Brigadier General James Monroe Williams

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Geography Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

This name is hardly widespread across the country as a term for Ontario and Quebec. If you were to ask most British Columbians where 'Central Canada' was, they would likely answer Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Ontario and Quebec are simply Eastern Canada, as they very obviously are geographically. I've never heard "Central Canada" except as used by Ontarians, although I understand that residents of the Atlantic Provinces use it too. 38.112.113.242 19:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. You give an extreme example (people from BC). I could give an equally extreme example - to a Newfoundlander all the rest of us are "the west".

While the geographic center of Canada might be somewhere in Manitoba, it is "very" common usage in "the West" (where I'm from) to refer to Toronto as "the center of the universe", and, if we differentiate the easternmost provinces from the big two that are in the middle (at least going both by size and which are currently holding the bulk of the population), you then have three regions, "west, "east" and "central". Often, because it is so vast and so different, we slice off a fourth piece and call it "the north". But let's use some basic logic. How many different names you end up with for different regions really depends on into how many pieces you decide to cut the pie. The most logical and easiest way is by province and territory. Otherwise you might as well still refer to my part of the country as "Rupert's Land".

Many of my fellow Westerners (many of whom have not ever spent much time in "the east" (except for perhaps the odd flight to Toronto) will only cut the pie into two pieces - "west" and "east" - "us" and "them" - and the most common place I'm seen that arbitrary boundary placed is somewhere near Thunder Bay. But for those of us from "the west" who have spent a lot of time in Atlantic Canada, we are more inclined to refer to Ontario and Quebec as "central Canada" (when being polite).Garth of the Forest 22:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the former districts of Canada? Surely they should be mentioned. Alx xlA 04:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Can-pol w.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, there are problems with this section, and a long debate behind them, I think which might be at Talk:Geographic regions of British Columbia but also in places like Talk:Interior of British Columbia and Talk:Lower Mainland, as well as on the Regional Districts pages/talkpages. Essentially the list as given combines apples and oranges, i.e. traditoinal "country" designations with an RD in one case and a tourism promo district in another (I removed it, the reference to the marketing-board-created "British Columbia Rockies" which is actually the same thing as the Kootenays; List of official tourism regions of British Columbia would be the place rfor that along with Coast Cariboo Chilcotin or whatever it's called, and the non sequitur Rainbow Country (Chilliwack), which is really the Upper Fraser Valley and has more rain than rainbows...anyway here's the current list, plust my comments; a corrected list will follow once I'm done, this probably will have to be saved in the meantime in case I have to sign off (battery's low).

• British Columbia Interior
  • Cariboo
  • Kootenays
  • Okanagan
  • Nechako Plateau - this is a geographic feature, not a refgion per se; Nechako Country maybe, although with Omineca Coujntry and Bulkley Country this is really what's meant when people say Northern Interior of British Columbia....confusingly though Prince George, the largest city in the area, considers itself Central Interior. Not sure what to do here, User:CindyBo, who lives in PG, and I have debated it; region can be defined by Highway 16 more or less but this isn't "the Yellowhead Country", which lies (to me) upstream from PG (i.e. SE of it, not NW). Interior section could theoretically be broken down into Northern, Central and Southenr, if only there were some kind of way of defining those areas; Kamloops considers itselrf Central Interior, but to a PGer it's Southern; and Southern Interior now is a riding spanning the Okanagan and the West Kootenay combined; Northern Interior in usage often doesn't mean the Peace River Country, and as noted in PG terms doesn't include that city e3ven though it includes the regions immediately around it....all very confusing.
  • Peace River Country
  • Thompson Nicola This needs to be broken into Thompson Country and Nicola Country; it currently redirects to an RD pagbe; granted the Thompson-Nciola RD is one of the only ones whose boundaries and names haven't changed (much) but it's out of pladfe here, especially because it includes part of Cariboo; Other Interior areas missing here are the Fraser Canyon (as a region, not a geographic feature, and which includes part of the Thompson Country as well as the Lillooet Country and parts of both the Chilcotin and Cariboo...and in RD terms the Upper Fraser Valley RD a well as teh SLRD and TNRD; anyway other equivalents here are Similkameen Country (parallel to the Nicola in size in fact), Boundary Country, Columbia Country, Shuswap Country, Chilcotin Country; Boundary Country could be subsection, along with Slocan Country, inside the Kootenays section.
• Lower Mainland - as below should be subsection of Coast of British Columbia, i.e. as part of South Coast
  • Metro Vancouver
  • Fraser Valley
  • Sea to Sky Corridor - has to be included somewhere, and not really part of the Lower Mainland, though in practical/operational terms it is, and overlaps parttly with theLillooet Country. Lately rebranded {Sea to Sky Country} but for years it was "the Corrridor"
• Gulf Islands - should be included in "South Coast"; I won't bother commenting further in this setion but will simply post a rearrangemnet of it in the rewritten section below.
• Queen Charlotte Islands
• North Coast
• Sunshine Coast
• Vancouver Island
  • Greater Victoria.

