Battle of Caving Banks

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spain High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Maritime / National / European / Spanish C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force National militaries task force European military history task force Spanish military history task force Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by e.w.bullock, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 29 May 2010.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Is entirely subjective. However, by no stretch of imagination does the spanish navy rank above the PLAN or Indian Navy, whether in number of capital ships (and thereby strength), number of personnel or total tonnage. A provisional ranking would look like USN>> RuN=RN=MN(Fr) > JMSDF=IN=PLAN. GN, SpN, ROKN and MM(Italy) all come later. I'm deleting the part about rankings from the article. If someone wants to add something like that please put in some data to back it up instead of personal opinion. Madmonk11 (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The spanish navy ( Armada Espanola ) is the 6th on the world... It's difficuly to make a ranking of navies but I believe the position of the spanish Armada would be someting between 5th and 7th place

I cannot find any support for the "6th biggest navy" claim. Even lists of top 10 navies don't have Spain...sadly. AThousandYoung (talk)

What does armada mean in English? Can anyone tell me?

I believe the Armada is in 5th place but wikipedia isnt the place to debate naval power. It doesnt equal Italys navy though which is on par with France and the UK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.247.252 (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armada means "armed". The official name of the Spanish Navy is "Armada Española" for tradition, but the correct translation is "Marina española". This name (Marina Española) was used for long time before "Armada Española". In spanish, "Navy" means "marina" not armada. You can see old pictures with this name (Marina) in the aircrafts of the Spanish Navy. Actually the aircraft of the Navies of Spain, Chile, Argentina, Colombia and others americans countries used the word "Armada".

Inside of the Spanish Armada is the Spanish Marine Corps, in spanish: "Infantería de Marina" (Navy Infantry). The word "armada" is used in others names: Fuerzas Armadas Españolas (Spanish armed forces) and as adjetive: Armed Police (policia armada); Armed assault (Asalto armado) etc..

The title should be in English - Spanish navy.--Shtove 20:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did that change because other countries' navies articles do use their autochtonous names such as the Marina Militare. If I was in an error for the change, please revert it to the original name. Cheers, --Maurice27 22:28, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, it should be the English title. Maybe there's a different rule for this type of article. Ask an admin - it it's to be changed back, I think their help is needed anyway.--Shtove 14:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SP Capitan General.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Spanish Navy have a ship-naming system? I'm looking at this & makes me wonder. If anybody can say, an add there might not be a bad idea, either. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 16:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted this:

"During the Civil War, about half of the Spanish Navy had remained loyal to the Republican government and the other half joined the rebellion of Franco's Nationalists. Government forces had more destroyers (All except one, them Mussolini sold 4 old destroyers to the Nationalist), but Franco had seized both newest heavy cruisers Canarias and Baleares, armed with eight 203 mm (8 in) guns each. The two navies had skirmished throughout the war without major losses."

and this

"The Battle of the Ebro ended disastrously for the Republicans later that year."

from here, because, while interesting, I don't think it's directly relevant to the subject. Maybe of value here, tho. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 17:31 & 17:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As Spain is a kingdom, is not their naval forces also a Royal Navy like the UK?♦Drachenfyre♦·Talk 06:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spain is no longer a kingdom - like most Western countries they have some form of democracy, see this page. Also, the 'royal' in Royal Navy does not signify any particular governmental system - it is a holdover from when England had a monarchy. Andyo2000 (talk) 03:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's that nonsense? Spanish is a kingdom as much as the UK or Japan. Ever heard the term Constitutional Monarchy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.148.139.221 (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spain is no longer a kingdom? You must be joking, in fact the official name of Spain is Kingdom of Spain.--79.151.207.191 (talk) 17:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article starts out calling it the Spanish Navy but changes to Armada. If you do that, proper prose is to write Spanish Navy (Armada), but this is never done. Nitpicking, some may say but this is an encyclopediaBamler2 (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
The first para under the "Habsburg..." heading contains the sentence "Until the early 17th century, the Pacific Ocean." which seems strangely incomplete.
I wouldn't know what is missing, but perhaps somebody does?
T 88.89.5.214 (talk) 09:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caramba. It's still there. T 85.166.161.28 (talk) 13:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The missing words "was dominated by the Spanish Navy" were deleted in this edit from January 7, 2011. Having detected an emerging consensus, I shall reinstate the words. Favonian (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thx for the fix. Only 400 years, and Wikipedia gets it right :) T 85.166.161.28 (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spanish Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090824072845/http://www.buquesdeguerra.tk/ to http://www.buquesdeguerra.tk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can anyone help identify this submarine please: Image 1, Image 2, Image 3. I'm trying to find details such as the type, and what navy it belongs to. It was spotted on the Tagus River near Ponte 25 de Abril in Lisbon, Portugal on 3 April 2019. I also have a video of it, but it shows pretty much the same detail visible in the photos. Thanks in advance! Rehman 07:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Battle of Lepanto 1571.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]