Opothleyahola

Page contents not supported in other languages.
WikiProject iconCommonwealth
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Commonwealth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Commonwealth of Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Monarchy of Saint Kitts and Nevis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Monarchy of the United Kingdom which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monarchy of Saint Kitts and Nevis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

When did she live in Saint Kitts? Celia Homeford (talk) 10:54, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's her official residence when she's in Saint Kitts. Another example is Rideau Hall. Peter Ormond 💬 13:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt it. The source is also very bad: it's a book of humour written by an actor. The book contains 'facts' like Anne Boleyn had six fingers on eachone hand. (She didn't -- it's a story made up by Catholic propagandists.) Celia Homeford (talk) 13:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to find such a 'fact' in the book. Peter Ormond 💬 14:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see, then 'Which wife of England's Henry VIII had six fingers on one hand? This story is usually told about Anne Boleyn. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like WP:HEADLINE to me. Peter Ormond 💬 14:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you don't have a proper citation to me. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I provided the source. You seem to not like it. Peter Ormond 💬 14:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously, I don't. I've made that quite clear. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then provide a source which says otherwise. Peter Ormond 💬 14:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility for providing citations: the responsibility for providing citations does not rest with the editor challenging the content. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I already fulfilled my responsibility by providing a citation. Peter Ormond 💬 14:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A joke book by an entertainer is not an acceptable citation for the exceptional claim that the Queen has a residence on Saint Kitts. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How is it a "joke book"? Peter Ormond 💬 14:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How is it 'multiple high-quality sources' as required by the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy for exceptional claims? Celia Homeford (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh jeez. Don't bring up Rideau Hall, as I'm still peeved over its intro. Not to mention Citadelle of Quebec - Oops I mentioned it. GoodDay (talk) 16:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Title

The Governor-General has been using (see refs) a shorter form of the royal title than is standard for the Commonwealth realms. The standard form seems to have been chosen by the Queen in accordance or consistency with the Royal Titles Act 1953 (UK), no doubt in consultation with the government of each realm, and presumably established by royal proclamation—in each independent realm, otherwise by the UK. I can't find any such proclamations—especially for St K&N after independence 1983 (the title is not in the new constitution). It therefore appears that the standard form remains correct and that the G-G's form is informal. Further information would be very welcome. Errantios (talk) 00:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If all citations say one thing and no citations say the other, I am inclined to believe the citations. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]