• revised list
• British Columbia Interior
  • Cariboo
  • Kootenays
  • Okanagan
  • Nechako Country
  • Bulkley Country
  • Peace River Country
  • Thompson Nicola
• [[Coast of British Columbia]BC Coast]]
  • South Coast
    • Lower Mainland
      • Metro Vancouver
      • Fraser Valley
    • Sunshine Coast
    • Sea to Sky Corridor
    • Vancouver Island
    • Gulf Islands
    • Greater Victoria
• North Coast
  • Queen Charlotte Islands
  • Nass Country
  • Skeena Country (often in practical usage spoken of as Northern Interior especially in comnbination with adjacrent Bulkley Country]]
  • there is no region article, or usefrul designation, for the central coiast communities/regions; thte southern ones are part of the North Island (which needs a region article) in practial terms, from Kitimat/Hartley Bay up it's North Coast, more or less.

These are just notes for now, also to maybe excplain things a bit for editors from other parts of Canada; I've tried to sort out this list, hoping others will tweak my notes but I'll wait before posting to main article. I hope y'all see my point here; the list cannot be abbreviated if it's going to include particulars of any kind (e.g the Charlottes as part of North Coast) and it also sholuldn't mix parameters, i.e. RDs vs other regional designations/definitions.Skookum1 (talk) 14:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the listing, which had come to read Metro Vancouver, I suppose because of a double-redirect issue, guess I'll go back and pipe that; the issue is that Metro Vancouver is not a region, it is a regional district, a government in that region. It's not the same thing; and in a way Metro Vancouver is of such a recent coinage and also political intent (and it does have a political intent). Greater VAncouver is a concept, Metro Vancouver is a brand name, basically put. And it's only coincidence, and somewhat design, that Greater Vancouver and the Greater Vancouver Regional District (now Metro Vancouver) are near-identical in landscape; but the other links in this section go to region articles, and pointedly not to regional district articles......so it's also a question of not mixing different kinds of links in a list....Skookum1 (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But I know many people who call Greater Vancouver Metro Vancouver and seen it many discussion forums. Happyperson25 (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some one put a sad face ): just before the big chart of Canada's regions! JoJaEpp (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a sad face, that's a closed bracket with a colon after it to initiate the start of the list. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 12:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing to move incorporated local and regional jurisdictions from the list of regions and subregions of Alberta to the article's talk page. These jurisdictions are fully duplicated in a separate list article that specialises in this info. My understanding of "regions" is that they are primarily geographic, cultural, or economic in nature. They generally do not comprise individual counties, regional municipalities, regional districts, judicial districts, territorial districts, improvment districts, or electoral areas. However several of these kinds of districts may be grouped into a region if they have certain geographical, economic, or cultural traits in common. I'll wait a couple of weeks to allow for other comments, but I may move these districts to the talk pages if I see no opposition to doing so from other editors. Even then, the removed content can be returned to the mains list/article if there is a later editorial consensus to do so. Should that happen though, I will then have to consider adding lists of counties and regional districts from the other provinces that have these kinds of internal divisions. This could make for a very long and never-ending Wikipedia list of Canadian "regions". ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31 (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

J'aime la wikipedia, même si c'est en anglais. Je peut juste aller sur Google Traduction et fait anglais à français traduction! Ça m'aide beaucoup! Merci!

This list has been rather volatile because of an apparent lack of consensus about how the regions should be defined. As with the Alberta regions, I believe any significant regions that can be identified in Sask. should be mainly geographic or administrative at a supra-municipal level. I think tourism regions are too specialized and narrow in scope to be included here. All the provinces have tourism regions, but the Saskatchewan regions of this type are the only regions in this list, which is a sign of inconsistent criteria for including or excluding regions of provinces. The main Wikipedia article for this province identifies 2 primary geographic regions in Saskatchewan based on topography; Northern Saskatchewan which occupies that provinces section of the Canadian Shield, and Southern Saskatchewan that comprises the province's section of the prairie grassland. This division seems to make a lot of sense and is consistent with the criteria for the other provinces. Accordingly, I'm not erasing the tourism regions from this project for now, but moving them from the main list to this section of the discussion page so that interested editors can consider the future, if any, of these regions in this article list. However, I have to point out that as with the removal of municipal regional municipalities from the lists for some provinces, reinstating the tourism regions to the Sask. list would require adding the tourism regions for all the other provinces and territories as well. This again would make for a very long unwieldy list that would swamp these pages with dubious regional listings.

These are the Sask. tourism regions moved to this page from the main article list:

"The Government of Saskatchewan divides the province into three tourism regions:^[1] Northern Saskatchewan tourism region, Central Saskatchewan tourism region, and Southern Saskatchewan tourism region." ~~ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31 (talk) 13:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]