Battle of Round Mountain

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force Southeast Asia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

I'm confused by the last paragraph: is it discussing the non-Filipino prisoners-of-war (which would not be relevant, save for some officers, to The Philippine Scouts), or is it discussing POW's of all races and origins who had served the U.S. Army in the Philippines? (The previous paragraph suggests that the Filipino Scouts who had survived Camp O'Donnell had been paroled by 1943).Shakescene(talk) 06:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unless statements of collaberation by members, or whole units, of Philippine Scouts can be provided those statements will be removed.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, did the Japanese make use of Philippine Scouts who had been their POW's for occupation duty, in the way that British Indian POW's in Malaya and Burma had been recruited for Subhas Chandra Bose's Indian National Army ? Shakescene (talk) 06:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

im confused. these scouts were traitors to the Phillipines in service to both Spanish and americans? Juror1 (talk) 06:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC) No cited references have yet been provided indicating that Philippine Scout units, either in whole or in part, later served and cooperated with the Occupation of the Philippines by Japanese Forces. It is requested that if reliable sources can be found to back up these claims, that they be used when adding said content. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit, I don't have a problem with it but would quibble with the edit summary's assertion that Nisperos was "not actually an American". It seems to me that Nisperos would have been a U.S. National and a Citizen of the Philippines (or "Philippine Islands", or however that polity was properly designated at the time). See this (actually, p. 404 onwards, there). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I believe that the edit should be reverted. Filipinos during the American period, were U.S. Nationals up until 1935, as indicated by the reference in United States nationality law#Nationals who are not citizens. Furthermore there are multiple references stating that he is an Asian American. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I don't hear objections by 31 January, I will revert the edit presuming that those who voice their opinion have built a consensus on the subject. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here I've removed an unsupported assertion saying that in retaliation to the forming of a company of Macabebe Scouts under Lieutenant Matthew A. Batson, Luna's troops burned the town of Macabebe and massacred its residents. I looked for a supporting source without success. I found something vaguely close at http://philippineamericanwar.webs.com/captureofaguinaldo1901.htm. AFAIK, though, that source is WP:SELFPUB. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Philippine Scouts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130128075437/http://asianjournal.com/aj-magazine/something-filipino/17559-forgotten-soldiers-a-film-recognizing-the-bravery-and-courage-of-wwiis-philippine-scouts.html to http://www.asianjournal.com/aj-magazine/something-filipino/17559-forgotten-soldiers-a-film-recognizing-the-bravery-and-courage-of-wwiis-philippine-scouts.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.asianjournal.com/community/community-news/17827-city-of-la-recognizes-donald-plata-for-forgotten-soldiers-.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Filipinos originally received about half the pay of an American. The pay was high enough that even simple soldiers could support a family. By 1921, the salary of a simple American soldier had been increased to $21 a month. Filipinos received only $8, since in 20 years only a 40¢ increase had taken place. 1924 it came to mutiny. As a ringleader, 15 defendants were tried. As leader of the mutiny Tomas Riveral received 20 years, Gregorio Magalit ten years. He was released in 1932. Three others received 10-15 years. The Judge Advocate General in Washington considered the sentences too severe and suggested that most of them be reinstated in the scouts. The local officers refused, but the five-year prison sentence in 2½-year service was reduced in one punishment unit. (Karl Hack, Tobias Rettig (Hrsg.): Colonial Armies in Southeast Asia. Abingdon 2006, ISBN 978-0-415-33413-6, S. 193, Fn 48)--Falkmart (talk) 22:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the bases the families of the scouts lived in their own barrios. The troops were considered tidy, motivated and disciplined, but were treated with condescension. Sexually transmitted diseases and alcoholism were much rarer than among Americans, and the relationship with officers was generally good, although there was often a lack of language skills on both sides.(Karl Hack, Tobias Rettig (Hrsg.): Colonial Armies in Southeast Asia. Abingdon 2006, ISBN 978-0-415-33413-6, S. 187 and John Olsen, Frank Anders: Anytime – Anywhere: The History of the 57th Infantry (PS). 1991,)--Falkmart (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes 2404:3C00:A0AF:F2D0:748C:D0ED:EA81:FE20 (talk) 10:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]