Opothleyahola

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Poetry Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Quakers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) (assessed as Mid-importance). African diaspora This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

His hymn Dear Lord and Father of mankind is actually the last few verses of a much longer poem called The brewing of soma, the full text of which is available at [1]. It marks his observations regarding the preparation and use of the Vedic sacrificial drink in Hinduism. Whittier borrowed his copy of the Bhagavad Gita from Emerson. DFH 16:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the Wikiquote link that used to be on the page? I think it should be put back. kc12286 21:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)kc12286[reply]

"Whittier was an activist all his life, although there is no record of him ever speaking in meeting, and, unlike some others who were Orthodox, he found time to engage in politics and championed abolitionism."

First I am going to wipe this absurd implication "and, unlike some others who were Orthodox, he found time to engage in politics and championed abolitionism." I haven't the foggiest who these 'others' are, but the writer obviously thought very highly of them.

Also, the first point of the sentence (the first sentence even) needs a citation. Anyone?

MangyMaestro 05:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After taking a closer look, I decided to axe the whole thing. Knowing the second clause about never speaking in public, I don't see any justification to include the first clause unless there is evidence of his participation in active groups. In that case, it still needs a citation. The final point about his hectic life is a worthless sentence. No real information is conveyed. As a topic sentence it is fine, but it hasn't a single struts to brace it. Snicker-snack!

I don't know what to do with the Quaker beliefs section. It sticks out like a spaghetti stain on a white blouse. Chop, chop? New section?

MangyMaestro 05:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Greenleaf Whittier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051226012536/http://skyways.lib.ks.us/poetry/marais.html to http://skyways.lib.ks.us/poetry/marais.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Greenleaf Whittier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080919142059/http://www.kimopress.com/whittier.htm to http://www.kimopress.com/whittier.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article says: "As a boy, it was discovered that Whittier was color-blind when he was unable to see a difference between ripe and unripe strawberries." Is this so significant that it needs to be mentioned? Nowhere else in the article is this issue of relevance. Attic Salt (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that he was once a shoemaker is not relevant to anywhere else in the article either. It also notes that he was an editor in Pennsylvania but nowhere else in the article is this relevant. Yet, he was color-blind for his entire life and, one could argue, that's relevant to the entire article. In some instances, color-blindness is considered a disability and it's important to represent disabilities here. I'm not sure I see your point (no pun intended). --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

His younger brother Mathew Franklin Whittier was a writer, too. Stephen Sakellarios, M.S., claims in his essay The True Authorship of “The Rag-Picker; Or, Bound and Free” (Academia Letters, 2021) that he was the actual author of several works by Francis Alexander Durivage and George Pickering Burnham. Hodsha (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this information is important enough and you have a reliable third-party source, you can add it to the article in an appropriate space. Otherwise, I'm not sure why this comment was left here. Are you trying to start a debate? That's not the purpose of this page. --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]