Colonel William A. Phillips

9 April 2024

• curprev 12:5112:51, 9 April 2024‎ Coalah talk contribs‎ m 47,301 bytes +4‎ No edit summary

8 April 2024

• curprev 16:3116:31, 8 April 2024‎ Darknipples talk contribs‎ 47,297 bytes −82‎ no consensus for these changes to the lead. I tend to agree with Aquillion - while Kent Smetters of the Wharton school may have a valid opinion, it does not need to be presented in Wikivoice Tag: Undo
• curprev 16:1116:11, 8 April 2024‎ Bonewah talk contribs‎ 47,379 bytes +51‎ →‎top Tag: Reverted
• curprev 16:1016:10, 8 April 2024‎ Bonewah talk contribs‎ 47,328 bytes +31‎ →‎top: first take at tweaking. RS's say it is not an economic term and so we should as well. Tag: Reverted
• curprev 16:0616:06, 8 April 2024‎ Bonewah talk contribs‎ 47,297 bytes −222‎ Restored revision 1217242563 by AnomieBOT (talk): Per talk, restoring and tweaking Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

5 April 2024

• curprev 13:3213:32, 5 April 2024‎ Bonewah talk contribs‎ 47,519 bytes +222‎ Restored revision 1217152526 by 78.99.186.35 (talk): This was discussed at lenght, please take this change to talk. Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted

4 April 2024

• curprev 17:3517:35, 4 April 2024‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ 47,297 bytes +263‎ Rescuing orphaned refs ("Noah2011" from rev 1217152526) Tag: Reverted
• curprev 17:2017:20, 4 April 2024‎ Aquillion talk contribs‎ m 47,034 bytes +15‎ tweak wording Tag: Reverted
• curprev 17:1917:19, 4 April 2024‎ Aquillion talk contribs‎ 47,019 bytes +27‎ moving bit about supply-side economics to the next paragraph, since the article contains a bunch of sources indicating that the term doesn't just refer to that. Tag: Reverted
• curprev 17:1317:13, 4 April 2024‎ Aquillion talk contribs‎ 46,992 bytes −527‎ I think part of the problem is this recent rewrite to the first sentence of the lead; the sources used for it are lower-quality than the academic sources used elsewhere in the article. Tag: Reverted
• curprev 03:5203:52, 4 April 2024‎ 78.99.186.35 talk‎ 47,519 bytes +316‎ I think this site is unclear because it gives impression there is are some coherent economic theories that are called trickle down. However, the term is used inconsistently and do not represent coherent economic theory. I made previous edit that was reversed, it was my mistake I am new to wikipedia, this time I used source that was already used in this article and thus I believe it is reliable. I also did not do any editorializing, I almost quoted the article. Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 01:4501:45, 4 April 2024‎ Grayfell talk contribs‎ 47,203 bytes −1,093‎ Reverted good faith edits by 78.99.186.35 (talk): Editorializing and WP:OR. Summarize source about the term without adding interpretation of those sources Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 00:0300:03, 4 April 2024‎ 78.99.186.35 talk‎ 48,296 bytes +1,093‎ I added some clarification with reference to inconsistent usage of the term, and also mentioned modern 21st century usage of the term that is much more broad the original 20th century usage of the term and supported it with an example. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

2 April 2024

• curprev 20:3420:34, 2 April 2024‎ JMF talk contribs‎ 47,203 bytes −6‎ Undid revision 1216926328 by 199.127.114.203 (talk) rv vandalism, false edit summary Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:5219:52, 2 April 2024‎ 199.127.114.203 talk‎ 47,209 bytes +6‎ Added clarification Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 February 2024

• curprev 09:5709:57, 13 February 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 47,203 bytes −49‎ Altered title. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Wikipedia articles with style issues from January 2024 | #UCB_Category 103/510

25 January 2024

• curprev 11:4511:45, 25 January 2024‎ Karma1998 talk contribs‎ 47,252 bytes +43‎ No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

23 January 2024

• curprev 02:4702:47, 23 January 2024‎ Wbm1058 talk contribs‎ m 47,209 bytes 0‎ redirect bypass from Reagonomics to Reaganomics using popups

