Opothleyahola

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bibliographies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Military history: Historiography / North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military historiography task force North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force United States: Civil War / Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

This page was linked in a discussion elsewhere, and I noticed this line at the start, "This is a selected, annotated list of the most useful titles." This probably needs rewriting, and the description needs to be clarified: who selected, annotated and decided on the contents of this page? And what is this page, is it an article about American Civil War bibliography or a new bibliography? If it is the former it needs references, it currently has one footnote. If it is a type of bibliography, then how does that accord with this document's (wikipedia) scope? Cygnis insignis (talk) 11:37, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

is it selected? yes, there are tends of thousands of possible cites, as shown by a search at amazon.com or books.google.com or a university library catalog; who selects them? at Wiki all editors pitch in, selects and annotates--subject of course to challenge from other editors. This is an article about how historians and writers have handled the Civil War. It could be structured in terms of a couple hundred footnotes, but the annotated bibliography is the usual format in most history books. (The annotations are just brief descriptions of the content -- I suppose grouping the books by topics could also be called annotation). I expanded the section on women's roles--a fast growing field. Rjensen (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split - Unit histories, battles and campaigns should be split off due to size. Thoughts???--Jax 0677 (talk) 16:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree better to split. Rjensen (talk) 19:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An impressive amount of work has gone into this article. It satisfies the notability criteria for lists, but as it stands it is original research because the works were selected mostly by two editors without any explicit selection criteria. Selection criteria are required for lists (see WP:LSC). Among the selection criteria I have seen:

1. All books on the subject (not feasible here).
2. Only those that have their own article or are demonstrably notable. There are only about 30 nonfiction books in Category:American Civil War books.
3. All of the content of a given published bibliography (would be a copyright violation).
4. Each book appears in (say) three published bibliographies. I have seen this one used successfully (I forget where), and it might be the best choice for this bibliography.

RockMagnetist (talk) 18:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged this article for lacking inclusion criteria. Also, since the members of the list are not independently notable, they should have sources demonstrating that they were taken from the published bibliographies. RockMagnetist (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my most recent revert. Somehow on first reading I didn't recognize the inclusion criteria in the changes. RockMagnetist (talk) 15:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bibliography of the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706235156/http://dig.lib.niu.edu/ISHS/ishs-2002summer/ishs-2002summer223.pdf to http://dig.lib.niu.edu/ISHS/ishs-2002summer/ishs-2002summer223.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071222114943/http://library.stmarys-ca.edu/research/history/usa/little/ to http://library.stmarys-ca.edu/research/history/usa/little/
• Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20130504053556/http://myloc.gov/Exhibitions/civilwarphotographs to http://myloc.gov/exhibitions/civilwarphotographs

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is commonly said, dispute it if you want, that John Brown did more than any other individual to bring on the Civil War. Yet he has only one book mentioned. There is a huge bibliography just on him and his raid. deisenbe (talk) 12:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Under "International Affairs," it does not appear that the first two books by Steve Sainlaude have been translated into English; rather, a Wikipedia editor may have translated their titles into English. (I just added the third book by Sainlaude, which has been translated.) I checked the Library of Congress catalog, Google Books, and amazon.com. If I am correct, then the first two titles should be changed to their original French or removed. Maurice Magnus (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]