Opothleyahola

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indigenous peoples of North America This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Alaska Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Languages High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MochaBear34.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 31 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jenny Lao1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Gwich’in language and Gwich'in articles use a different kind of apostrophe. If they look the same look at the URL bar of your browser, they will encoded to URL safe characters which are quite different. Should these two articles use the same apostrophe for both? Qutezuce 10:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For discussion see Talk:Gwich'in. Evertype 09:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can we take out the line about whether U+02BC is the correct encoding of the apostrophe. I think we covered in the talk that it isn’t. languagegeek (talk) 22:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does someone have a reference for the statement: "usually written with symbol U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK" ? In my experience the "usual" is to use a plain old apostrophe U+0027. Whether this is correct or not is another matter. Users of MS Word and other word processors may end up generating U+2019 via the autocorrect feature, but I still don't see evidence that this is "usual." Gholton (talk) 23:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gwich’in language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131206035354/http://www.nwtlanguagescommissioner.ca/pdf/Official_Languages_Map.pdf to http://www.nwtlanguagescommissioner.ca/pdf/Official_Languages_Map.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501154420/http://www.ynlc.ca/languages/gw/gw.html to http://www.ynlc.ca/languages/gw/gw.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]