Battle of Round Mountain

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: British / War This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the British cinema task force. This article is supported by the War films task force. Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Poland This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Some people are saying this film is in the Public domain.

Also many Puplic domain archives and moviesites offer this video as free Download.

http://www.publicdomaintorrents.com/nshowmovie.html?movieid=789

http://www.archive.org/details/Escape_From_Sobibor.avi

If this Movie is really in the Public domain we might include the Download Link to archive.org in this Article. But im not sure if this Video is really free from all copyrights, perhaps someone else knows more ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.179.8 (talk) 23:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a myth that it's public domain. As a British film, it is protected by UK copyright for 70 years after the last to die of the writer/s, director, or composer. Stanislaw Szmajzner, Georges Delerue, Reginald Rose, Jack Gold, and Thomas Blatt are all now dead (the last two only last year), but Richard Rashke is still alive, so copyright cannot expire before the end of 2086 at the earliest. Even if once deemed PD in the States on a technicality, it will have had the copyright restored under GATT. Nick Cooper (talk) 13:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlzM8736UiM

I dont understand how anyone can make a film with scenes like this. What is the smoke supposed to be? And, why is it SO wrong to defame the Jews, but it's perfectly acceptable to defame the Germans? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:4A88:6F00:7CF7:53B0:3D2B:115F (talk) 11:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You seem very confused. Is it because you are very new to the holocaust subject matter? The smoke above the gas chamber building is supposed to symbolize engine exhaust, the agent used to exterminate Jews in Sobibor (and Belzec, and Treblinka). The huge trail of smoke and fire you see later in the movie, e.g. at night symbolizes the outdoor cremation pyres in the extermination section of the camp. Who is defaming Germans? Care to cite examples of any notable figure (rather than some oddball) doing this today? Villains in this movie are the SS Totenkopfverbände, ukrainian collaborators and some Jewish capos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:502:3D80:6112:1C98:FCCD:192F (talk) 09:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't know how to make it link to this article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gertrude_Poppert

Eyant555 (talk) 01:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• RutgerHauerEscapeFromSobiborPublicDomain1.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused by the usage of the word in this sentence:

"The full 176-minute version shown in the UK[note 1] on 10 May 1987 was pre-empted by a 143-minute version shown in the United States on 12 April 1987."

Doesn't "pre-empt" mean to forestall, prevent, or interrupt and replace a scheduled broadcast programme?

"Preceded by" or "anticipated by," would be the more appropriate explanation, would it not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:2411:1C1:C400:75FE:21EB:5F48:C98A (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]