Battle of Caving Banks

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Indigenous peoples of North America B‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles B This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More research needs to be conducted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phospherato (talk • contribs) 08:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how I feel about the illustrations next to "Extinguishment." I understand it relates to the topic at hand in an engaging manner, I'm just wondering if anyone finds the "-by purchase... or by conquest" captions to be a little melodramatic for an otherwise very dry legal article. I'm honestly not sure myself whether I like it or not, I'm just putting the question out there. 17:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC) The Cap'n (talk) 22:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing non-snarky to say in response to this. Savidan 22:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]