Colonel William A. Phillips

Page contents not supported in other languages.

Untitled

Edited the following fragment:

the search for fugitive ex-Nazi Germany officials in South America to read the search for fugitive ex-Nazi officials in South America —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiker 22 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV Comment

It is well documented that Anderson engaged in libel and smear tactics (e.g. the Thomas Eagleton incident), betrayed his friends (e.g. Joseph McCarthy), and sought to undermine respect for law enforcement in the United States (e.g. J. Edgar Hoover). All of this he did because he believed he had received a call from God to engage in investigative reporting. To recite these facts is not POV, but simply objective comment about a "journalist" who engaged in despicable practices.

John Paul Parks (talk) 04:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretending that J. Edgar Hoover was a respectable law enforcement officer is an insult to law enforcement. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 15:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are also issues of his frequent violation of the privacy of his targets, bugging their offices and homes, going through their garbage, etc. This piece needs to be rewritten to include some of the problems in his record and present the perspective of who amounts to his victims. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130192940&ft=1&f=1008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.116 (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plaudit section largely irrelevant

The "Plaudit" section seems to have little to do with Anderson. He's in one sentence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.186.229 (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

a ?

smear suppression swear succession (computer generated)

Why [1] this is deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.90.197.244 (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly do you mean by "(computer generated)", or for that matter "smear suppression swear succession" or "<vot eto bot" or "Will *** full length rise exemption?"?   — Jeff G.  ツ 00:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links

I have removed the following from the external links section:

The EL section was not meant to be a compilation of obituaries. -Location (talk) 02:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference

Reference to CIA surveillance: https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol44no4/html/v44i4a07p_0020.htm - Location (talk) 21:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jack Anderson (columnist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jack Anderson (columnist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Operation Mud Hen" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Operation Mud Hen and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 6#Operation Mud Hen until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]