fought for the union but was still a heated discution among the North. Many people were open to the idea of free African-Americans but not the idea of rights for all.

This battle prooved to the north that all races have the same spirit and pride of their country on the battle field.

At the end of the battle the south burried the caucation general with his army (the 54'th regiment) because they viewed this as an insult. But instead the general's parents thanked the south for doing so. As thoughtfully shown in the movie Glory.

• Actually the 1st Kansas Cavalry (colored) was in action in the West before the 54th saw combat. And the 1st South Carolina (U.S.) and 1st North Carolina (U.S.) were also formed, although unofficially. People just think the 54th was the first African-American regiment because they got all the press.Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 02:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this since it has no place in the article. The article is for facts, not opinions on the treatments of blacks leading up to the present day.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Wagner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930220109/http://www.historynet.com/magazines/american_civil_war/3035986.html to http://www.historynet.com/magazines/american_civil_war/3035986.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]