This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Split article between court system vs. the historic building
Eventually it will be worthwhile to split the article into one on the court system and one on the building. doncram 08:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is badly written, and has nonsensical and contradictory statements. It needs a major clean-up and factual corrections. For example, this is NOT a statewide court. The article seems to mix up the New York City/County court with other counties surrogate courts and says it has statewide jurisdiction in the opening paragraph. The latter seems to be nonsense. Kraxler (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it was a real mess, conflating three separate topics. The Orphans Court section, which has nothing to do with New York, has been moved to Probate court, and the Manhattan building now has its own article. Station1 (talk) 01:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]