Opothleyahola

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

30 April 2024

19 April 2024

1 April 2024

16 March 2024

15 March 2024

10 March 2024

30 January 2024

8 December 2023

6 December 2023

5 December 2023

  • curprev 05:2705:27, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 156,641 bytes +39‎ My previous edits should make it clear that this article very well may need to be entirely rewritten, as almost none of it is up to Wikipedia's quality standards. I believe that this will be uncontroversial as well, as most of my large edits thus far have been deleting entire sections of complete nonsense entirely unsourced and unformatted. If any editor is weary of my criticism and changes, or addition of these tags, please review the content carefully as well as my statements on previous ed... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 05:1605:16, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 156,602 bytes +19‎ Forgot to add the date to the disputed tag. Fixed :) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 05:1505:15, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 156,583 bytes +13‎ Even after removal of the most egregious errors the article is still thoroughly littered with falsehood. I believe my placement of the disputed tag directly on the article before opening a talk page will be uncontroversial to any editor that reviews my previous edits to this article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 05:0805:08, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 156,570 bytes −538‎ Another section of absolute nonsense removed. Also lacked the basics of proper formatting. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 05:0605:06, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 157,108 bytes −2,566‎ This entire section is nothing more than a collection of unsourced fabrications. The one source cited was absolutely irrelevant, as with the last section I had to remove. The formatting, markup, grammar, and spelling were not up to the standards required to progress past elementary school. How the editor thought that this was okay to publish escapes me, but before assuming bad will or posting to a talk page, I will simply request that editors please read the basic editing guidelines provided... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 04:5904:59, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 159,674 bytes −131‎ See my last edit. Somehow the markup removed was so atrocious that it took an additional edit to remove. I do mobile edits out of convenience, but for goodness sake, if you're going to use markup at least spend an afternoon to learn it. I may sound harsh in these summaries but this is my effort to provide stern but helpful instruction to uninformed or new editors before assuming guaranteed bad will or asking for moderator intervention. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 04:5604:56, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 159,805 bytes −1,442‎ Removed a section not only devoid of truth and sources, but also devoid of any attempt at proper formatting or grammatical coherence. I believe this removal will be without any controversy, as the removed section is so full of error and bad English that it reads like a comedy sketch of why teachers won't let students cite Wikipedia. Read the rules for editing before you edit, it's really not that hard. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 04:5104:51, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 161,247 bytes −24‎ Removed the indisputably false claim that any Nicene Church body believes that purgation precedes conversion. How this was added when the excellent sources cited plainly and universally state the opposite escapes me. Please follow the editing guidelines. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 04:4504:45, 5 December 2023‎ Ysys9 talk contribs‎ 161,271 bytes −250‎ Removed astoundingly ahistorical, unsourced nonsense unlikely ever posited in print, as RCC/EO are in dispute about which council was the authentic 8th and which was a robber council. Defining the synod that deposed Photius as Ecumenical in an encyclopedia is both inappropriate and is a religious statement, rather than historical. It is also not true that mystics remained or were trichotomists nor traducians in either tradition. Information in Wikipedia must be verifiable. Follow the rules. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

2 December 2023

27 November 2023

21 November 2023

17 November 2023

2 November 2023

30 October 2023

14 October 2023

29 September 2023

9 September 2023

30 August 2023

27 August 2023

23 August 2023

31 July 2023

6 July 2023

4 July 2023

28 June 2023

24 June 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christian_mysticism&action=history