Colonel William A. Phillips

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Former good articleMartin Luther was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 18, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 31, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
May 12, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 4, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
May 24, 2011Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2012Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 25, 2004, May 25, 2005, May 25, 2006, May 25, 2007, May 25, 2008, October 31, 2008, May 25, 2009, October 31, 2009, October 31, 2010, October 31, 2011, October 31, 2012, October 31, 2014, October 31, 2018, October 31, 2019, and October 31, 2021.
Current status: Delisted good article

In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words "We are at fault in not slaying them" amounted to a sanction for murder

What a laughable comment. In Robert Michael's view? In every sane literate person's view. GMS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.17.68 (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protected Edit Request Sep. 11 2023

the beginning of the article says "despite the fact that Luther did not advocate the murdering of Jews", however, later in the article, it goes on to say "In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words 'We are at fault in not slaying them' amounted to a sanction for murder. 'God's anger with them is so intense,' Luther concluded, 'that gentle mercy will only tend to make them worse, while sharp mercy will reform them but little. Therefore, in any case, away with them!'." is this not advocating for murder in at least some sense? in any case, the addition of "did not *directly* advocate the murdering of Jews" would clear this up. Buzgie (talk) 21:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. This doesn't feel like the type of non-controversial change that should be made via an edit request without discussion first. PianoDan (talk) 18:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AGREE — Luther's words unambiguously advocated murdering Jews.
Peter Brown (talk) 21:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
AGREE
Luther unambiguously advocating the killing of Jews. This is not a matter of dispute within scholarship, and Luther's very works that are sourced within this article confirm this.
This article demonstrates with sources already that Lutheran unambiguously advocating the killing of Jews. This is not a matter of dispute within scholarship, and Luther's very works that are sourced within this article confirm this. Ysys9 (talk) 11:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is an unambiguous call for murdering Jews. It is tendentious nonsense - or illiteracy - to say otherwise. The beginning of the article is utter nonsense in disputing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.17.68 (talk) 15:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2023

this doesnt follow the guide lines so yourwe not sigm 135.135.93.91 (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Aoidh (talk) 20:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ho old was you when you died 92.30.237.252 (talk) 19:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request

Not super relevant, but, on the 4th paragraph of the 'Education' section is the following ending to the first sentence:

"(...)but none about loving God, which to Luther believed was more important."

It should be either "which to Luther was" or "which Luther believed was", or some better option. Hope you see my point and if there's time check the rest of the article for similar problems. Thank you in advance. 2001:1388:13A7:3987:6CB0:5B94:781B:F5D3 (talk) 20:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it. I think this works. Indyguy (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2024

Under section "Diet of Worms (1521)" appears the text "On 18 April 1521, Luther appeared as ordered before the Diet of Worms." The date should be changed to 17 April 1521, as noted in the linked Wikipedia page for the Diet of Worms and in the following article in the World History Encyclopedia: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1900/luthers-speech-at-the-diet-of-worms/ (the link should also be added as a reference for that line). MikeStickles (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Awhellnawr123214 (talk) 01:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]