Opothleyahola


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

30 April 2024

  • curprev 18:5918:59, 30 April 2024Robinvp11 talk contribs 17,916 bytes +92 Since this is one of the parameters included in the Wikipedia template, not sure why its been removed, plus I'd like to see some evidence for the suggestion that its reflects "nationalist purposes" (French remained the language employed by European diplomats well into the 19th century) Tag: Undo
  • curprev 02:0002:00, 30 April 2024Arugami42 talk contribs 17,824 bytes −92 The language of the contract is an inconsistent and useless detail, we do not do this in other articles. I suspect nationalistic purposes behind such a minor yet broad shown detail. Tags: Reverted Visual edit

21 January 2024

8 December 2023

8 November 2023

25 October 2023

  • curprev 13:2413:24, 25 October 2023Palastwache talk contribs 17,820 bytes −76 barrier fortresses are neither mentioned by the source Onnekink nor the Dutch-French treaty; Maximilian of Bavaria, governor of the Spanish netherlands, allowed the Dutch to garrison several fortresses (not Ypres, still French) in a separate agreement according to https://www.google.de/books/edition/The_New_Cambridge_Modern_History_Volume/OOgzAAAAIAAJ?hl=de&gbpv=1&dq=Ryswick+barrier+fortresses&pg=PA381&printsec=frontcover

20 September 2023

22 August 2023

1 August 2023

29 June 2023

20 April 2023

2 April 2023

14 February 2023

17 January 2023

21 December 2022

30 November 2022

22 September 2022

20 September 2022

2 September 2022

19 August 2022

22 June 2022

22 May 2022

5 April 2022

31 March 2022

15 March 2022

7 January 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)