Colonel William A. Phillips Main menu Main menu move to sidebar hide Navigation Main pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaContact usDonate Contribute HelpLearn to editCommunity portalRecent changesUpload file Search Search Create account Log in Personal tools Create account Log in Pages for logged out editors learn more ContributionsTalk Contents move to sidebar hide (Top) 1Atlantic 10 standings 2References Toggle the table of contents Add languages Add links ArticleTalk English ReadView history Tools Tools move to sidebar hide Actions ReadView history General What links hereRelated changesUpload fileSpecial pagesPermanent linkPage informationCite this pageGet shortened URLDownload QR codeWikidata item Print/export Download as PDFPrintable version This is a list of yearly Atlantic 10 Conference football standings. Atlantic 10 standings 1997 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L New England Division New Hampshire x 5 – 3 5 – 6 Connecticut 4 – 4 7 – 4 Maine 4 – 4 5 – 6 Rhode Island 2 – 6 2 – 9 Boston University 1 – 7 1 – 10 UMass 1 – 7 2 – 9 Mid-Atlantic Division No. 1 Villanova x$^ 8 – 0 12 – 1 No. 3 Delaware ^ 7 – 1 12 – 2 No. 20 Northeastern 5 – 3 8 – 3 Richmond 4 – 4 6 – 5 William & Mary 4 – 4 7 – 4 James Madison 3 – 5 5 – 6 $ – Conference championx – Division champion/co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 1998 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L New England Division No. 1 UMass x^ 6 – 2 12 – 3 No. 9 Connecticut x^ 6 – 2 10 – 3 Maine 3 – 5 6 – 5 New Hampshire 3 – 5 4 – 7 Rhode Island 2 – 6 3 – 8 Mid-Atlantic Division No. 10 Richmond x$^ 7 – 1 9 – 3 No. 23 Delaware 4 – 4 7 – 4 Villanova 4 – 4 6 – 5 No. 17 William & Mary 4 – 4 7 – 4 Northeastern 3 – 5 5 – 6 James Madison 2 – 6 3 – 8 $ – Conference championx – Division champion/co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 1999 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L No. 13 James Madison +^ 7 – 1 8 – 4 No. 7 UMass +^ 7 – 1 9 – 4 No. 24 Villanova 6 – 2 7 – 4 Delaware 5 – 3 7 – 4 William & Mary 5 – 3 6 – 5 Connecticut 3 – 5 4 – 7 Maine 3 – 5 4 – 7 New Hampshire 3 – 5 5 – 6 Richmond 3 – 5 5 – 6 Northeastern 1 – 7 2 – 9 Rhode Island 1 – 7 1 – 10 + – Conference co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 2000 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L No. 3 Delaware +^ 7 – 1 12 – 2 No. 6 Richmond +^ 7 – 1 10 – 3 UMass 5 – 3 7 – 4 James Madison 4 – 4 6 – 5 New Hampshire 4 – 4 6 – 5 William & Mary 4 – 4 5 – 6 Maine 3 – 5 5 – 6 Villanova 3 – 5 5 – 6 Rhode Island 2 – 6 3 – 8 Northeastern 1 – 7 4 – 7 + – Conference co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 2001 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L No. 11 Hofstra +^ 7 – 2 9 – 3 No. 10 Maine +^ 7 – 2 9 – 3 No. 20 Villanova + 7 – 2 8 – 3 No. 17 William & Mary +^ 7 – 2 8 – 4 No. 21 Rhode Island 6 – 3 8 – 3 Delaware 4 – 5 4 – 6 Northeastern 4 – 5 5 – 6 UMass 3 – 6 3 – 8 Richmond 3 – 6 3 – 8 New Hampshire 2 – 7 4 – 7 James Madison 0 – 9 2 – 9 + – Conference co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 2002 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L No. 6 Maine $^ 7 – 2 11 – 3 No. 11 Northeastern $^ 7 – 2 10 – 3 No. 4 Villanova ^ 6 – 3 11 – 4 UMass 6 – 3 8 – 4 William & Mary 5 – 4 6 – 5 Richmond 4 – 5 4 – 7 Delaware 4 – 5 6 – 6 Hofstra 4 – 5 6 – 6 James Madison 4 – 6 5 – 7 New Hampshire 2 – 7 3 – 8 Rhode Island 1 – 8 3 – 9 + – Conference co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 2003 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L No. 1 Delaware +^ 8 – 1 15 – 1 No. 11 UMass +^ 8 – 1 10 – 3 No. 20 Northeastern 6 – 3 8 – 4 No. 25 Villanova 5 – 4 7 – 4 Maine 4 – 4 6 – 5 William & Mary 4 – 4 5 – 5 James Madison 4 – 5 6 – 6 New Hampshire 3 – 6 5 – 7 Rhode Island 3 – 6 4 – 8 Hofstra 2 – 6 2 – 10 Richmond 1 – 8 2 – 9 + – Conference co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 2004 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L North Division No. 6 New Hampshire x^ 6 – 2 11 – 3 UMass 4 – 4 6 – 5 Northeastern 4 – 4 5 – 6 Hofstra 3 – 5 5 – 6 Maine 3 – 5 5 – 6 Rhode Island 2 – 6 4 – 7 South Division No. 1 James Madison x^ 7 – 1 13 – 2 No. 3 William & Mary x^ 7 – 1 11 – 3 No. 7 Delaware x^ 7 – 1 9 – 4 Villanova 3 – 5 6 – 5 Richmond 2 – 6 3 – 8 Towson 0 – 8 3 – 8 x – Division champion/co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 2005 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L North Division No. 5 New Hampshire x+^ 7 – 1 11 – 2 No. 19 UMass 6 – 2 7 – 4 Hofstra 5 – 3 8 – 4 Maine 3 – 5 5 – 6 Northeastern 2 – 6 3 – 9 Rhode Island 2 – 6 4 – 7 South Division No. 8 Richmond x+^ 7 – 1 9 – 4 No. 25 James Madison 5 – 3 7 – 4 Towson 3 – 5 7 – 4 Delaware 3 – 5 6 – 5 William & Mary 3 – 5 5 – 6 Villanova 2 – 6 4 – 7 + – Conference co-championsx – Division champion/co-champions^ – NCAA Division I-AA playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll 2006 Atlantic 10 Conference football standings Conf Overall Team W L W L North Division No. 2 UMass x$^ 8 – 0 13 – 2 No. 6 New Hampshire ^ 5 – 3 9 – 4 Maine 5 – 3 6 – 5 Northeastern 4 – 4 5 – 6 Rhode Island 2 – 6 4 – 7 Hofstra 1 – 7 2 – 9 South Division No. 9 James Madison x^ 7 – 1 9 – 3 Villanova 5 – 3 6 – 5 Towson 4 – 4 7 – 4 Richmond 3 – 5 6 – 5 Delaware 3 – 5 5 – 6 William & Mary 1 – 7 3 – 8 $ – Conference championx – Division champion/co-champions^ – FCS playoff participantRankings from The Sports Network poll References NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision conference standingsActive Big Sky Big South CAA Independents Ivy MEAC MVFC NEC OVC Patriot PFL SoCon 1921–1971 1972–present Southland SWAC WAC Defunct Atlantic 10 Great West MAAC Mid-Continent New England Yankee Toggle limited content width