Colonel William A. Phillips

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) place(s). Missouri Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. St. Louis Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Prior to Clay Senior, this list is duplicating the 3rd congressional district. Some of the links for the indivudual congressmen also state as representing the 3rd district and not the first. Jon 18:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accordingly, I have droped from the table everything before the Clays. Jon 18:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Missouri's 1st congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131013222920/http://2010.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ to http://2010.census.gov/2010census/popmap/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@HangingCurve: Nothing wrong this this statistic, but it's just that the phrase is unencyclopedic. Perhaps, also, you could explain the stats and make a citation? —GoldRingChip 20:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted ... toned down and added a cite to the last PVI numbers. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 20:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]