Colonel William A. Phillips

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) person(s). United States: Louisiana / New Orleans Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Low-importance). Alaska Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. QRpedia This article is linked to by one or more organisations, using QRpedia. Statistics are available. For further information, please see WikiProject QRpedia.QRpediaWikipedia:WikiProject QRpediaTemplate:WikiProject QRpediaQRpedia articles

Rick Anderson, In 1972, Two U.S Representatives Boarded a Plane and Disappeared. What Happened?, Seattle Weekly, November 3, 2015. Probably worth mining. - Jmabel | Talk 06:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is a fun read, but it uses a formula common to many conspiracy theories. First, a big wig dies "mysteriously". Second, someone claims to be responsible for the death or have knowledge of who did it. Third, an author exploits some tenuous connections between some the characters involved - most of them are usually dead - then writes a book about it. In this case, Hale Boggs and Nick Begich die in a place crash. Begich's widow then later marries Jerry Max Pasley, an ex-con who claimed to have knowledge that other unidentified or dead people were involved in bringing down the plane. Jonathan Walczak writes a book based on those claims. If we keep WP:REDFLAG in mind, I'm not sure what we would mine for use in the article. - Location (talk) 04:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I updated the information on the search and the ELT in particular. I removed the sentence that stated the accident prompted Congress to pass a law mandating ELTs, which had been here since 2005 without a citation. As my replacement text explains, the ELT law was passed by Congress before the crash. The effective date of the federal law was too far in the future for some Alaskans, so a state law with an earlier effective date, which predated the crash, was passed. I copied some of this verbatim to the Nick_Begich page. Kotaqua (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hale Boggs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20011126063946/http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/oralhistory.hom/boggsh/boggsh.asp to http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/oralhistory.hom/boggsh/boggsh.asp
• Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20011126063946/http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/oralhistory.hom/boggsh/boggsh.asp to http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/oralhistory.hom/boggsh/boggsh.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The assertion that Boggs dissented or had doubts about the Warren Commission findings has no evidence, except for an unreferenced Politico article. The assertion should be removed.Argentine84 (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]