Colonel William A. Phillips

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bush family Low‑importance Professional life of George W. Bush is within the scope of WikiProject Bush family, a project dedicated to creating and improving content related to the Bush family. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bush familyWikipedia:WikiProject Bush familyTemplate:WikiProject Bush familyBush family articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Baseball Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Texas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Just saying, this looks like a democrat wrote this. Kinda anti-Bush if you ask me. Craz Horse (talk) 19:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What the crap is this? I'm nota OF LOVE fan of Bush either, but this article seems to be pretty anti-Bush. It seems like it should be retitled "Bad things from Bush's past" or something like that. 128.12.195.100 07:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. How could half of the entry under "Texas Governorship" be about the jury summons/DUI controversy? Deleted until someone unbiased fixes it.

When George W. Bush's articles got too long, it was a wise idea to split the materials up onto new pages. However it leaves them open to vandalism on these daughter pages. Would anyone concur to agree with locking down the page with sprotect2 like it is used on the main page? ViriiK 07:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Professional life of George W. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060113161643/http://www.publicintegrity.org/docs/harken/harken_doc5.pdf to http://www.publicintegrity.org/docs/harken/harken_doc5.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629024939/http://www.publicintegrity.org/docs/harken/harken_doc7.pdf to http://www.publicintegrity.org/docs/harken/harken_doc7.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080918073117/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0721-02.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0721-02.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]