Colonel William A. Phillips

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Baseball: Old-time Base Ball Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Let me warn against the two "Sources" although I suspect some sloppy clerical work by a 'pedian. By reference to Retrosheet today I corrected the numbers of games scheduled for 1877 and 1889 and the maximum numbers of games played for all five NAPBBP seasons.

The 19th Century World's Championship Series' were individually scheduled and followed no set pattern.

Same as 1903 but never mind. --P64

The prose explanations at "Regular season" and its new "1871-1876" subsection are probably too long, including material that should go in the main text and, of course, in National League.

For now I can do only this "out of place" explanation. --P64 18:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is disorganized. Confusing for someone not already knowledgeable about the subject. Needs editing. joo-yoon 00:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Probably that remark means the prose article.)

The presentation of data might benefit from a wikitable ordered by years rather than by leagues. The table would use abbreviations to identify the leagues and it would include the main points but leave some details to the text. The details for 1998, for example, are too long for a cell in a table. --P64 (talk) 17:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there should be one subsection with its own table for 1871-1876 (before the leagues scheduled their members), another for 1877-1968 (when the leagues set balanced schedules), and another beginning 1961/62 covering (a) the balanced and unbalanced arrangements for scheduling 162 games, (b) the adaptations to cancellations in 1972 '81 '94 '95. Here is one suggestion for 1877-1968.

1877-1968 (balanced league schedules)

I don't know much about wiki-tables or I might do better with the column headers. Maybe the approach would be more effective with one "tall" line for all the 140-game seasons, another tall line for all the 154s. There would be multiple lines only for timespans at the left margins. Then the timespans would not be in chronological order overall. --P64 (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Best of 7 Best of 5

Don't say best 4 of 7 or best 3 of 5Duarcain (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not seem to be stable enough to stand on it's own. Maybe it should be merged into the Major League Baseball article? That's just my idea. Sjoldzic101 (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[This was inserted at the top of the page 18 hours ago, then signed by a robot. --P64 (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2011 (UTC)][reply]

I agree with assertions that this article is very hard to understand to someone who does not already understand the topic. I would suggest, (since I still don't really understand) including an example from recent years using a current MLB team. This would clarify some of the points, such as why or how the existence of divisions is played out in terms of one specific team's schedule. Otherwise, one can read the article but is still left to wonder why it seems like the Giants play Colorado every other week. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.251.211 (talk) 02:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the 20 interleague games every team now plays, we say regarding 2013 and 2014 that 16 of 20 (quote) were determined by a match of divisions, one from each league; all teams in a given division play all teams in a given division from the other league. (Each plays a three-game series against four teams from the designated division and two two-game series against the remaining team.)

The matched divisions rotate annually:

   AL East vs. NL West (2013), vs. NL Central (2014)
   AL Central vs. NL East (2013), vs. NL West (2014)
   AL West vs. NL Central (2013), vs. NL East (2014)

Each team played its four other interleague games against a designated "natural rival", with two games in each club's city.

For 2015, AL East vs NL East, Central vs Central, West vs West. Those division matches include all of the special rivalries. All 20 games will be played within those divisions in numbers 6, 4, 4, 3, 3. For example, Boston plays 6 Philadelphia, 4 Atlanta, 4 Miami, 3 New York, 3 Washington. Perhaps Toronto plays 6 Atlanta, 4 Philadelphia (because Atlanta and Philadelphia are the shared rivals of Toronto and Boston).

--P64 (talk) 01:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As an ignorant foreigner, I don't get how there can be 61 pairings within divisions, as the article claims. Five teams in each division means ten possible pairings within a division, and there are six divisions. 6 x 10 = 60, not 61. Anyone care to explain? (edit) Oh wait, that was prior to 2013, when there was one division with four teams and one with six. Now I get it.

The way the league is set up seems far too easy and straight forward. Do you think there is a way the authorities could complicate it at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.194.64 (talk) 13:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the "Time of first pitch" section is outdated: "These games are usually the only games to start before noon local time during the season." With the 11:30 AM games happening in 2022, the Nationals Independence Day and Red Sox Patriots' Day games are no longer the only regularly scheduled games to start before noon local time during the season. 74.70.68.46 (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Major League Baseball which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]