Colonel William A. Phillips

Hello, Wjw1225, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Accuver, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 07:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Accuver, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 07:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Raydann was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 07:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wjw1225! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 07:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Accuver, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 07:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak@Jimfbleak Hi Jim, I would like you to unblock my account. There are a few things that pop up me that make you block me (Recently, I created a page about Accuver company, and edited it several times.) But I believe that the contents were unbiased and objective. I only copy and pasted the source from the Press release and company website. If there are more actions that I need to take, please let me know. BR. Wjw1225 (talk) 08:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have an obvious conflict of interest and did not declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You should post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wjw1225. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wjw1225|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. You did not make such a declaration. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line, so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

• You said I only copy and pasted the source from the Press release and company website. How are these independent third-party sources?

• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

• Your company appears, from your text, to have no headquarters, employees, management structure, turnover or profits. It's hard to show notability without any facts

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• You said I believe that the contents were unbiased and objective, so let's see: a leading provider... solutions that optimize the performance... Working with all major network operators... we measure, troubleshoot and optimize... a seamless blend of user insight, design innovation, software development, cutting-edge engineering, and support services. No facts, just pure spam
• And the rest of your text is just what you sell

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

• As you said I only copy and pasted the source from the Press release and company website

You can appeal your block by completing and saving {{unblock|reason=}}. A different admi will review your request. Your reason should include the topics you wish to edit if you are unblocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Wjw1225 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for violating Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I have read and understood Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy (WP:COI) and will comply with it if unblocked. I am committed to editing Wikipedia in a constructive and collaborative manner. I will comply with the COI following below. 1. I am going to address my COI at the top of the affected talk page. 2. I am not going to directly edit or create articles that I have COI. 3. I will state facts and statistics. 4. I will post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or in my user space. 5. I will take time to get sources and policy right. 6. I will get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review my suggestions. 7. I will respect the volunteer community's time; avoid making protracted or repeated requests. Wjw1225 (talk) 12:17 am, 6 November 2023, Monday (2 months, 1 day ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

With the understanding that user will not edit directly about their company or any subject with which they have a conflict of interest. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Welcome back -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: OK to unblock?-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: as long as the COI topics are avoided, fine with me, thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Thanks for reviewing my request. Am I unbloked now? I have clicked edit source of random page. but It still shows "This account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia." Wjw1225 (talk) 04:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]