Battle of Caving Banks

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force United States: South Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Top-importance).

I changed this document to correc the statement that the S.C. Confederate Relic Room and Military Museum is a part of the State Museum. This is incorrect. The Relic Room is part of the S.C. Budget and Control Board. The State Museum is a separate state agency. It's easy to understand how this occurred as both museum are in the same building - the Columbia Mills building. The S.C. Department of Revenue is also in this building.

Thanks Michael Sponhour Director of Public Affairs S.C. Budget and Control Board —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msponhour (talk • contribs) 14:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Columbia, South Carolina in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080527005348/http://www.erostours.com/Columbia.asp to http://www.erostours.com/Columbia.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016192909/http://shermansrevenge.com/tourism.html to http://www.shermansrevenge.com/tourism.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article may primarily relate to a different subject, or place undue weight on a particular aspect rather than the subject as a whole.

I can see no basis for this claim. Could someone identify those sections of the text that are felt to be off-topic? Valetude (talk) 22:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia, South Carolina in the American Civil War → Columbia, South Carolina, in the American Civil War – Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Commas, comma should follow state. deisenbe (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• ​This is not controversial. I have added it to the technical requests list. —  AjaxSmack  19:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]