Opothleyahola

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations: Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject International law. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article for the RMS_Lusitania refers to Cruiser Rules which, through a series of redirects, ends up at this page.

Unrestricted_submarine_warfare also refers "cruiser rules" and links to Prize Rules. Again through some redirects, it ends up at this page.

I'm still in the middle of my wikipedia rabbit hole here, but I'm immediately stumped by:

1) The fact that two separate articles link to this one referring to it as "cruiser rules" while this ones doesn't mention "cruiser rules" at all.

2) The leading paragraph of the article is just a definitions of a prize ship. Which in the context of both RMS_Lusitania and Unrestricted_submarine_warfare is really confusing.

Leaving a note here for someone with proper knowledge in this area, but I think either these redirects are setup wrong from the other pages (happy to go and fix those btw) or the introductory paragraph/header/meta tags/whatever should probably include some disambiguation about where the "cruiser rules" and "prize rules" thing comes in to play.

--Egranlund (talk) 02:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now this is about the third time I have followed that link, each time forgetting that I reached the same dead end a couple of years before. So this time I have created the article. It's not really my area of expertise but it seems that I am the best that Wikipedia has got (or at least the most willing). I believe one of the predecessor pages did once mention cruiser rules, but it didn't say anything useful and then got lost in the endless merging and renaming. SpinningSpark 23:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That was a lot of bleary eyed footnote making. *whew* But I hope this article is now a better rendering of prize law. I'll take a break for a while and come back to it after looking at a few more sources. Leave a message on this age if you have suggestions for improvements or needed expansions.FrederickFolger (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was the best response to a clarification request I have seen on wikipedia. The history of Prize law is now much clearer. Three cited paragraphs were removed; I place them here on the Talk page in case they are still useful. To the right are two images from Wikimedia Commons related to prize law.

-84user (talk) 14:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful Commons images 84user, thanks, and thanks also for the compliment. The recession has forced all the maritime museums to squeeze every last farthing out of every copyright permission for images reproduced from their collections, which is why I was leery of posting the ones I am familiar with (not knowing the copyright status). But there 's a wonderful picture of seven French corsairs attacking a prize simultaneously, which I will see if I can retrieve for free from its museum.FrederickFolger (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mariners' Museum very kindly gave me permission to reproduce the .jpg I had in mind, and sent me a clean .jpg which now ornaments the article (depending on whether I've successfully navigated the shoals of Wiki Commons copyright restrictions, that is).FrederickFolger (talk) 22:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I merged Prize rules onto this page and redirected from that page to this one. As no text survived from Prize rules (the former page was largely unsubstantiated and sadly inaccurate) there is no need of a source history link.FrederickFolger ⚓^(talk) 14:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should the rather scrappy little article Prize of war also be merged here? Davidships (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Prize (law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927034233/http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/treaties/TS1/1915/2 to http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/treaties/TS1/1915/2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927034257/http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/treaties/TS1/1915/4 to http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/treaties/TS1/1915/4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927034403/http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/treaties/TS1/1917/6 to http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/treaties/TS1/1917/6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago Spinningspark (talk · contribs) created a separate Cruiser rules article "in place of useless redirect". I propose we consider rerouting there (some of the?) following redirects:

• Prize rules
• Prize Rules
• Prize warfare (?)
• Rules of Prize Warfare
• Cruiser warfare (?)
• Prize regulations

If not for the numerosity of the redirects and unclearance of the wording of the pair marked with question signs, I would have been bold and did it myself, but believe there is a need for a discussion here. Ain92 (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the basis that cruiser rules are more about the rules of engagement and prize (law) is more about distribution of captured material, I think it is fairly clear that prize rules, Prize Rules, and prize regulations] should all redirect here. Cruiser warfare is quite ambiguous; my feeling is that it should redirect to cruiser with a disambiguating hatnote to cruiser rules. Prize warfare and Rules of Prize Warfare are less clear cut, but I think it is less confusing if anything with "prize" in the name goes to prize (law). Again, a disambiguating hatnote can be included for the last two pointing to cruiser rules. SpinningSpark 13:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]