Brigadier General James Monroe Williams

Page contents not supported in other languages.

Fair use rationale for Image:Charge of the light brigade.jpeg

Image:Charge of the light brigade.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Charge of the Light Brigade .jpeg

Image:The Charge of the Light Brigade .jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale added to image article. Johnmc (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong uniforms

The inaccuracies in the uniforms pointed out here seem plausible—certainly Cardigan paid a lot of money to have just his own regiment, the 11th Hussars, in cherry trousers—but one reference work (Connolly 2003) praises John Mollo, the costume researcher, for his work. {{Cn}} request for some clarification.--Old Moonraker (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cast Notes section is incoherent

There is a reference to Joseph E. Levine but not how he was involved. There is a reference to a lengthy settlement but no reference to the lawsuit that was necessarily concluded by that lawsuit. There is a reference to a falling out between Tony Richardson and John Osborne because that later refused to alter his script, but no reason why, apparently, Richardson asked for alternations (was it to avoid having to credit the Woodham-Smith book?). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.76.166.50 (talk) 16:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of background section

The historical background section needs to be rewritten. It has several POV statements. Such as "with their slightly unhinged head of state", "the British troops were incredibly brave and fierce", and the shocking statement that soldiers could be "debilitated by cholera, drunkenness and syphilis." Thank you kindly. --Meanderingbartender (talk) 08:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]