Colonel William A. Phillips

Page contents not supported in other languages.

Untitled

The Iraq policy portion of this entry was written by a moveon.org staffer, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.40.18 (talk) 05:57, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

"Constituent response to Baird's position has been overwhelmingly negative." This parargraph is so BS! The left erupts in rage (six hundred people! The vast majority thereof! My God what a maddening crowd!) and their "viewpoint" is somehow passed on to the entire constituency, if not the entire American people. It goes to show that the Investor's Business Daily editorial on the matter (Traitor Against Surrender) is right on the money. Asteriks 09:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Folks, the purpose of this discussion page is to improve the article, not chat about our opinions of it. I realize the previous comments were on an earlier version of the article, but I think at present, we have a version that is very much in line with the cited sources (which are two of the region's papers of record.) Anyone with further concerns, please be specific. -Pete (talk) 08:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed "There has been strong negative response to Baird's change in position" as commentary.--Jersey Devil (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baird's website hacked

Notable video of Baird at YouTube has had more than 400,000 views in less than a week.

Closing as moot per WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive572#Grundle2600:_continued_problems
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

This video of Baird at YouTube has had more than 400,000 views in less than a week, and the video was reported on by Fox News. Grundle2600 (talk) 23:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brian Baird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]