Battle of Caving Banks

Add links

The 1926 Oklahoma gubernatorial election was held on November 2, 1926, and was a race for Governor of Oklahoma. Democrat Henry S. Johnston defeated Republican Omer K. Benedict. Also on the ballot were John Franing of the Farmer–Labor Party, E. H. H. Gates of the Socialist Party, and Independent Ed Boyle.[1]

Democratic primary

Ten candidates vied for the Democratic nomination, including former governor James B. A. Robertson and Oklahoma City Mayor O. A. Cargill. Henry S. Johnston, who had been in the Oklahoma Senate since statehood including a term as the first President pro tempore, won the primary with a plurality.

Primary Results

Democratic primary results[1]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Henry S. Johnston 87,840 36.9
Democratic W. M. Darnell 73,922 31.1
Democratic O. A. Cargill 45,993 19.3
Democratic James B. A. Robertson 13,560 5.7
Democratic William M. Franklin 4,695 1.9
Democratic Frank F. Davis 3,194 1.3
Democratic T. H. Wren 3,194 1.3
Democratic John R. Clarke 2,230 0.9
Democratic J. A. Anderson 1,721 0.7
Democratic Porter N. McCallum 1,231 0.5
Total votes 237,580 100.00

Republican primary

Eight candidates sought the Republican nomination, with Omer K. Benedict winning with less than one-third of the total vote.

Results

Republican primary results [1]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Omer K. Benedict 22,680 32.9
Republican W. J. Otjen 18,334 26.6
Republican Jim Harris 12,530 18.1
Republican James Hepburn 7,361 10.6
Republican Henry L. Cloud 3,679 5.3
Republican Edward D. Evans 1,757 2.5
Republican George Healy 1,409 2.0
Republican John G. Leiber 1,109 1.6
Total votes 68,859 100.00

Results

1926 Oklahoma gubernatorial election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Henry S. Johnston 213,167 55.0 +0.6%
Republican Omer K. Benedict 170,714 44.0 -0.7%
Farmer–Labor John Franing 1,646 0.4 New
Socialist E. H. H. Gates 1,350 0.3 -0.4%
Independent Ed Boyle 431 0.1 N/A
Democratic hold Swing +0.6%

References

  1. ^ a b c "1922-1926 results" (PDF). Oklahoma State Election Board. pp. 34, 40, 48.