Opothleyahola

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles United States: Massachusetts / Presidents Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts. This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents.

"With permission from the Massachusetts Historical Society"? The fact is used with permission? Loggie (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I removed this as I agree it does not belong. LarryQ (talk) 01:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the reference again, as it still makes no sense. Besides, it is not in any standard citation format. Loggie (talk) 19:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article says Charles was the son of a president, got a law degree, had a family and died of alcoholism. How is notability asserted? (Family ties don't apply,as a literal example of WP:INHERITED) Paulbrock (talk) 03:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poor Charles Adams, still a disgrace to his long-suffering father even at this late date. He doesn't even rate an entry in Wikipedia.JPSheridan (talk) 02:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously doubting that multiple independent sources do not substantially discuss him? Give me a break. Don't use the notability tag in cases where it is inconceivable that notability cannot be established. Phil Sandifer (talk) 01:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sources should be added to the article then, preferably with a better description of WHY he is notable - what did he do? I'll leave the tag off for now, but "Of course he's notable" isn't a convincing argument. Even one of the links [1] admits "I hit some books dealing with John Adams and learned more. Charles is not covered in detail in any of them..." Paulbrock (talk) 08:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck is this supposed to mean?

"He almost got kicked out, which was the first recorded case of Primal Scream."

Nogoodbooks (talk) 03:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]