2 January 2024

• curprev 04:0004:00, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 47,209 bytes +430‎ →‎Objections to the term: another objection, source
• curprev 03:2003:20, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,779 bytes 0‎ →‎Usage: move to broader use section
• curprev 02:5502:55, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ m 46,779 bytes −1‎ →‎Background: combine technical descriptions of early use
• curprev 02:4902:49, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,780 bytes +87‎ HW bush to chronological order
• curprev 02:2902:29, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,693 bytes +16‎ →‎Usage: reorganize info a bit (just arranging)
• curprev 02:1502:15, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ m 46,677 bytes −5‎ →‎Usage: layout
• curprev 02:1302:13, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,682 bytes +261‎ sort some economic analyses together, Krugman's blog is actually more about the political failure of tax cuts than a discussion of the economic merits
• curprev 01:1001:10, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ m 46,421 bytes −1‎ →‎Stockman's statements: layout
• curprev 01:1001:10, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,422 bytes −143‎ →‎Economics: I've read the whole article, no reference to the panic of 1896.
• curprev 01:0401:04, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,565 bytes −473‎ →‎Economics: rm duplicate information
• curprev 01:0201:02, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 47,038 bytes +19‎ merge to relevant section
• curprev 00:4700:47, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 47,019 bytes +38‎ →‎Stockman's statements: more close to quote
• curprev 00:4500:45, 2 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,981 bytes +762‎ add more context to the stockman quotes, organization

1 January 2024

• curprev 23:1023:10, 1 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,219 bytes +27‎ →‎History: Galbraith doesn't actually claim this, he just repeats the claim. The decade is also not in the source
• curprev 22:4522:45, 1 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,192 bytes +37‎ there's too many quotes breaking up the organization here
• curprev 22:3722:37, 1 January 2024‎ Andrevan talk contribs‎ 46,155 bytes 0‎ derisive -> critical Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 22:2822:28, 1 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ m 46,155 bytes +1‎ sp
• curprev 22:2322:23, 1 January 2024‎ Forbes72 talk contribs‎ 46,154 bytes +1,236‎ bring the critical connotation of the phrase more front and center, add sources

25 December 2023

• curprev 05:2105:21, 25 December 2023‎ OAbot talk contribs‎ m 44,918 bytes +17‎ Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot.

20 December 2023

• curprev 14:3114:31, 20 December 2023‎ Andrevan talk contribs‎ m 44,901 bytes +14‎ Replaced VE ref names using RefRenamer
• curprev 14:3014:30, 20 December 2023‎ Andrevan talk contribs‎ 44,887 bytes −524‎ →‎Economics Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 14:2914:29, 20 December 2023‎ Andrevan talk contribs‎ 45,411 bytes −4‎ ce Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 14:2814:28, 20 December 2023‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 45,415 bytes +74‎ Alter: date. Add: s2cid, doi, jstor, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Andrevan | #UCB_toolbar
• curprev 14:2614:26, 20 December 2023‎ Andrevan talk contribs‎ m 45,341 bytes −20‎ Replaced VE ref names using RefRenamer
• curprev 14:2614:26, 20 December 2023‎ Andrevan talk contribs‎ 45,361 bytes +852‎ add Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

19 December 2023

• curprev 05:1205:12, 19 December 2023‎ WikiCleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 44,509 bytes −1‎ v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) Tag: WPCleaner

17 December 2023

• curprev 23:1523:15, 17 December 2023‎ JaHolo talk contribs‎ 44,510 bytes +15‎ definition expanded per source; alternative uses of the term moved into a new paragraph; unnecessary big words dumbed down so it's readable

14 December 2023

• curprev 21:5821:58, 14 December 2023‎ Andrevan talk contribs‎ 44,495 bytes +739‎ Restored revision 1189781180 by OAbot (talk): Revert consensus-less changes Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 19:0719:07, 14 December 2023‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ 43,756 bytes +564‎ Rescuing orphaned refs ("lis truss favours" from rev 1189898909) Tag: Reverted
• curprev 18:5518:55, 14 December 2023‎ Bonewah talk contribs‎ 43,192 bytes −1,159‎ →‎Usage: Remove POV nonsense, the Laffer curve is cited as fact in numerous modern econ textbooks. Tag: Reverted
• curprev 18:5218:52, 14 December 2023‎ Bonewah talk contribs‎ 44,351 bytes −144‎ →‎top: We define it ourselves as a derogatory term, not a scientific one. How can numerous studies refute something that isnt a scientific term in the first place? Tag: Reverted

13 December 2023

• curprev 23:5323:53, 13 December 2023‎ OAbot talk contribs‎ m 44,495 bytes +51‎ Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot.