Colonel William A. Phillips

Copyright violations

I boldly removed sections of this page that were copied verbatim from salinacitygo.com. There is no licensing information on that website that is accepted by Wikipedia nor is it a government agency. You may readd this information, but please use your own words. (diff)

(Oh, and thanks for writing this article. I'm a high school student in Salina and I've been meaning to write this but hey! heh.) --Ian Weller (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'm a highschooler at MHS in Manhattan and I thank you for your contributions. I'm trying to get articles in detail about every bus (and hopefully rail soon) transportation aspect of Kansas. I have Lyon County, Hutch, and Hays to go. Anyway, any help on this particular article you can help out on. Thank you so much.

On the other hand, I dont think that the information that was cited from the CityGo website was out of order, but i suppose we can find other ways to inetgrate it. Thanks. WaltBren (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling out OCCK

As a Salina local I never see OCCK written out when they are being discussed. The full name, as far as most Salinians are concerned, is "OCCK, Inc." Perhaps the link to the (currently non-existent) article should be adjusted, and the article on OCCK would have it spelled out? --Ian Weller (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats what I had it at originally, Just OCCK, Inc. I think Secondarywaltz changed it. WaltBren (talk) 00:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was just being a little cheeky - because nobody will know what OCCK means. Acronyms should be explained when they are not obvious, especially when a full article is doubtful. Perhaps people in Kansas know what OCCK is, but not in Outer Mongolia or Upper Canada. I do agree that OCCK seems to have become the name and they have dropped the full spell out; just like IBM or YMCA. But those letters stand for something! Now. . . . Can you help me add links to the route table to illustrate the extent of the service? You are probably more aware of local wikipedia content than I am. How about SRHC? Is it worth an article more than OCCK? Secondarywaltz (talk) 02:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on CityGo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]